Strict Scrutiny

Unprincipled and Inconsistent Voting Rights Shenanigans

Sep 19, 2022

52:43

Creator website

Highlights

AI Chapters

Episode notes

The Supreme Court Wants to Rethink Race and Redistricting

05:10

The Relationship Between Race and Election Law

05:54

How to Avoid Confusion in the Lead Up to an Election

04:22

Introduction

2min

The Supreme Court and the Legal Culture Around It

3min

Purcel in the Pandemic

2min

How to Avoid Confusion in the Lead Up to an Election

4min

The Supreme Court Says, We Are Going to a Stay the Day Before the Election

4min

Is the Right to Vote Impaired?

3min

The Supreme Court Says, You Can't Enforce This Poll Tax

3min

Alabama Cannot Ban Curb Side Voting

2min

The Court's Relationship to Democracy

2min

10.

Is the Court's Equitable Discrimination a Political Action?

2min

11.

Super Food Complete Dog Food by Katherine Higels

6min

12.

The Relationship Between Race and Election Law

6min

13.

The Supreme Court Wants to Rethink Race and Redistricting

5min

14.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court Is Taking the Fear of Purcell Into Account

4min

15.

Alabama Voting Rights Act

4min

16.

Are You Trying to Change the Standards for Equitable Remedies?

3min

17.

The Supreme Court's Purcell Is a Threat to Our Democracy

3min

Leah talks with Wilfred Codrington III about his article, "Purcell in Pandemic," which appeared in the NYU Law Review. The Purcell Principle comes from a 2006 Supreme Court case about what makes an appropriate timeline for changing election laws. The principle wasn't clear to begin with, and has only gotten more confusing in litigation surrounding the 2020 election. Will we see it continue to play out in this year's midterms?