U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin shares insights on the ethical dilemmas posed by the Supreme Court and ways Congress can hold it accountable. Activist Amanda Zurawski, known for her pivotal case against anti-abortion laws, discusses her personal tragic experiences and the broader implications of restrictive reproductive rights in Texas. The conversation also highlights pressing issues of voter suppression and the importance of solidarity in the fight for democracy and women's rights.

Emily Passini from the ACLU, Professor Kimberly Thomas from Michigan, and Justice Allison Riggs from North Carolina discuss the critical nature of state supreme court elections this year. They delve into the impact of these races on vital issues like reproductive rights and voting access. The conversation also examines the duty of justices to uphold judicial integrity amid partisan pressures and highlights the challenges of maintaining independence in a politically charged environment. Engagement and informed voting are emphasized as key to shaping the future of justice.

Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian and author known for her insights on authoritarianism, joins the discussion to unpack Project 2025. She highlights its alarming push toward centralized power and the threat it poses to democracy. Ben-Ghiat critiques the proposed tax policies, which favor the wealthy, and warns about the erosion of civil liberties. The conversation also touches on the manipulation of social media and the need for grassroots action to safeguard democratic values. A call to vigilance echoes throughout this timely and urgent dialogue.

Meredith Marks, a Northwestern Law School graduate and star of The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City, joins the discussion to navigate the intriguing crossover between law and reality TV. The conversation dives into the alarming foreign policy ambitions of Project 2025, exploring risks to national security and ethical dilemmas in military operations. Reflecting on her personal journey, Meredith shares how law school experiences shaped her reality TV persona. The episode wraps up with playful imaginings of Supreme Court justices navigating the drama of a reality show.

Julia Kaye is a senior staff attorney at the ACLU, and Fatima Goss Graves is the president and CEO of the National Women’s Law Center Action Fund. They delve into the aftermath of the Dobbs decision, emphasizing its severe impact on reproductive rights and healthcare access. The discussion reveals personal stories of women facing devastating medical challenges due to restrictive legislation. They highlight the pressing need for advocacy against misinformation and reflect on future challenges, underscoring the urgency for political engagement to safeguard reproductive freedoms.

Jon Lovett, a political commentator, joins notable author J.D. Vance to navigate the controversial waters of Project 2025. They humorously unpack its implications on women's rights and societal changes. Olivia Warren and Deeva Shah delve into serious judicial misconduct, exposing the troubling case against Judge Joshua Kindred and the systemic challenges in addressing harassment. The discussion highlights the need for accountability in the judiciary while reflecting on the broader political landscape and upcoming reforms.

Dylan C. Penningroth, an acclaimed author known for uncovering the hidden history of Black civil rights, joins the conversation. He discusses his book, which brings to light the often-ignored contributions of ordinary Black individuals in legal battles from the 1830s to the 1970s. The dialogue dives into how these early efforts were foundational to the civil rights movement. The team also critiques Project 2025, unraveling its radical proposals and highlighting the tension between liberty and governance in America.

Legal experts Josie Duffy Rice, Kathrina Szymborski Wolfkot, and writer Kyle Barry discuss relying on state courts and state constitutional law in addressing criminal legal system challenges. They delve into the hubris and hackery of Judge Aileen Cannon's decision on the Trump classified documents case, highlighting the promises and challenges of state courts in enforcing rights against extreme punishments and shaping federal law.

Jonathan Van Ness joins the hosts to dissect Josh Hawley's book on masculinity and conservative views. They critique Hawley's controversial actions and policies, discuss biblical archetypes for men, and analyze the intersection of religious beliefs with political decisions. The conversation also touches on the attractiveness of political figures and recent Supreme Court rulings.

Reflecting on a tumultuous Supreme Court term, the hosts discuss hollowing out the administrative state, dodges on abortion, and immunity for corrupt ex-presidents. They delve into court interpretations, biased outcomes, textualism, and upcoming summer episodes.