AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
This narrative review explores various aspects of resistance training technique for optimizing hypertrophy. It emphasizes that repetition tempo should range from about 2 to 8 seconds, with eccentric control but no need for extremely slow eccentrics. The review suggests that utilizing a range of motion that emphasizes long muscle lengths is generally effective for muscle hypertrophy, but there is no clear evidence on the superiority of one exercise variation over another. Additionally, the review points out that there is limited research on the effects of strict versus non-strict technique on hypertrophy. Overall, the review provides recommendations for technique optimization, but also recognizes the need for more research in this area.
While there is a large amount of content on exercise technique optimization, it is important to acknowledge the limited evidence supporting many claims. Some educators and influencers may present technique adjustments as scientifically informed, but the actual direct literature on this topic is limited. It is essential to be critical of claims that lack empirical validation and to prioritize fundamental principles of exercise technique, such as emphasizing long muscle lengths and controlling repetition duration within a reasonable range. While slight adjustments in technique can be explored, they may not have a substantial impact on hypertrophy outcomes, especially if a well-rounded training program is already in place.
Research exploring the effects of repetition tempo on hypertrophy suggests that specific fixed durations for the eccentric or concentric phase do not significantly enhance muscle growth. Slower eccentrics have often been emphasized, but recent evidence suggests that the duration of the entire repetition between 2 to 8 seconds, with eccentric control, can be effective for hypertrophy. The idea that extremely slow eccentrics are essential appears to be unfounded. While repetition tempo can be nuanced, it should generally fall within a reasonable range, with an emphasis on controlled tempo rather than excessively slow speed.
It is important to distinguish between evidence-based technique recommendations and claims made without substantial empirical validation. Many claims regarding exercise technique are not supported by direct research on hypertrophy outcomes. While there may be biomechanical reasoning behind some technique adjustments, the direct evidence for their impact on muscle growth may be lacking. It is crucial to critically evaluate claims about technique optimization and prioritize fundamental principles supported by current evidence.
The difference between maintenance volume and minimum effective dose for hypertrophy is that maintenance volume refers to the amount of training volume needed to maintain muscle mass, while minimum effective dose refers to the minimum amount of training volume needed to see meaningful hypertrophy gains. Maintenance volume for hypertrophy can be as low as one to three sets per muscle group per week, while minimum effective dose typically falls in the range of three to six sets per muscle group per week for more reliable gains.
Understanding the concept of minimum effective dose for hypertrophy is important for individuals with time constraints, lack of motivation, or other life priorities. It reassures them that they can still make meaningful strength and muscle gains even with limited training. The concept is also valuable for long-term progress, as it emphasizes the importance of consistency and adherence to training. Additionally, for non-lifters or individuals new to resistance training, knowing that even a minimal amount of work can lead to positive results can be encouraging in adopting a regular strength training routine.
The minimum effective dose for hypertrophy may not significantly change over a training career. Studies have shown that even untrained individuals can benefit from one to three sets per muscle group per week, and the range of three to six sets per muscle group per week is often effective for most individuals. While the actual volume needed to see gains may differ based on individual factors, it is unlikely that as training status increases, the minimum effective dose significantly increases. However, there may come a point in an advanced lifter's career where even higher volumes are required to continue making meaningful strength gains.
The difference between maintenance volume and minimum effective dose for hypertrophy is that maintenance volume refers to the amount of training volume needed to maintain muscle mass, while minimum effective dose refers to the minimum amount of training volume needed to see meaningful hypertrophy gains. Maintenance volume for hypertrophy can be as low as one to three sets per muscle group per week, while minimum effective dose typically falls in the range of three to six sets per muscle group per week for more reliable gains.
The podcast episode discusses the concept of minimum effective dose (MED) and maintenance volume in resistance training. The host emphasizes that MED is often much lower than what is commonly believed to be necessary for progress. They mention a study from 2011 where participants were able to maintain and even make gains when their volume was reduced to one-third or one-ninth of their original volume. The host also mentions that the idea of maintenance volume being higher than MED is not supported by evidence. They conclude that as long as intensity of effort is maintained and overall volume is not drastically reduced, it is difficult to lose muscle mass during training.
In this part of the podcast, the host addresses the question of whether frequency or volume matters more when working with minimal effective dose. They explain that based on their own studies, frequency doesn't seem to play a significant role in progress, as participants were able to make great gains in deadlifts, even with once-a-week training. They also mention that real-world coaching experience suggests that deadlifts are often trained less frequently than squats, which is why they replicated this in their studies. They conclude that as long as quality volume is achieved and it feels manageable, it doesn't matter whether the workload is spread throughout the week or concentrated in one larger session. They also touch on how individual goals may impact volume and frequency considerations.
The podcast addresses the question of how to manipulate volume over time to maximize progress. The host highlights that the idea of only increasing volume when progress stalls is not supported by evidence and may be based on assumptions of volume tolerance. They mention that volume tolerance is not a fixed variable and cutting back on volume does not necessarily lead to performance regression. Instead, the host suggests starting slightly higher than the minimum effective dose for competitive lifters and adjusting as necessary, while also considering other variables like intensity, frequency, and proximity to failure. For non-competitive lifters, they recommend starting with a moderate volume and gradually increasing if performance and recovery allow. The host emphasis that individual response and goals should guide volume manipulation.
Towards the end of the podcast, the hosts discuss the limitations of conceptual models and the importance of considering data in the field of resistance training. They highlight that the relationship between volume and hypertrophy is not a strict inverted U shape and that the data supports higher volumes for muscle growth. They also discuss the limitations of volume tolerance as a concept and caution against being overly conservative with volume adjustments. The hosts suggest that the relationship between volume, progress, and fatigue is complex and context-dependent, and that performance and recovery indicators should guide volume manipulation.
The podcast concludes with the hosts expressing their appreciation for the listeners and inviting them to reach out with any questions or inquiries. The host provides contact information through YouTube, Instagram, and a website where free minimum effective dose templates are available.
In this episode, Greg is joined by Dr. Patroklos Androulakis-Korakakis (Dr. Pak) to discuss his research on minimum effective dose training, and his recent narrative review on optimizing exercise technique for muscle growth. While this episode does dig into the research, the lads tried to keep a clear focus on actionable takeaways to help you improve your training results.
TIME STAMPS
Intro and Plugs (00:00:00)
Dr. Pak Intro, Bio and Projects (00:15:49)
Dr. Pak's Paper: Optimizing Resistance Training Technique to Maximize Muscle Hypertrophy (00:34:14)
Technique: Tempo/Eccentric and Concentric Movement (00:59:14)
Minimum Effective Dose - Overview (01:16:14)
Dr. Pak's PhD Research - Implications for MED (01:24:51)
Why Should We Care about MED? (01:41:18)
How Does MED Change Over Time? (01:52:01)
Q&A (01:59:53)
Social Media Q&A (02:13:22)
Outro (02:30:47)
Follow Pak:
MORE FROM THE SBS TEAM
RECOMMENDED PRODUCTS
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode