Is the Originalist Interpretation How Things Are Done?

Originalists are either elating the descriptive and the normative, or just talking about the normaniv ora both. I think the most important evidence is what do people do when the sort of different sources of law r argument come into conflict? So you can find lots of sort of canonical cases where the court will say things like, well, this is what the text and th original understanding require. M and i think tat that kind of evidence is some ofth some of the most powerful. Is there anything else you want to mention? Ah, right. You mentioned lake looking at how past justices have justified their decisions if they've used originalist reasoning or not. O and is it