AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Inclusion is the idea that an organization should be welcoming to new populations and identities, expecting them to contribute meaningfully. However, critical inclusion takes this concept to a dangerous extreme, focusing on new identities as a way to challenge dominant norms and power dynamics. Critical inclusion pushes for the inclusion of marginalized perspectives and ideas, even if they may seem absurd or inappropriate. Disagreement is seen as exclusion, and any form of reasonable standard is seen as an imposition of power. This distorted application of inclusion leads to a dysfunctional work environment, where individuals are constantly on edge and HR becomes the center of resolving conflicts, favoring the perpetually offended or aggrieved. Inclusion is meant to create a positive environment, but critical inclusion can lead to psychological hostility and enable manipulative behavior.
The social model of disability, which shifted the responsibility for addressing disability from the individual to society, played a significant role in shaping the idea of inclusion. While the original intention was to create a more accommodating environment for individuals with disabilities, it quickly transformed into the belief that society itself was disabling them. This perspective, combined with critical theory and identity Marxism, further fueled the belief that power dynamics and exclusionary norms exist in society and need to be dismantled. However, this extreme view led to the demand for inclusion of perspectives that may be absurd or contrary to reality, such as the inclusion of feminist perspectives in glaciology or accommodating superstitions. This distorted application of inclusion not only undermines objective standards, but also empowers the perpetually offended and can create hostile working environments.
Critical inclusion, fueled by neo-Marxism and postmodernism, has created a problematic approach to inclusion. It demands the inclusion of perspectives that challenge dominant norms and power dynamics, often at the expense of reason and objectivity. Disagreement is labeled as exclusion, leading to an environment where compliance with radical perspectives becomes the norm. Critical inclusion prioritizes the perceptions of individuals who claim offense, resulting in constant conflicts, fear of speaking up, and a lack of psychological safety in the workplace. Moreover, it squanders resources, both human and organizational, and promotes a victim mentality, enabling the manipulative and fostering hostility. The distorted application of critical inclusion threatens the functional and creative aspects of a workplace, and stifles the diversity it claims to promote.
Inclusion training and the promotion of repressive tolerance are key elements in the implementation of critical theory. The goal is to address power dynamics and create a more level playing field. However, the ideology behind inclusion often leads to the empowerment of wound collectors and those who exploit the system for personal gain. The focus on historical marginalization and oppression often excludes certain perspectives while elevating activist voices. This approach not only perpetuates a divisive and double standard in society, but it also undermines the principles of fairness and individual responsibility.
Power dynamics play a central role in the concept of oppression. The idea that those in positions of power create and reinforce systems that benefit themselves is prevalent in critical theory. It leads to the belief that even well-intentioned individuals are complicit in the oppression if they benefit from the existing power structure. The emphasis on power dynamics also affects the understanding of inclusion and belonging. Those who are historically marginalized or oppressed are seen as deserving of inclusion, while others are deemed complicit in maintaining the status quo.
The implementation of critical theory and inclusion training provides opportunities for grift and corruption to thrive. The subjective nature of offense-taking allows individuals to exploit the system by feigning offense and demanding special treatment. This creates an environment where genuine conversations and critical thinking are stifled, as people fear retribution for not adhering to the prescribed ideologies. The normalization of this behavior further contributes to the rise of identity-based monsters, where emotional manipulation and tantrums become privileged forms of expression.
The podcast explores how critical diversity, equity, and inclusion perverts the true meaning and value of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Critical diversity emphasizes identity and critical consciousness, distorting the genuine value of diverse perspectives. Critical inclusion creates a psychologically hostile environment, polarizing discussions and silencing dissenting views. Critical equity focuses solely on outcome disparities, ignoring legitimate barriers to access and perpetuating a redistribution scheme. The goal of this perverted DEI approach is to establish a party apparatus through diversity recruitment and inclusion purges, ultimately driving towards a neo-communist vision of justice.
The podcast discusses how the implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives can lead to the neo-Sovietization of organizations. Within this model, diversity officers become commissars, ensuring party compliance and purging dissidents. Critical inclusion promotes censorship, pre-censorship, and positive affirmation of all contributions, creating a chilling effect on free speech. Trigger warnings, microaggressions, and community guidelines further restrict and control dialogue. The ultimate aim is to shift the Overton window, eliminate dissent, and establish a totalitarian control that mirrors neo-socialism.
DEI training is often portrayed as a tool for promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in organizations. However, this podcast episode highlights the negative consequences of such training, including the polarization of workplaces, the rise of fanatics and dissidents, and the subsequent over-polarization and fracturing of the environment. It argues that DEI training can lead to a less effective business and the promotion of individuals who prioritize ideology over the goals of the organization. The episode emphasizes the importance of removing DEI advocates from positions of power as a way to stop the colonization of workplaces by critical theories like DEI.
The podcast offers several strategies for individuals and organizations to fight back against the implementation of DEI. It encourages individuals to get informed, get organized, and take action in ways that are aligned with their personal circumstances. This can include setting fires of resistance, whistleblowing, finding alternative approaches to diversity and inclusion, lobbying state governments to create environments that resist DEI, and supporting those who are bravely resisting DEI in various ways. The episode also highlights the importance of a common humanity approach, focusing on shared values and common ground. It concludes by noting that pushing back against DEI is possible and reminds listeners that courage begets courage, encouraging individuals to take a stand and join others in the fight against DEI.
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode