Racial and ethnic classifications in the United States are based on outdated systems that fail to account for increasing diversity and intermarriage within the population.
Self-identification intersects with societal, cultural, and political expectations and can lead to disputes and controversies.
Attitudes towards racial and ethnic identification have evolved over time, reflecting a broader recognition of multiple heritages and the ability to embrace diverse identities.
There is a need to abandon outdated racial classification systems and work towards a post-racial society that focuses on individual merit and character.
Deep dives
Relevance of Racial Classifications in Society
Racial and ethnic classifications in the United States are largely based on the classifications established by the federal government in the 1970s. These classifications were created for data collection purposes, particularly to track discrimination and compliance with anti-discrimination laws. However, these classifications did not anticipate the increasing diversity and intermarriage within the population. As a result, individuals may self-identify with certain racial or ethnic groups without facing much scrutiny. The issue of self-identification becomes more complex when it intersects with societal, cultural, and even political expectations, as seen in cases like Elizabeth Warren's claim of Cherokee ancestry and Tiger Woods' identification as "Cablazian." Different interest groups may also have varying opinions on who should be considered part of a particular racial or ethnic group. While self-identification remains the primary factor, disputes can arise when individuals seek benefits or recognition based on their claimed identity.
Evolution of Racial Classification in the United States
The racial and ethnic classifications that exist today were formalized in the 1970s by the federal government's Statistical Directive Number 15. At the time, the classifications were seen as sufficient for data collection purposes and did not foresee the demographic changes and complexities that would arise in the coming decades. The classifications were not based on anthropological or scientific criteria, but rather on the practical need to gather data and gauge compliance with anti-discrimination laws. The government recognized the limitations and subjectivity of these classifications and explicitly stated that they should not be used for eligibility for any program. However, these classifications have become embedded in society and politics over time, leading to debates and disputes over who should be included or excluded from certain racial or ethnic groups.
Controversies Surrounding Racial Identification
Controversies often arise when individuals claim certain racial or ethnic identities, particularly when it intersects with issues of social advantage, representation, or political affiliation. Examples like Elizabeth Warren's claim of Cherokee ancestry and Tiger Woods' identification as "Cablazian" highlight how self-identification and societal expectations can clash. Interest groups and communities may have their own perspectives on who should be considered part of their group, leading to debates about authenticity and representation. The distinction between self-identification and societal recognition underscores the complexities and subjectivity involved in racial and ethnic classification.
Changing Attitudes and Evolving Definitions
Attitudes towards racial and ethnic identification have evolved over time. The one-drop rule, which considered any African ancestry as definitive of black identity, has gradually given way to a more nuanced understanding. Increasing acceptance and celebration of mixed heritage, as seen in the rise of individuals like Barack Obama and Kamala Harris to prominent positions, reflect changing societal attitudes. The 21st century has witnessed a significant transformation in attitudes towards interracial marriage and racial identity, indicating a broader recognition of multiple heritages and the ability to embrace diverse identities. As society continues to become more diverse, the complexities and nuances of racial identification call for ongoing dialogue and understanding.
Moving Towards a Multiracial American Identity
The podcast episode delves into the idea of a biracial or multiracial identity, discussing how society's perception of this concept has evolved over time. While there were activists in the 90s who highlighted the importance of accepting and acknowledging mixed-race individuals, this idea has become more widely accepted today due to increased interracial relationships and mixing. The speaker expresses optimism about America's trajectory towards a multiracial and multiethnic identity, arguing that the existing classification system hinders the development of a unified American identity. The podcast highlights the increased acceptance of interracial relationships and the shift away from solely categorizing white people as a single group, reflecting a changing societal perspective on race and identity.
The Need to Move Beyond Racial Categories
The podcast episode emphasizes the need to abandon outdated racial classification systems. Drawing examples from history and popular culture, such as advertising campaigns and books, the speaker highlights how these systems have reinforced racial hierarchies and perpetuated discriminatory practices. The episode questions the idea of assigning racial consciousness to white individuals to promote racial equality, arguing that such an approach is counterproductive and contrary to human nature. The speaker advocates for a post-racial society where racial categories lose significance and are not used as a basis for receiving benefits or advantages. This vision is grounded in the belief that eliminating racial classifications and focusing on individual merit and character would lead to a more harmonious and equitable society.
The Drawbacks and Complexities of Reparations
The podcast addresses the topic of reparations, exploring the complex challenges and implications that arise when trying to implement such a program. While acknowledging the historical injustices faced by African Americans, the episode raises concerns about determining who would be eligible for reparations and how the distribution of funds would be decided. The speaker points out the difficulty of accurately identifying descendants of slaves and the potential pitfalls of relying on government programs to address past grievances. The episode questions whether reparations would truly bring about justice and equality, suggesting that the energy and resources invested into reparations could be better utilized in addressing broader socio-economic issues and promoting inclusive policies for the benefit of all individuals.
Shermer and Bernstein discuss: the SCOTUS case on affirmative action and race preferences at Harvard and elsewhere • Elizabeth Warren (Cherokee ancestry — Bureau of Indian Affairs rejects?) • Tiger Woods: Cablinasian (European, African, Thai, Chinese ancestry) • George Zimmerman (Hispanic, half Hispanic, mixed-race, White Hispanic, White, or…?) • Rachel Dolezal (NAACP official, adopted an African American identity, though has none) • Kamala Harris (child of an Indian immigrant mother, father of mixed-African and European heritage from Jamaica) • BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) • ADOS (American Descendants of Slaves) • the biology and legality of race • the one-drop rule of race classification • the rise of modern racial classification • Hispanic, Italian, Polish, Jewish, Armenian, Cajun, South Asian, Arab, and Iranian categories • American Indians/Native Americans • race classification and reparations • How can we achieve a race-blind society?
David E. Bernstein holds a University Professorship chair at the Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, where he has been teaching since 1995. He has also been a visiting professor at the University of Michigan, Georgetown University, William and Mary, Brooklyn Law School, and the University of Turin. Known as a fearless contrarian, Professor Bernstein often challenges the conventional wisdom with prodigious research and sharp, original analysis. His book Rehabilitating Lochner was praised across the political spectrum as “intellectual history in its highest form,” a “fresh perspective and a cogent analysis,” “delightful and informative,” “sharp and iconoclastic,” “well-written and destined to be influential,” and “a terrific work of historical revisionism.” Professor Bernstein blogs at the Volokh Conspiracy (the leading law professor blog) and at Instapundit.com. Professor Bernstein is a graduate of the Yale Law School, where he was senior editor of the Yale Law Journal and a John M. Olin Fellow in Law, Economics, and Public Policy. Professor Bernstein is married and has three children of mixed Eastern European, Middle Eastern, and Spanish-Jewish origin. He prefers not to classify them.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
