7. Good vs. Bad Friction in Higher Education: A Conversation with Robert Sutton
Jan 20, 2025
auto_awesome
Robert Sutton, an organizational psychologist and Stanford professor, dives into his book, The Friction Project, discussing the difference between good and bad friction in organizations. He shares how leaders can enhance productivity by recognizing and addressing unnecessary friction points in higher education. Sutton emphasizes the importance of collaboration and simplifies bureaucratic processes to foster creativity. He advocates for thoughtful decision-making and shares actionable strategies for academic leaders to create a supportive and efficient environment.
Good friction fosters innovation and thoughtful decision-making, while bad friction results in unnecessary bureaucratic complexity that hinders productivity.
Effective leadership is essential in identifying and addressing friction points, prioritizing simplification to cultivate collaboration and enhance academic efficiency.
Deep dives
The Importance of Identifying Friction
Friction within academic institutions can significantly hinder productivity and innovation. Examples from successful organizations illustrate how excessive bureaucracy, such as lengthy administrative processes and overwhelming communication, can create barriers for faculty and staff. A notable case involves an email sent to Stanford faculty that included unnecessary complexity, which could have been communicated more succinctly. Leaders in academia must actively seek to identify and reduce such friction to foster a more efficient and collaborative environment.
Different Types of Friction: Good vs. Bad
Understanding the distinction between good and bad friction is essential for effective leadership in academic settings. Bad friction often manifests as unnecessary delays or overly complex procedures, while good friction serves important purposes, such as maintaining standards or fostering thoughtful decision-making. The hiring process at Google exemplifies this contrast, where a tradition of excessive interviews created bottlenecks. By introducing rules to streamline hiring, organizations can reduce bad friction while recognizing that some level of intentional friction is necessary for effective functioning.
Leadership's Role in Managing Friction
Effective leadership plays a crucial role in managing friction by creating a culture that emphasizes simplification and support. An outstanding example from Stanford highlights how a department chair evaluates staff based on their ability to simplify processes and support students. This practice empowers employees and fosters an environment where burdens are alleviated and collaboration is prioritized. Leaders should also engage actively with staff to identify friction points, encouraging a problem-solving approach rather than allowing blame to circulate among departments.
Creating a Culture for Innovation and Adaptability
Managing friction effectively can cultivate a culture that promotes innovation and adaptability within academic institutions. Excessive administrative burdens can stifle creativity and research efforts, while reducing these inefficiencies can free up time for faculty and staff to innovate. For instance, initiatives that aim to simplify processes and remove unnecessary tasks not only enhance efficiency but also provide more breathing room for creative endeavors. Consequently, prioritizing a friction management strategy supports a healthier work environment conducive to academic growth and transformation.
In this conversation with EdUp Provost host Dr. Gregor Thuswaldner, Dr. Bob Sutton discusses his latest book, The Friction Project, co-authored with Huggy Rao. The book explores the concept of friction in organizations and how leaders can differentiate between good and bad friction. Sutton shares insights from his experiences at Stanford University and emphasizes the importance of leadership in reducing unnecessary friction in the higher education context to enhance productivity. He provides practical strategies for academic leaders to identify and address friction points within their institutions, advocating for a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches to create a more efficient and supportive environment for faculty and students. Sutton discusses the complexities and challenges of administrative processes in higher education. He emphasizes the importance of collaboration, user-centered design, and the need to simplify bureaucratic structures. The discussion also highlights the concept of 'good friction' in fostering creativity and innovation, as well as the necessity of slowing down to make thoughtful decisions. The conversation concludes with a recommendation for academic leaders to embrace actionable strategies for improvement.
Takeaways
• Good friction can lead to better outcomes, while bad friction hinders productivity.
• Leadership plays a crucial role in identifying and addressing friction points.
• Sutton highlights the need for academic leaders to simplify processes.
• Practical strategies include evaluating staff on their ability to ease burdens.
• The subtraction game can help identify unnecessary processes.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode