Eric Barends

Eric Barends, Managing Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Management, and Denise Rousseau, H J Heinz University Professor at Carnegie Mellon University, dive into the importance of systematic searches in academic literature. They discuss translating managerial terms into academic constructs, the role of peer review in ensuring study quality, and how AI tools like ChatGPT can enhance search effectiveness. The duo also contrasts quick AI searches with rigorous methods necessary for high-stakes decisions, providing listeners with practical tips for navigating academic databases.

Denise Rousseau is an expert in organizational research at Carnegie Mellon University, while Rob Briner teaches Organizational Psychology at Queen Mary University, and Eric Barends leads the Center for Evidence-Based Management. They explore how academics choose research topics based on interest and practicality. The guests discuss reading academic papers effectively, the significance of effect sizes, and the importance of comparing lab versus field studies. They also emphasize the need for control groups to differentiate between real and placebo effects in research.

Eric Barends, Managing Director at the Center for Evidence-Based Management, and Dr. Christina Rader, Associate Professor of Economics and Business, dive into the complexities of practitioner evidence. They highlight key biases like confirmation bias and outcome bias, stressing the importance of critical questioning. Eric outlines three criteria for assessing evidence reliability: experience volume, objective feedback, and stable environments. The duo also discusses how to distinguish evidence from opinion to improve decision-making in dynamic work settings.

In a thought-provoking discussion, Eric Barends, Managing Director of the Center for Evidence-Based Management, focuses on the importance of evaluating outcomes to enhance decision-making. Denise Rousseau, H. J. Heinz University Professor, highlights the value of problem definition before action. Stefanie Nickel, Global Head of Diversity & Inclusion at Sandoz, shares insights from randomized trials, illustrating how simple interventions improved psychological safety. Together, they advocate for routine assessments to foster organizational learning and elevate decision quality.

In this enlightening discussion, Eric Barends, Managing Director at the Center for Evidence-Based Management, emphasizes the importance of utilizing multiple reliable evidence sources in decision-making. Rob Briner, a Professor of Organizational Psychology, delves into the pitfalls of biases and the allure of management fads that often misguide organizations. They tackle how structured approaches can be daunting for leaders and urge a shift towards critically appraising claims from both practitioners and academics. Ultimately, they advocate for an evidence-based strategy to enhance decision quality.

Eric Barends, Managing Director at the Center for Evidence-Based Management, and Martin Walker, Director for Banking & Finance at the same center, dive into evidence-based decision-making. They discuss the crucial differences between data, information, and evidence, and the pitfalls of overtrusting organizational data. Martin highlights how poor system design and siloed data can sabotage decisions. The duo emphasizes ethical concerns in data use and advises on measuring the right metrics rather than just the easy ones. Their insights encourage questioning and appraising evidence more critically.

Join Eric Barends, Denise Rousseau, Jonny Gifford, and Steven ten Have as they dive into the essence of building evidence-based management capacity. Barends outlines three critical levels of influence: individual, peer, and organizational. Rousseau emphasizes the importance of transparency and adequate metrics for continuous learning. Gifford discusses how CIPD enhances HR practices through research. Ten Have highlights the role of data in challenging assumptions, advocating for smarter decision-making in management.

Eric Barends, an expert in evidence-based decision making, joins Denise Rousseau, a leading organizational behavior researcher, Dr. Lisa J Griffiths, CEO of OzChild, and Steven ten Have, a professor of strategy and change. They discuss the vital importance of engaging stakeholders to inform better decision-making processes. From identifying power dynamics among stakeholders to the risks of overlooking their input, they emphasize the need for respectful communication and building relationships ahead of changes. Stakeholders can either enrich or obstruct decisions, showing the necessity of listening to diverse viewpoints.

Eric Barends, Managing Director of the Center for Evidence-Based Management, emphasizes the importance of a practical approach to evidence appraisal. Denise Rousseau from Carnegie Mellon University highlights the precision needed in academic language and the cognitive challenges of adopting new evidence-based practices. Rob Briner from Queen Mary University navigates the messy nature of scientific literature, advising listeners on effective search strategies. Together, they discuss the significance of matching research design to questions and the need for a balanced view of diverse evidence sources.

Join Eric Barends, David Creelman, Stefanie Nickel, and Jonny Gifford as they dive into the complexities of incorporating evidence into decision-making. Eric discusses how to translate research findings into actionable steps, while David emphasizes the importance of early stakeholder buy-in to prevent implementation failures. Stefanie shares insights from Sandoz's trials to enhance psychological safety, demonstrating that simple prompts can make a big difference. Together, they explore the interplay between data and practical application, urging a focus on clarity and impactful interventions.