Rebutting Trent Horn’s Rebuttal of Alex O’Connor

1

Introduction

00:00 • 3min

2

The Infinite Regress Argument for Change

03:16 • 2min

3

The Challenges to Ontological Pluralism

04:55 • 4min

4

The Infinite Regress of Actualizers

09:20 • 2min

5

The Paradox of Hilbert's Hotel

11:32 • 2min

6

The Act Potency Distinction

13:03 • 2min

7

Theism and the Argument From Motion

15:29 • 6min

8

The Four Absurdities of Hilbert's Hotel

21:21 • 3min

9

The Different Potentialities of a Person

24:40 • 4min

10

The Limits of Coffee's Potentials

28:28 • 3min

11

The Infinite Precision of Temperature

31:04 • 5min

12

The Problem With the Argument From Change

35:42 • 5min

13

The Problem With Alex's Argument for Motion

40:15 • 2min

14

The Cosmological Argument for Existential Inertia

41:49 • 5min

15

The Argument From Change May Only Work on an a Theory of Time

47:06 • 2min

16

The Objection to Einstein's Relativity Theory

49:29 • 2min

17

The Opposition to Einstein's Relativity Theory

51:41 • 3min

18

The Importance of Relativity

54:29 • 4min

19

The Theory of Time

58:24 • 4min

20

The Problem With Four-Dimensionalist Eternalysts

01:02:31 • 4min

21

The Importance of Act and Potency

01:06:21 • 2min

22

The Problem With Actualizing Potential

01:08:49 • 3min

23

The Problem With the Aristotelian Proof

01:11:33 • 5min

24

The Impossibility of Infinite Regress

01:16:10 • 2min

25

The Purely Actual Actualizer Must Have Divine Attributes

01:18:01 • 2min

26

The Strange Form of Atheism

01:20:02 • 5min

Rebutting Trent Horn’s Rebuttal of Alex O’Connor | MoR No. 101