Open to Debate PODCAST BONUS RELEASE: Is it Time to End Daylight Savings Time?
4 snips
Mar 5, 2025 Joan Costa-i-Font, a health economist at the London School of Economics, and Binyamin Appelbaum, a member of the New York Times editorial board, dive into a lively debate about the relevance of Daylight Savings Time. Costa-i-Font argues that the time change harms health and productivity, while Appelbaum defends its role in enhancing our quality of life. They explore the historical origins, public sentiment, and legislative challenges surrounding this timekeeping practice, making a compelling case for why it's time to rethink the clock.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Health Impacts of DST
- Daylight Saving Time (DST) negatively impacts health, increasing heart attacks, accidents, and suicides.
- This is likely due to sleep deprivation and disruption of the body's natural rhythms.
DST's True Purpose
- DST's original purpose was to maximize daylight hours for leisure activities, not energy savings.
- Proponents argue it allows for more post-work sunlight enjoyment.
Germany's Adoption of DST
- Germany adopted DST during World War I to save coal for the war effort.
- This highlights the historical context of energy-saving arguments.