Gavel Gavel Lively v. Baldoni 45 - FINE. If I Can't Sexually Harass While Making a Movie Then I Don't Even Want to DO IT
Nov 13, 2025
Blake Lively's behind-the-scenes demands for a film production spark intriguing discussions about creative control and safety. The hosts analyze her calls for an A-list producer, the use of stunt doubles for sensitive scenes, and provisions for young actors. They dive into the complexities of contract negotiations and perceived power dynamics, highlighting how women's contributions can be misinterpreted. Lively's editing involvement and the responses to her demands reveal a deeper layer of the filmmaking process, blending artistry with advocacy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Neutral Oversight Contradicts Takeover Claim
- Blake Lively requested neutral Sony oversight on set, which undermines claims she was trying to seize control.
- The hosts argue this suggests her demands were protective and collaborative, not power grabs.
More Producers Meant Safety, Not Control
- Lively pushed for adding experienced producers to supervise safety and logistics rather than consolidate power.
- Hosts view this as good-faith efforts to professionalize a chaotic production environment.
Intimacy Protections Were Agreed And Followed
- Lively insisted on stunt/body doubles and limits for sexual-violence scenes, and Wayfair agreed then complied.
- Hosts see agreement and later conduct as corroborating her safety concerns.