Snipd home pageGet the app
public
Cato Podcast chevron_right

A Case for Limiting the Time and Term of Supreme Court Justices

Nov 8, 2022
36:05
forum Ask episode
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
1
Introduction
00:00 • 4min
chevron_right
2
The Supreme Court Justices' Lifetime Duty Roster
03:32 • 2min
chevron_right
3
Supreme Court Justices in Active Service
05:48 • 4min
chevron_right
4
The Crown Podcast
09:49 • 2min
chevron_right
5
Three Reasons Why We Have Too Young and Too Old Today
11:39 • 4min
chevron_right
6
The US Supreme Court Model of Active Service for Life
15:42 • 2min
chevron_right
7
The Eighteen Year Plan Eliminates the Reality of Political Resignations
17:38 • 3min
chevron_right
8
Is It Constitutional?
21:07 • 2min
chevron_right
9
The Court's Power to Say What the Law Is
22:56 • 2min
chevron_right
10
Constitutional Reforms - What You Can't Do by a Statute
25:09 • 3min
chevron_right
11
Constitutional Principles - The 18 Year Time Limit
28:08 • 3min
chevron_right
12
Circuit Writing and the Supreme Court of the United States
31:00 • 3min
chevron_right
13
The 18-Year Reform Proposal Is a Good Idea
33:45 • 2min
chevron_right
What's the case for limiting the time or term of Supreme Court justices? Akhil Reed Amar of Yale Law School made his case at the Cato Institute's Constitution Day festivities in September.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

HomeTop podcastsPopular guestsTop books