Manifold

Richard Sander (UCLA Law) on the Supreme Court Affirmative Action Ruling — #38

Jul 1, 2023
Ask episode
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1
Introduction
00:00 • 2min
2
The Momentum Shift in Justices' Position on Affirmative Action
02:28 • 2min
3
Harvard and UNC's Preferences Experiment Was a Success
04:04 • 2min
4
The Supreme Court's Decision to Carve-Out Preferences
06:21 • 2min
5
Harvard Emergency v. Harvard Emergency to Violate the 14th Amendment
07:57 • 2min
6
The Power of Racial Preferences in the 14th Amendment
10:00 • 5min
7
Harvard and UCLA Are Going to Coach Black Applicants to Merely Rehearse Some Standard Trope About How They've Overcome a Lot
15:00 • 2min
8
The Challenges to the University's Back Door Method
16:59 • 3min
9
The Harvard Decision to Use Diversity to Preserve Diversity
19:54 • 2min
10
The Race-Blind Admissions Process in California
21:26 • 2min
11
The Impact of Cheating on Colleges
23:17 • 2min
12
The Decline of the Black Population at Berkeley and UCLA
24:58 • 4min
13
The Mismatch Effect at UC
28:29 • 4min
14
Harvard and UNC: A Remedy Phase
32:10 • 2min
15
The Supreme Court's Decision in SFFA
33:42 • 2min
16
Judge Rose's Moral Commitment to Harvard in the Aftermath of the Boston Decision
35:39 • 2min
17
The Effects of the SAT on College Admissions
37:32 • 4min
18
The Politics of the School's Response to the Decision
41:26 • 2min
19
The Importance of Model Legislation for State Legislatures
43:12 • 4min