

#76 (Bonus) - Is P(doom) meaningful? Debating epistemology (w/ Liron Shapira)
Nov 8, 2024
Liron Shapira, host of Doom Debates and an expert in AI risks, welcomes Vaden Masrani and Ben Chugg for a vibrant discussion on epistemology. They dive into the contrasting views of Popperian and Bayesian reasoning while exploring the existential threats posed by AI. The trio debates whether it's reasonable to quantify beliefs and the challenges of predicting catastrophic events. Additionally, they touch on the complexities of prediction markets and the philosophical implications of Bayesianism in understanding human cognition and decision-making.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Intro
00:00 • 5min
Exploring P(Doom): The Limits of Probability
04:59 • 9min
The Central Role of Epistemology in Human Understanding
13:42 • 4min
Epistemological Duel: Popper vs. Bayesian
17:45 • 13min
Engineering Satellites: Theories and Probabilities
31:07 • 12min
Explaining Explanations: Computation, Proofs, and Hypotheses
43:22 • 11min
Bayesian Reasoning and Human Cognition
54:20 • 18min
Exploring Solominov Induction and Bayesian Philosophy
01:12:32 • 4min
Exploring Popperian Epistemology
01:16:12 • 21min
The Debate of Epistemological Theories
01:37:30 • 20min
Exploring Expected Value and Prediction Markets
01:57:15 • 22min
Exploring Futarchy and Prediction Markets
02:19:23 • 19min
Exploring the Divergence of Popperianism and Bayesianism in Forecasting
02:38:49 • 2min
The Limitations of Probability in Prediction
02:41:12 • 4min
Exploring Bayesianism and Popperianism: Calibration in Epistemology
02:44:55 • 6min