Ruth Igielnik

Lenny Bronner, a Senior data scientist at The Washington Post, and Ruth Igielnik, Polling editor at The New York Times, discuss the Democratic Party's record low public favorability. They analyze polling data that reveals a rift among Democrats themselves regarding their party's direction. Topics include the historical context of political wilderness and strategies for reconnecting with core voters. The conversation also covers the recent political landscape in Germany, showcasing how shifts in public opinion can influence party dynamics.

Senior elections analyst Nathaniel Rakich and New York Times polling editor Ruth Igielnik analyze the first presidential debate between Biden and Trump. They discuss the impact on voter perceptions, Harris' electability, and the focus on taxes vs. inflation in campaign strategies.

Mary Radcliffe, a Senior researcher at FiveThirtyEight, and Ruth Igielnik, a New York Times polling editor, dive into the frenzied world of last-minute polling. They discuss the surprising Iowa Poll that paints a hopeful picture for Kamala Harris and reveal key findings from New York Times battleground surveys that challenge common trends. The conversation highlights the unpredictability of voter sentiment, the challenges of poll accuracy, and the implications of late deciders as Election Day approaches.

Nathaniel Rakich, a senior elections analyst, and Ruth Igielnik, a New York Times polling editor, dive into the evolving dynamics of the Harris-Trump showdown. They discuss the rising enthusiasm among Democrats for Kamala Harris in battleground states. The conversation highlights Trump’s claims about biased polling and explores the phenomenon of 'poll denialism.' As they analyze voter perceptions and the implications of recent polling data, they also unveil engaging insights into the complexities of political identity and campaign strategies.

Senior elections analyst Nathaniel Rakich and New York Times polling editor Ruth Igielnik discuss post-Trump polling trends and Biden's asylum order. They play election trivia drawing parallels to current politics.