Gavel Gavel

GG20 - Part 20 of LvB is Part 10 of Wayfarer et al v The New York Times Now that we've finished the... facts... it's time to actually analyze the law, and to do that, we're going to summon our attorney Anne Linder! How do the legal claims in this complaint stack up? Is there any there there?  

GG19 - Part 19 of LvB is Part 9 of Wayfarer et al v The New York Times We've made it! The last parts of this complaint actually talk about The New York Times (you know, the defendant in this case) a little and we give our closing thoughts on the Wayfarer's telling of this whole story. Next up: LAWYER PORTAL! This is the complaint we're working from if you want to follow along. Support the show, get rid of ads, and get bonus stuff over on patreon.com/gavelpod! This content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org.

GG18 - Part 18 of LvB is Part 8 of Wayfarer et al v The New York Times We're getting closer and closer! Join us as we examine a number of 'graphs related to the editing bay, the different versions of the film, and other post-production goings-on, including Sony's response throughout. We also talk about the premiere from Baldoni's perspective from the theater's basement, and his engagement with Melissa Nathan's The Agency Group to manage crisis PR in the fallout post-premiere. There's a ton to talk about in this one! This is the complaint we're working from if you want to follow along. Support the show, get rid of ads, and get bonus stuff over on patreon.com/gavelpod! This content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org.

GG17 - Part 17 of LvB is Part 7 of Wayfarer et al v The New York Times That's right! Let's hear how the Wayfarer folks present the 17-point list from Blake Lively's lawyers during the filming of It Ends With Us. Before we get into the attorney-drafted protections for return to production, we also dig into the Wayfarer spin on the circumstances when Lively alleged Baldoni and Heath did not respect her privacy in her trailer while she was breastfeeding and pumping. This is the complaint we're working from if you want to follow along. Support the show, get rid of ads, and get bonus stuff over on patreon.com/gavelpod! This content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org.

GG16 - Part 16 of LvB is Part 6 of Wayfarer et al v The New York Times We dig into some key defenses from the Wayfarer parties, including Baldoni's intentions in asking a trainer on the film about Lively's weight, Lively's supposed production "takeover" through script revisions (and how her husband, Ryan Reynolds, was involved with those pages), as well as Wayfarer's position regarding Lively's concerns about the intimacy coordinator's involvement during filming. Stay for the outro to hear some extra digging! This is the complaint we're working from if you want to follow along. Support the show, get rid of ads, and get bonus stuff over on patreon.com/gavelpod! This content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org.

GG15 - Part 15 of LvB is Part 5 of Wayfarer et al v The New York Times We've made it through...the INTRODUCTION! There's plenty more to dig into, and this episode focuses on the behavior during post-production between the parties. Complete with more screenshots! Some are even legible! This is the complaint we're working from if you want to follow along. Support the show, get rid of ads, and get bonus stuff over on patreon.com/gavelpod! This content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org.

The discussion dives into the intricate legal battles surrounding a harassment case, analyzing the complexities of Baldoni's claims against Lively. The hosts tackle sensationalized allegations from a New York Times article, emphasizing ethical dilemmas in creative environments. They explore the importance of privacy and consent, particularly regarding uncomfortable comments within the industry. Controversies around workplace dynamics and retaliation claims spark debate over power struggles in Hollywood, culminating in a critical look at the absurdities of a defamation complaint.

Dive into the seedy underbelly of Hollywood tabloids as the hosts dissect internal PR strategies tied to serious allegations. They unpack the complexities of reporter's privilege and the challenges of truth in media narratives surrounding sexual assault. The conversation reveals the intricacies of managing reputations during controversies, showcasing contradictory internal communications from a celebrity's team. With humor and critique, they scrutinize a flawed legal complaint, exposing baseless claims and manipulations that shape public perception.

This installment dives into the notorious emoji that sparked a whirlwind of media attention. The hosts dissect the implications of a missing upside-down smiley face in a New York Times article, exploring how digital communication can twist perceptions. The lively banter touches on Hollywood drama between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, looking at the nuances of text exchanges and public relations. Additionally, they reflect on gender roles in film promotion, revealing how societal perceptions shape narratives, all intertwined with humor and audience interaction.

A deep dive into the legal battle against the New York Times reveals complex defamation challenges faced by plaintiffs from Wayfair. The discussion critiques journalistic integrity, especially regarding a controversial article's timing. Media manipulation and the role of celebrity allegations are explored, exposing how narratives shift in the public eye. The hosts analyze communication intricacies while hinting at the dramatic legal narratives to come, keeping listeners eagerly awaiting emoji revelations.