New Books in the History of Science

Retraction Watch: A Discussion with Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky

Feb 11, 2022
Ask episode
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1
Introduction
00:00 • 5min
2
What Are the Most Common Reasons for Retractions?
05:06 • 2min
3
Retraction Notices Are Due to Honest Error
07:17 • 3min
4
How Do You Deal With Editors?
10:21 • 3min
5
Is There a Quality Control Mechanism in Scientific Publishing?
13:45 • 3min
6
The Quality of the Referee at a Socker Game
17:02 • 2min
7
Peer Reviewing Cove 19 Experts
18:41 • 3min
8
Ivan Er, I Think It's a Point of Knowledge
21:16 • 3min
9
Is Retraction the Biggest Problem Facing Science?
24:09 • 3min
10
Is Open Access a Panacea?
26:59 • 5min
11
The Uncertainty of Science
32:02 • 4min
12
Is the Trust in Science in the United States Increasing During the Pandemic?
36:00 • 6min
13
Public Mistrust and Science and So On
41:38 • 6min
14
Songs That Shake the Planet by Chucktee
47:33 • 3min
15
I Think the Basic Building Blocks of a Scientific Education Are Woefully Inadequate
50:48 • 3min
16
The Number of Retractions Continues to Increase
54:02 • 5min
17
What Is the Investigation Process Like in Retraction Watches?
59:26 • 6min
18
What It Means for Scientists
01:05:18 • 2min
19
The Office of Research Integrity Doesn't Ban You From Receiving a Search Funds Permanently
01:07:30 • 4min
20
How Do You See the Best Communication of a Retraction?
01:11:52 • 4min
21
Adding Value to the Data Base
01:15:59 • 3min
22
Is There a Standard for Retraction Notices?
01:18:35 • 6min