Improve your decision-making, frameworks for learning, backcasting, and more | Annie Duke (#60 rebroadcast)
Sep 2, 2024
auto_awesome
Annie Duke, a former World Series of Poker champion and author, shares her expertise on decision-making. She discusses how poker serves as a model for navigating uncertainty and incomplete information. Annie emphasizes the importance of broadening our decision-making perspectives beyond negative outcomes, which fosters risk aversion. She introduces backcasting as a strategy to visualize future goals and reverse-engineer actions. The conversation also covers the comparison of decision-making in poker versus chess, offering insights into probabilistic thinking and learning frameworks.
Annie Duke illustrates how poker serves as a practical model for decision-making, emphasizing the interplay of luck and skill.
The discussion highlights the limitations of focusing on negative outcomes, fostering a culture of risk aversion stifling innovation and progress.
Duke introduces the importance of conducting premortems to assess potential risks before they materialize, enhancing strategic decision-making.
Backcasting is presented as a useful planning tool, encouraging individuals to work backward from their goals to identify necessary actions.
The podcast stresses the significance of a thoughtful decision matrix for evaluating choices, urging deeper analysis beyond simple win or loss outcomes.
Fostering an open discussion environment within teams enhances collective learning and innovative thinking, ultimately leading to better decision-making.
Deep dives
Translating Longevity Science
The podcast focuses on making the science of longevity accessible to everyone. The host emphasizes the commitment to providing quality content in health and wellness without relying on paid advertisements. Membership is highlighted as a key funding source, offering exclusive content and benefits to enhance knowledge in the field. The goal is to ensure members receive significant value exceeding their subscription cost.
Exploring Decision Making Through Poker
The conversation delves deeply into decision making using poker as a model system. The host believes poker exemplifies decision-making in real life, particularly in situations marked by incomplete information. They cover concepts such as 'backcasting' and the importance of conducting premortems rather than just post-mortems to evaluate decisions. Evaluating post-decision outcomes also involves a decision matrix to critically assess the decision-making process and its outcomes.
The Importance of Context in Decision Making
Contrasting poker with chess, the host explains that poker better simulates real-life decision making due to its inherent uncertainty and incomplete information. In chess, every player has complete knowledge, making outcomes more deterministic. The discussion highlights how decisions in life, much like in medicine, are often made with partial information, requiring thoughtful consideration of possible outcomes. This complexity encourages honing skills rather than solely relying on perfect information for decision making.
Navigating Luck and Skill
The podcast emphasizes understanding the significant roles that luck and skill play in decisions. The host discusses how people often misattribute outcomes—whether successes or failures—to their skills or luck without fully analyzing the decision-making process. This analysis can lead to misconceptions, particularly when wins are celebrated as skillful and losses seen as mere bad luck. The conversation encourages examining both wins and losses comprehensively to improve future decisions.
The Danger of Resulting
Resulting is a key concept discussed, where individuals judge the quality of a decision solely based on its outcome. For example, decision-makers might believe they made the right call if they won and the wrong one if they lost, overlooking the quality of the decision itself. This simplification can lead to misguided beliefs regarding their capabilities, particularly in uncertain situations such as poker. The podcast suggests that a deeper evaluation of decisions—beyond merely whether the result was favorable—is critical for accurate self-assessment.
The Role of Premortems
The importance of conducting premortems is emphasized as a means of examining potential risks before outcomes are known. This method involves considering what could go wrong to identify weaknesses in assumptions or plans. Such foresight can lead to better preparedness for unforeseen circumstances, allowing decision-makers to adapt their strategies accordingly. By proactively addressing potential failures, they may enhance their chance of success while mitigating the impact of negative outcomes.
Feedback Loops and Self-Deception
Attention is drawn to the differing natures of feedback in various industries, specifically those where outcomes are immediate versus those with longer time horizons. In quicker contexts like poker, mistakes are evident, paving the way for immediate learning and adaptation. However, in industries with a longer feedback cycle, self-deception may run rampant, causing individuals to ignore poor decisions due to misattributed success. The discussion urges the need for ongoing self-reflection and learning, particularly in less immediate contexts.
Backcasting for Future Outcomes
Backcasting is introduced as a valuable tool for planning future outcomes by starting with the end goal and working backward to identify necessary steps. This contrasts with forecasting, where one primarily focuses on what actions to take to reach a goal. Backcasting encourages awareness of potential roadblocks and how luck could influence those outcomes. The process sharpens decision-making skills by ensuring that both opportunity and risk are considered in planning.
Overcoming Analysis Paralysis
The podcast addresses the common issue of analysis paralysis, where individuals become overwhelmed by the complexity of decision-making processes. By clarifying their goals and applying the frameworks discussed, individuals can make faster, more confident decisions without getting bogged down by uncertainty. The conversation emphasizes that understanding probability and risk can actually facilitate quicker decision-making. A structured approach allows quicker assessments and actions, particularly in competitive environments.
Learning from Wins and Losses
The value of examining outcomes—both positive and negative—is underscored as essential for continuous improvement. When individuals achieve success, they should analyze what strategies or decisions contributed positively to cultivate those winning conditions in the future. Conversely, reflecting on losses allows for identifying missteps and areas for growth. The focus should not only be on the outcomes themselves but also on understanding the underlying decision-making processes.
Creating a Culture of Open Decision Making
Finally, fostering an environment that encourages open discussion of decisions—regardless of outcomes—is vital for growth and learning. The podcast emphasizes the role of leadership in promoting a culture where all team members feel safe to explore ideas and learn from mistakes. By creating a space where individuals can share insights without fear of judgment, organizations can cultivate more innovative thinking. This approach ultimately leads to optimal decision-making within teams and organizations.
In this episode, former World Series of Poker champion and author Annie Duke explains how poker is a pertinent model system for decision-making in the real world, a system which blends imperfect information with some unknown percentage of both luck and skill. Annie breaks down the decision-making matrix, revealing how we often focus too narrowly on just one of the four quadrants, missing out on valuable learning opportunities in the remaining 75% of situations. She delves into how our tendency to evaluate only negative outcomes leads to a culture of risk aversion. This mindset, she argues, stifles the kind of bold decision-making necessary for progress and innovation across various fields, from poker and sports to business and medicine. Annie also introduces a robust framework for learning and the levels of thought required to excel in any domain. Finally, she discusses a strategy called “backcasting”, a concept that resonated deeply with Peter in terms of how he thinks about extending healthspan.
We discuss:
Annie’s background, favorite sports teams, and Peter’s affinity for Bill Belichick [1:30];
Chess vs. poker: Which is a better metaphor for decision-making in life (and medicine)? [6:45];
Thinking probabilistically: Why we aren’t wired that way, and how you can improve it for better decision-making [12:30];
Variable reinforcement: The psychological draw of poker that keeps people playing [19:15];
The role of luck and skill in poker (and other sports), and the difference between looking at the short run vs. long run [32:15];
A brief explanation of Texas hold ‘em [41:00];
The added complexity of reading the behavior of others players in poker [47:30];
Why Annie likes to “quit fast,” and why poker is still popular despite the power of loss aversion [52:45];
Limit vs. no-limit poker, and how the game has changed with growing popularity [55:15];
The advent of analytics to poker, and why Annie would get crushed against today’s professionals [1:04:45];
The decision matrix, and the “resulting” heuristic: The simplifier we use to judge the quality of decisions —The Pete Carroll Superbowl play call example [1:10:30];
The personal and societal consequences of avoiding bad outcomes [1:21:45];
Poker as a model system for life [1:31:30];
How many leaders are making (and encouraging) status-quo decisions, and how Bill Belichick’s decision-making changed after winning two Super Bowls [1:35:15];
What did we learn about decision-making from the Y2K nothingburger? And how about the D-Day invasion? [1:39:30];
The first step to becoming a good decision maker [1:43:00];
The difference between elite poker players and the ones who make much slower progress [1:49:45];
Framework for learning a skill, the four levels of thought, and why we hate digging into our victories to see what happened [1:52:15];
The capacity for self-deception, and when it is MOST important to apply four-level thinking [2:00:30];
Soft landings: The challenge of high-level thinking where there is subtle feedback and wider skill gaps [2:11:00];
The benefits of “backcasting” (and doing pre-mortems) [2:13:30];
Parting advice from Annie for those feeling overwhelmed (and two book recommendations) [2:21:30]; and
