Kim Bhasin, a Bloomberg journalist focused on business, and Jamie Salter, a savvy entrepreneur known for revitalizing struggling brands, dive into the decline of Nike and its missteps in direct-to-consumer marketing. They explore how Nike's leadership changes and retail strategy backfired, opening doors for competitors. The conversation also touches on Salter's journey acquiring ‘zombie brands’ in the retail landscape. Finally, they dissect the implications of the DOJ's antitrust case against Visa and what it means for consumers.
Nike's decline in popularity is attributed to a misguided shift from performance footwear to lifestyle shoes during John Donahoe's leadership.
The reduction of retail partnerships limited Nike's visibility and sales, allowing emerging brands to seize market share and thrive.
Celebrity endorsements and innovative brand management strategies, as seen with Authentic Brands Group, are crucial for revitalizing legacy brands and capturing consumer interest.
Deep dives
Nike's Declining Trend
Nike has experienced a significant decline in its popularity and sales, primarily attributed to the tenure of its former CEO, John Donahoe. Under Donahoe, Nike shifted focus from performance footwear to lifestyle-oriented shoes, such as retro models, which initially drove sales but ultimately led to a saturation in the market, causing consumer interest to wane. Following a period of rapid revenue growth where Nike aimed for a $50 billion target, the brand's strategy created a perception of ubiquity that diminished its 'cool' factor among sneaker enthusiasts. As a result, newer brands like Hoka and On have filled the void in the running and lifestyle shoe markets, leaving Nike struggling to regain its former appeal.
Impact of Retail Partnerships
The decision to limit retail partnerships has had a detrimental effect on Nike's market presence. Donahoe's strategy included reducing inventory supplied to traditional retailers like Foot Locker, causing a significant drop in Nike's visibility and sales within these stores. This shift created an opportunity for emerging brands to capitalize on the available shelf space, further eroding Nike's market share. Despite a growing trend towards direct-to-consumer sales, the importance of maintaining robust retail partnerships was highlighted as a critical mistake in Donahoe's leadership approach.
The Evolution of Sneaker Culture
Sneaker culture has evolved significantly, impacting how consumers engage with brands. The peak of hype culture during 2021 and 2022 led to a surge in demand for limited edition releases, but as speculative buying tapered off, Nike's sales of popular models declined. This shift in consumer behavior illustrated a broader trend where limited releases created temporary excitement but failed to sustain long-term loyalty for athletic performance products. Brands that cater to the performance market, such as New Balance, have been successful in blending hype with functionality, demonstrating the need for balance in marketing strategies.
Celebrity Influence and Brand Management
The podcast discusses the influence of celebrity endorsements and brand management in today's market, particularly with Authentic Brands Group (ABG). ABG has successfully acquired and revitalized numerous legacy brands, emphasizing the value of brand identity over operational history. This approach allows ABG to generate revenue through licensing deals without taking on the liabilities that led to these brands’ declines. The contrast between traditional management strategies and ABG's innovative licensing model underscores the importance of brand perception and marketing in the competitive landscape.
Visa's Monopoly and Antitrust Allegations
The Department of Justice's antitrust lawsuit against Visa highlights critical issues regarding its monopoly in the debit card market. Visa holds approximately 60% market share of all debit transactions, with a considerable percentage of cards bearing the Visa logo, creating an uncompetitive environment that restricts merchants' options. This monopoly not only raises concerns about inflated fees but also prompts questions about the fairness of the payment processing industry. As the DOJ moves forward with its case, it aims to challenge Visa's practices that allegedly exploit its market power and lead to higher costs for consumers.
This week: the tragic tale of Nike, Foot Locker, and Bed Bath and Beyond. Bloomberg’s Kim Bhasin joins Felix Salmon, Emily Peck, and Elizabeth Spiersto discuss his recent piece on the downfall of the Nike brand and the peril of direct-to-consumer marketing. Then, they discuss Kim’s other feature on Jamie Salter, the man who made a fortune buying up mall “zombie brands” like Izod and Brook’s Brothers. Finally: The DOJ is suing Visa for monopolistic practices, but will it mean anything or ordinary consumers?
In the Plus bonus mini-episode: Three Mile Island is back, baby! The hosts discuss Mincrosoft’s power purchase agreement that involves switching on the defunct nuclear plant and Americans’ troubled relationship with nuclear in general.
Want more Slate Money? Subscribe to Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of the Slate Money show page. Or, visit slate.com/moneyplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Jared Downing and Cheyna Roth.
Public.com+Public Investing Disclosure: All investing involves risk. Brokerage services for US listed securities, options and bonds in a self-directed brokerage account are offered by Public Investing, member FINRA & SIPC. Not investment advice. Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank.Cryptocurrency trading services are offered by Bakkt Crypto Solutions, LLC (NMLS ID 1828849), which is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the NYSDFS. Cryptocurrency is highly speculative, involves a high degree of risk, and has the potential for loss of the entire amount of an investment. Cryptocurrency holdings are not protected by the FDIC or SIPC. . See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information.