
Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg Beyond the assumption that humans are rational (with Barry Schwartz)
11 snips
Oct 22, 2025 Barry Schwartz, an emeritus psychology professor and author, discusses the limitations of rational choice theory and the complexities of decision-making. He critiques how quantification often overshadows important values that can't be easily measured, suggesting that relying on numbers can mislead us. Schwartz emphasizes the importance of framing decisions correctly and acknowledges the interplay between intuition and reflection. He also highlights how diverse perspectives can expose blind spots, ultimately advocating for a richer definition of rationality.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Spreadsheet Model Of Rationality Is Limited
- Rational choice theory models decisions as quantifiable expected-utility calculations across fixed options.
- Many real-life values and uncertainties resist this reduction, making the model limited.
Counting Replaces Thinking
- Simplifying complex decisions into quantifiable attributes substitutes counting for genuine thinking.
- This quantification shifts attention toward what is measurable rather than what truly matters.
Incommensurability Undermines One-Scale Choices
- Not every value is comparable on a single scale; rational choice assumes commensurability.
- Forcing a common scale distorts incommensurable goods and risks flattening moral distinctions.







