Open to Debate UNRESOLVED: The Future of the Supreme Court
11 snips
Feb 7, 2025 
Join former Senator Jeff Flake, law professors Cristina Rodríguez and Jamal Greene, and ex-Attorney General Jeff Sessions as they tackle the future of the Supreme Court. They debate the contentious idea of term limits for justices, weighing potential benefits against risks of politicization. The conversation delves into judicial independence, external ethics codes, and the implications of expanding the court. The guests also address the striking trust gap between political parties and explore historical factors affecting the court’s legitimacy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Term Limits and Democratic Responsiveness
- Term limits for Supreme Court justices would regularize appointments, distributing political influence more evenly.
- This would make the court's composition reflect election outcomes better.
Current System's Effectiveness
- The Supreme Court currently functions effectively, and term limits might politicize appointments further.
- The average tenure is already shorter than proposed term limits, making the reform unnecessary.
Power Concentration and Term Limits
- Lifetime appointments on the Supreme Court concentrate excessive power in a few individuals.
- Term limits would distribute this power more democratically and reduce the influence of "swing justices."