Copyrighting conlangs may stifle creativity and hinder their primary purpose as systems of communication.
Separate from legal discussions, politeness, ethics, and communication with creators are crucial when using conlangs.
Conlang communities thrive through active participation, fan involvement, and open access to conlangs.
Deep dives
The importance of protecting conlangs
The LCS argues that copyright is not the right tool for protecting conlangs as it would be too broad and could stifle creativity. They believe that the language itself cannot be copyrighted, while works written in the conlang and grammar materials can be. They also discuss the potential implications if conlangs were copyrightable, such as the need for permission to use the language and the fear of being sued. The LCS aims to set a precedent that conlangs cannot be copyrighted, protecting both creators and users of conlangs.
The social aspect of conlangs
The podcast episode emphasizes that the legal discussion about copyright is separate from the social aspect of conlangs. They highlight the importance of politeness, ethics, and communication with creators when featuring or using a conlang. While legal actions are relatively rare, the social consequences and discussions around conlangs play a significant role in how they are shared and used.
The limitations of copyright in conlangs
The podcast delves into the limitations of copyright in relation to conlangs. They argue that conlangs, as systems of communication, shouldn't be subject to copyright restrictions because it hinders their primary purpose. They emphasize the distinction between protecting a conlang's grammar and dictionary, which can be copyrighted, and attempting to control the language itself, which they believe should not be copyrightable. They discuss the potential harm of stifling creativity and the negative impact on the conlanging community.
The value of conlang use and interaction
The podcast highlights the value of conlang use and interaction within the community. They cite examples of conlangs flourishing due to active participation and engagement, such as the Navi and Dothraki languages. They argue against restricting the usage of conlangs and emphasize that fans' involvement and the ability to communicate in these languages contributes to the success and growth of conlang communities.
The importance of the amicus brief
The podcast recognizes the significance of the amicus brief filed by Mark Randazzo on behalf of the LCS. They encourage listeners to read it, praising its humor and insightful arguments. The brief addresses copyright law, the distinction between conlangs and natural languages, and the creative use of conlangs. While the podcast acknowledges some confusion and misconceptions in the press coverage, overall, they find that the core arguments against copyrighting conlangs have been well understood.
George brings on Sai, Christophe, and attorney Mark Randazza to talk about the LCS’s decision to file an amicus brief in Paramount v Axanar. Links and Resources: LCS press release (with links to press articles) Amicus brief (and exhibits) The Dentons legal memo The Visual Artists Rights Act (- Wiki — closest thing the US... Read more »
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode