The Strange Form of Atheism

If you believe the ultimate foundation of reality sustains all existence but is not made of matter and isn't located in time or space, I don't think that's strange at all. If there were two purely actual actualizers, then neither could be purely actual. Each of them would have to exist in a common framework more basic than either of them. In short, it's just thoroughly unjustified. It would be this framework that ultimately explain reality, not the actualizers. Why can't there be multiple purely actual things if there has to be at least one? And by the way, I've already responded to this quote unquote framework argument in one of my other responses to Trent Horn