Lisa Lerer and Elizabeth Dias, both New York Times correspondents, delve into their book, exploring the fall of Roe v. Wade and the anti-abortion movement's strategic rise in American politics. They discuss the implications for women's rights and the shifting landscape of reproductive health. David Pozen, a Columbia Law professor, joins in to analyze how the war on drugs intersects with constitutional law, revealing the historical challenges and ongoing fights for individual liberties. It's a gripping look at the evolving American legal and political landscape.

Dive into the turbulent waters of recent Supreme Court decisions affecting environmental policy, particularly the EPA's battle over water quality in San Francisco. The hosts debate the implications of legal rulings on immigration and veterans' benefits, adding unexpected humor with a viral baby hippo reference. Political speech, voting rights, and reproductive justice also take center stage, underscoring the complex interplay between law and current events as the nation gears up for upcoming elections.

The hosts dive into the Supreme Court's recent discussions around ghost guns and civil rights, showcasing dramatic moments like Justices Alito and Kagan's tension. They analyze rulings affecting abortion laws, emphasizing the federal versus state dynamics. The podcast highlights the comedic yet serious courtroom debates about the legal status of ghost guns, making the complex legal landscape accessible. Listeners can expect engaging commentary on the implications of these cases for voting and civil rights, all wrapped up in a lively discussion.

Jonathan Kanter and Doha Mekki from the DOJ's Antitrust Division dive into how antitrust law can drive progressive social change. They discuss the implications of unregulated ghost guns and their impact on public safety. Kanter emphasizes the role of young progressives in advocating for antitrust enforcement as a means to promote equity, touching on its intersections with labor rights and healthcare. The conversation unveils a fascinating perspective on using legal frameworks to address systemic inequalities and empower communities.

The hosts explore the upcoming Supreme Court term, emphasizing potential challenges surrounding gender-affirming care for trans minors and regulations on ghost guns. They analyze recent SCOTUS decisions impacting reproductive rights and gerrymandering, while also highlighting legal battles over voting access. The discussion reflects on the serious implications of these cases for civil rights and public safety, connecting them to broader narratives in governance. Expect a tumultuous term ahead with far-reaching consequences.

Pamela Karlan, co-director of Stanford’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic and a seasoned advocate, joins the discussion alongside Madiba K. Dennie, author of The Originalism Trap. They explore the remarkable influence of Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar in the Supreme Court, her adept handling of complex cases like the Idaho healthcare law, and the dialogue surrounding originalism's rigid frameworks. The conversation also delves into the need for reforms in the Supreme Court to foster equity and representation, highlighting how grassroots movements can shape constitutional rights.

Rebecca Nagle, an author dedicated to Native land justice, discusses her new book exploring the historic and ongoing struggles of Indigenous rights. Law professors Reva Siegel and Mary Ziegler join the conversation, delving into the Comstock Act's oppressive legacy and its resurgence in today's debates on reproductive rights. They highlight its impact on women's voices throughout history and how current legal landscapes reflect outdated censorship laws. The discussion reveals the deep interconnectedness of legal systems, identity, and justice in both Native rights and reproductive freedom.

U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin shares insights on the ethical dilemmas posed by the Supreme Court and ways Congress can hold it accountable. Activist Amanda Zurawski, known for her pivotal case against anti-abortion laws, discusses her personal tragic experiences and the broader implications of restrictive reproductive rights in Texas. The conversation also highlights pressing issues of voter suppression and the importance of solidarity in the fight for democracy and women's rights.

Emily Passini from the ACLU, Professor Kimberly Thomas from Michigan, and Justice Allison Riggs from North Carolina discuss the critical nature of state supreme court elections this year. They delve into the impact of these races on vital issues like reproductive rights and voting access. The conversation also examines the duty of justices to uphold judicial integrity amid partisan pressures and highlights the challenges of maintaining independence in a politically charged environment. Engagement and informed voting are emphasized as key to shaping the future of justice.

Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian and author known for her insights on authoritarianism, joins the discussion to unpack Project 2025. She highlights its alarming push toward centralized power and the threat it poses to democracy. Ben-Ghiat critiques the proposed tax policies, which favor the wealthy, and warns about the erosion of civil liberties. The conversation also touches on the manipulation of social media and the need for grassroots action to safeguard democratic values. A call to vigilance echoes throughout this timely and urgent dialogue.