Ep. 304: Dworkin v. Hart on Legal Judgment (Part Two)

1

Introduction

00:00 • 2min

2

I'm Just Legislating. The Law Stops Here

02:27 • 3min

3

Principles of Judgment in a Legal System

05:11 • 2min

4

Is Dworkin Unfairly Criticizing Hard?

07:08 • 2min

5

Is the Constitution a Rule of Recognition?

09:25 • 2min

6

Is It Really Social Relativism?

11:38 • 2min

7

Do You Think Dworkin Is a Foundationalist?

13:57 • 2min

8

Is Dworkin's Criticism of the Foundationalism of Positivism a Good One?

15:40 • 3min

9

Aren't They Still Laws?

18:22 • 2min

10

Can a Legislative System Change the Law in the Future?

20:13 • 2min

11

The Positivism Response to Dworkin's Point

22:40 • 3min

12

Do We Have a Tradition That Predates the Nazi Regime?

25:29 • 2min

13

Do We Really Have to Look Beyond Pedigree?

27:03 • 2min

14

Dworkin and Shapiro - Theoretical Disagreements in Law

28:47 • 2min

15

Does the Plain Text of the Law Control?

31:03 • 2min

16

Is the Law a Waste of Resources?

32:36 • 2min

17

What Is the Point of the Practice?

34:28 • 2min

18

The Endangered Species Act and the Dissent

36:13 • 2min

19

The Snail Daughter, a Three Inch Fish, Is Delicious

37:47 • 2min

20

Is Taunting Un-Sportsmanlike in Chess?

39:25 • 2min

21

Is Intellectual Fortitude Part of the Game?

41:26 • 2min

22

What Is the Purpose of the Law?

43:16 • 2min

23

Is There a Judgment in Blood Meridian?

45:01 • 2min