The hosts tackle the latest from the Trump administration, humorously critiquing power consolidation and its impact on federal workers. They examine contentious Supreme Court cases, including reverse discrimination, and the implications of controversial health policies. A significant legal battle regarding Mr. Glossop sheds light on prosecutorial duties and judicial dynamics. They also explore complexities in employment discrimination, calling attention to shifting legal interpretations and the need for inclusivity in the system.

In this insightful conversation, Professor Kate Masur, an award-winning historian and expert on the 14th Amendment, joins the hosts to discuss the legality of Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship. She provides historical context, debunking modern misconceptions and emphasizing the foundational role of citizenship in U.S. law. The discussion also touches on SCOTUS cases, the implications of recent executive actions, and the importance of understanding the historical roots of citizenship rights.

Dive into the chaos of the Trump administration as the hosts unpack growing concerns over government corruption and ethics. They tackle alarming legal changes, including the gutting of key consumer protections and the DOJ's questionable actions. Gender politics take center stage, critiquing the administration's impact on women's rights. Amidst the turmoil, the discussion highlights the importance of activism and hope for a better future. It's a critical exploration of where legal landscapes meet impending constitutional crises.

Jonathan Gienapp, a law and history professor at Stanford and author of "Against Constitutional Originalism," dives into the fraught relationship between originalism and historical interpretation. He critiques how originalists overlook founding intentions and the dynamic nature of law. The conversation also highlights the troubling influences of tech billionaires in politics and the implications of youth culture in governance. Gienapp emphasizes the importance of civic engagement and a more nuanced understanding of constitutional principles for a healthy democracy.

The hosts dive deep into Trump's controversial dismissals of inspectors general, revealing a troubling pattern of lawlessness. They dissect the chaotic fallout within the Justice Department and examine the implications of executive orders targeting the transgender community. The discussion also covers a tragic plane crash linked to regulatory rollbacks and critiques the impact of private interests on government integrity. Tackling voting rights and the recent election disputes in North Carolina and Wisconsin adds to the urgency of these pressing issues.

The hosts delve into the onslaught of executive orders from the Trump administration, dissecting their impacts on immigration, gender equality, and marginalized groups. They explore the contradictions within these orders and discuss the Supreme Court's recent decisions, including a notable case regarding TikTok and data privacy. Listener questions spark lively debates on regulatory challenges and the courts' role in countering authoritarianism. All this unfolds amidst an examination of the societal consequences of these policies and the importance of corporate accountability in DEI initiatives.

Dive into the humorous chaos surrounding a Supreme Court case involving Pornhub and the unexpected legal debates that arise. The discussion touches on Biden's declaration about the Equal Rights Amendment, revealing its significance for women's rights. Insightful critiques on judicial corruption and the Republican fixation on pornography follow, paired with amusing courtroom exchanges about content regulation. Explore justices' misunderstandings of U.S. versus European laws and Justice Kagan's take on First Amendment rights in an entertaining yet informative ride.

The podcast kicks off with a unanimous Supreme Court ruling to uphold the TikTok ban, igniting debates about social media regulations. The hosts reveal mixed feelings about the app's potential demise and its cultural significance. They explore the balance between national security and free speech rights, critiquing the rushed decision and its implications for personal expression. In a lighter moment, a farewell to a personal 'Chinese spy' adds humor to the discussion, all while hinting at broader themes of censorship and the shifting landscape of social media platforms.

Michelle Adams, a University of Michigan law professor and author of "The Containment," joins the hosts to explore pressing legal issues. They delve into TikTok’s potential legal troubles tied to national security and First Amendment rights. The discussion also critiques Donald Trump's unique legal strategies and the implications of recent Supreme Court dynamics. Adams shares insights from her work on racial justice, linking historical cases to contemporary challenges within the judiciary and highlighting the ongoing battle for educational equity.

Lindsay Chervinsky, a historian and executive director of the George Washington Presidential Library, and Corey Brettschneider, a political science professor at Brown University, delve into the evolution of presidential power. They explore the historical context of January 6th and its implications for democracy. Chervinsky highlights John Adams' struggles in shaping the presidency, while Brettschneider discusses the founding fathers' intent to limit authority to prevent tyranny. Together, they analyze how dissent and accountability remain vital in preserving democratic values today.