That Triathlon Show cover image

That Triathlon Show

High intensity, running power, suffering capacity, bias in training prescription (Q&A) | EP#447

Oct 22, 2024
Tobias Haumann, a scientific triathlon coach with expertise in endurance sports, joins the discussion. He dives into the concept of 'round number bias' in training prescriptions, pointing out its drawbacks. The duo explores the cost-benefit aspect of high-intensity intervals, discussing their value in training. They delve into the importance of suffering capacity during races and evaluate the reliability of running power metrics and devices, highlighting the need for individualized approaches to training for optimal performance.
01:11:03

Episode guests

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • Training plans often simplify session durations and intensities using round numbers, aiding clarity but potentially introducing biases in training prescription.
  • Incorporating various anaerobic training methods is essential for developing raw speed and muscular coordination tailored to different race demands.

Deep dives

Round Numbers in Training Plans

Training plans often utilize round numbers for session durations, rest intervals, and tapering periods to simplify the process for athletes. While this may lead to discussions about potential biases toward simplification, using whole numbers helps maintain clarity and ease of use during training. For instance, swim training typically employs increments that align with whole seconds, making it more accessible for athletes to manage their times effectively. Ultimately, the focus should remain on total workload and the quality of the session rather than getting caught up in the precision of individual intervals.

Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts

Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
App store bannerPlay store banner