Unfair laws / Why judges should be originalists (William Baude)

1

Introduction

00:00 • 3min

2

Is Qualified Immunity Really a Thing?

03:13 • 2min

3

Is Qualified Immunity a Good Idea?

04:55 • 2min

4

Are the Defenders of Qualified Immunity Really Wrong?

06:41 • 2min

5

Can I Use Qualified Immunity?

08:30 • 2min

6

Is There a Qualified Immunity Solution?

10:13 • 3min

7

The Courts Have a Common Law Power Soso

13:01 • 4min

8

Is Civil Asset Forfeiture a Thing Ort?

16:43 • 2min

9

You Don't Have a Right to a Jury

18:57 • 2min

10

How Does Precedent Work?

21:08 • 2min

11

I'm a Gun Owner, Not a Drug Dealer

22:45 • 2min

12

What Is Originalism?

24:21 • 2min

13

What Is the Biggest Alternative to Originalism?

26:12 • 2min

14

Are the Living Constitutionalist Judges Uncharitable?

28:29 • 2min

15

The Role of Policy Making in the Court of Appeals

30:27 • 3min

16

Is There a Difference Between Originalism and the Alternatives?

33:22 • 2min

17

Living Constitutionalism

35:17 • 2min

18

What Is Our Law?

37:06 • 2min

19

Is This What a Judge Is Said to Do?

39:14 • 2min

20

Is the Originalist Interpretation How Things Are Done?

41:00 • 2min

21

The Revolution Can Happen Through Slow Creep

42:56 • 2min

22

The Principles of Justification Are More Important Than the Principles of Originalism

44:28 • 3min

23

Is It Possible to Be 100% Objective?

47:13 • 2min

24

Originalists Are Political Conservatives, Right?

49:05 • 2min

25

The Relationship Between Conservatives and Originalists in the Supreme Court

51:00 • 2min

26

Is It Better to Be Bias Than to Be Unbiased?

52:53 • 2min

27

Is It Better to Be Explanatory About Bias?

54:45 • 3min

28

Is It a Good Idea to Teach Argumentative Hygiene?

57:37 • 3min

29

The Doctrine of Qualified Immunity

01:00:48 • 2min