AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Kant, a prominent Enlightenment thinker, emphasized the importance of reason over emotions or faith. He proposed the idea that distinguishing right from wrong should be based on rationality and universal laws. Kant's concept of the categorical imperative, where doing the right thing is akin to a universal law, has had a lasting impact on moral philosophy.
Kant's background and education in a pietist school shaped his early views, leading to a rebellion against strict religious doctrines. His exposure to evangelicalism influenced his personal outlook, although it did not align entirely with his philosophical ideas. Kant's upbringing reflected a blend of traditional religious values and a growing emphasis on individual morality.
Kant's role as a moral philosopher centered on ethics, distinguishing between right and wrong actions guided by reason. His emphasis on the importance of a 'good will' and human moral responsibilities laid a foundation for modern human rights concepts. Kant's categorical imperative underscored the significance of treating humanity as an end in itself, influencing the development of human rights principles.
Kant's groundbreaking work, the 'Critique of Pure Reason,' delved into epistemological questions about knowledge and the limits of human understanding. By challenging traditional proofs of God's existence and asserting the inherent limitations of human freedom, Kant laid the groundwork for practical philosophy. His incorporation of reason into ethical decision-making, culminating in the autonomy formulation of the categorical imperative, reshaped ethical thought.
Kant's advocacy for individual autonomy and moral responsibility in decision-making transcended his time, influencing diverse philosophical movements. His vision of creating a moral community based on rational dialogue and adherence to ethical principles inspired subsequent generations of thinkers. Kant's enduring legacy lies in his promotion of reason, autonomy, and a culture of moral accountability.
Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss how, in the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) sought to define the difference between right and wrong by applying reason, looking at the intention behind actions rather than at consequences. He was inspired to find moral laws by natural philosophers such as Newton and Leibniz, who had used reason rather than emotion to analyse the world around them and had identified laws of nature. Kant argued that when someone was doing the right thing, that person was doing what was the universal law for everyone, a formulation that has been influential on moral philosophy ever since and is known as the Categorical Imperative. Arguably even more influential was one of his reformulations, echoed in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in which he asserted that humanity has a value of an entirely different kind from that placed on commodities. Kant argued that simply existing as a human being was valuable in itself, so that every human owed moral responsibilities to other humans and was owed responsibilities in turn.
With
Alison Hills Professor of Philosophy at St John's College, Oxford
David Oderberg Professor of Philosophy at the University of Reading
and
John Callanan Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at King's College, London
Producer: Simon Tillotson.
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode