Open to Debate
Open to Debate
America is more divided than ever—but it doesn’t have to be. Open to Debate offers an antidote to the chaos. We bring multiple perspectives together for real, nonpartisan debates. Debates that are structured, respectful, clever, provocative, and driven by the facts. Open to Debate is on a mission to restore balance to the public square through expert moderation, good-faith arguments, and reasoned analysis. We examine the issues of the day with the world’s most influential thinkers spanning science, technology, politics, culture, and global affairs. It’s time to build a stronger, more united democracy with the civil exchange of ideas. Be open-minded. Be curious. Be ready to listen. Join us in being Open to Debate. (Formerly Intelligence Squared U.S.)
Episodes
Mentioned books
37 snips
Mar 7, 2025 • 53min
Is Musk’s DOGE Dodging the Law?
In this engaging discussion, Michael W. McConnell, a former U.S. Court of Appeals Judge and law professor at Stanford, debates the legality of Elon Musk's actions involving DOGE. He examines the intricate legal dynamics and potential conflicts of interest stemming from Musk’s government role. The conversation dives into constitutional concerns, the impacts of technology on legality, and accountability within the Trump administration. McConnell’s insights challenge assumptions about governance and ethics, making for a thought-provoking exchange.
4 snips
Mar 5, 2025 • 1h 1min
PODCAST BONUS RELEASE: Is it Time to End Daylight Savings Time?
Joan Costa-i-Font, a health economist at the London School of Economics, and Binyamin Appelbaum, a member of the New York Times editorial board, dive into a lively debate about the relevance of Daylight Savings Time. Costa-i-Font argues that the time change harms health and productivity, while Appelbaum defends its role in enhancing our quality of life. They explore the historical origins, public sentiment, and legislative challenges surrounding this timekeeping practice, making a compelling case for why it's time to rethink the clock.
23 snips
Feb 28, 2025 • 53min
Was Trump Right to Increase Tariffs on Chinese Imports?
Stephen Moore, an economist and senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, argue for tariffs as essential tools for national security and supporting domestic production. On the opposing side, Jennifer Hillman from the Council on Foreign Relations highlights their potential economic harm and legal issues, while Rana Mitter from Harvard emphasizes the ineffectiveness of tariffs and advocates for alternative strategies. The discussion delves into the complex landscape of trade policies and their implications for U.S.-China relations.
15 snips
Feb 21, 2025 • 53min
Can Religion Cure the Loneliness Epidemic?
In a thought-provoking conversation, Harold Koenig, Director at Duke University’s Center for Spirituality, explores how religion may provide social support to combat loneliness. Senator Chris Murphy highlights the global loneliness crisis, advocating for community solutions. In contrast, Ruth Whippman argues for secular approaches as more inclusive, while Dan Barker critiques the potential alienation caused by organized religion. Together, they tackle the complex interplay between faith, community, and mental health in today's society.
27 snips
Feb 14, 2025 • 53min
Is It Time to Break Up with Dating Apps?
In this engaging discussion, Maria Avgitidis, a seasoned matchmaker and CEO of Agape Match, debates with Melissa Hobley, Global CMO of Tinder. They dive into the paradox of choice in dating apps and the quest for authentic connections. Avgitidis argues that these platforms lead to superficial interactions, while Hobley highlights their convenience and success stories. The conversation also touches on Gen Z's desire for genuine relationships and the shifting norms in modern dating. Tune in for a lively exploration of whether it's time to say goodbye to dating apps!
11 snips
Feb 7, 2025 • 53min
UNRESOLVED: The Future of the Supreme Court
Join former Senator Jeff Flake, law professors Cristina Rodríguez and Jamal Greene, and ex-Attorney General Jeff Sessions as they tackle the future of the Supreme Court. They debate the contentious idea of term limits for justices, weighing potential benefits against risks of politicization. The conversation delves into judicial independence, external ethics codes, and the implications of expanding the court. The guests also address the striking trust gap between political parties and explore historical factors affecting the court’s legitimacy.
26 snips
Jan 31, 2025 • 53min
Has Legalizing Sports Gambling Become a Bad Bet?
Harry Levant, Director of Gambling Policy at the Public Health Advocacy Institute and certified gambling therapist, dives into the heated debate on legalizing sports gambling. He shares insights on the rise of gambling addiction and its impact on public health. The dialogue contrasts the economic benefits of legalization with ethical concerns and the risks to vulnerable populations. Personal stories of loss highlight the addiction crisis, while discussions reveal the need for effective regulation and collaboration to ensure safer gambling practices.
15 snips
Jan 24, 2025 • 53min
Prescription Weight Loss Drugs for All?
David Allison, an obesity researcher and distinguished professor at Indiana University, argues for universal access to weight loss drugs like GLP-1 agonists. In contrast, Stuart W. Flint, Associate Professor at the University of Leeds, calls for further research before widespread use. They delve into ethical dilemmas, balancing personal choice with societal responsibility, and discuss the risks of side effects versus the necessity of these medications for effective weight management. The conversation invites reflection on health implications for diverse populations.
40 snips
Jan 17, 2025 • 53min
Could Identity Politics Help Democrats Engage Men?
Jackson Katz, an educator and co-founder of the Young Men's Research Institute, teams up with Thomas Chatterton Williams, a staff writer at The Atlantic and visiting professor, to debate the role of identity politics in engaging male voters. They discuss the unique challenges facing men today, including health and education issues. Katz advocates for addressing men's narratives to reconnect with them, while Williams warns that focusing on identity could deepen divisions. The conversation dives deep into the need for inclusive narratives that resonate across diverse male experiences.
15 snips
Jan 14, 2025 • 55min
PODCAST BONUS RELEASE: Should the U.S. Ban TikTok?
Kori Schake, a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and Milton Mueller, a Professor at Georgia Tech, dive into the heated debate over the potential ban on TikTok. Schake argues from a national security perspective, highlighting espionage fears linked to its Chinese ownership. In contrast, Mueller defends the app's value for free expression and creativity, questioning government censorship. Together, they navigate the complex balance between privacy concerns and First Amendment rights, probing the implications for 170 million American users.
