Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, co-authors of 'How Democracies Die', dive into the threats against democratic institutions today. They discuss how leaders can erode norms, using global examples, including Venezuela under Hugo Chavez. The conversation touches on historical parallels with authoritarian regimes, such as Hitler's rise, and the moral leadership needed to combat radicalism. Political polarization's impact on American democracy is examined alongside its effects on governance and trust, emphasizing the evolving challenges faced by political parties amidst rising partisanship.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Democracies are increasingly endangered by elected leaders who gradually erode institutions rather than through overtly violent methods like coups.
Authoritarian leaders obscure their power grabs behind democratic facades by manipulating electoral processes and undermining legal institutions.
The deterioration of political parties' candidate selection abilities fuels the rise of demagogues, threatening the viability of democratic norms and governance.
Deep dives
The Evolution of Democratic Breakdown
Democracies can die in various ways, but recent trends indicate a shift from classical military coups to the erosion of democratic institutions by elected leaders. Modern examples illustrate this phenomenon, where politicians utilize their democratic mandate to undermine the very frameworks that enable democracy. The authors emphasize that this process is often gradual, making it difficult for citizens to recognize when their democracy is under threat. They argue that this chipping away at democracy occurs under the guise of democratic practices, obscuring the reality of what is happening.
Understanding Authoritarian Strategies
The podcast discusses specific strategies employed by authoritarian leaders to maintain power while appearing legitimate. Such tactics include manipulating electoral institutions, purging legal authorities, and stacking the judiciary, often rationalized as necessary for stability. Historical examples, like Viktor Orban's tactics in Hungary and Hugo Chavez's tactics in Venezuela, demonstrate how seemingly democratic leaders can transform systems to entrench their authority. This gradual process often leaves citizens unaware that their democracy is diminishing, as elections continue without true democratic substance.
The Role of Political Parties in Democracy
Political parties serve not just as vehicles for political opinion but also as critical filters against the rise of demagogues. Traditionally, party leaders were able to guide the selection of candidates, ensuring that the most competent individuals prevailed. However, the podcast highlights how this filtration process has deteriorated over time, particularly in the context of changing voter behavior and populist sentiments. As parties lose their ability to effectively manage candidate selection, the risk of demagogues gaining support increases, raising existential questions about the future of democratic norms.
Polarization and Its Consequences
Increasing polarization within American politics has rendered the political landscape more treacherous for democratic functioning. The authors note that when parties adopt extreme positions and view each other as existential threats, forbearance—the practice of restraint—becomes increasingly difficult to maintain. This environment pressures politicians to prioritize aggressive tactics over cooperative governance, jeopardizing democratic stability. The potential for a spiral of democratic erosion is high as both parties feel compelled to abandon norms in favor of short-term gains and ideological dominance.
The Danger of Eroding Democratic Norms
The podcast underscores the importance of democratic norms such as mutual toleration and forbearance, with a focus on their erosion as political dynamics shift. As parties engage in constitutional hardball—where they manipulate rules to secure power—there lies a risk that the broader democratic framework may become compromised. The discussion reflects a burgeoning frustration among citizens, urging politicians to respond with harder-hitting approaches rather than preserving democratic principles. Ultimately, this tension presents a pivotal moment for democracy, challenging the ability of political actors to prioritize the future over immediate political gain.
The year is young, but Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die is going to be one of its most important books. It will be read as a commentary on Donald Trump, which is fair enough, because the book is, in part, a commentary on Donald Trump. But it deserves more than that. It is more than that. How Democracies Die is three books woven together. One summarizes acres of research on how democracies tumble into autocracy. The second is an analysis of the troubling conditions under which American democracy thrived and the reasons it has entered into decline. The third book is a fretful tour of Trump’s first year in office, and the ways in which his instincts and actions mirror those of would-be autocrats before him. Of these, the book about Donald Trump is the least interesting, and so in this interview, I didn’t focus on it. Instead, this is a discussion about how modern democracies fall, and the ways in which American democracy has been creeping towards crisis for decades now. Viewed this way, Trump is much more a symptom of our democratic decline than its cause. So let's talk about the cause. Books and Articles Mentioned The Oppermanns by Lion Feuchtwanger The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880-1910 by J. Morgan. Kousser The Path to Power (The Years of Lyndon Johnson, Volume 1) by Robert Caro Political Order in Changing Societies by Samuel P. Huntington (edited) Donald Matthews' book about the Senate in the 1950s Julia Azari's piece, Weak parties and strong partisanship are a bad combination: Rosenthal political polarization The webcomic Ezra mentioned, "Different" James Carse's book, Finite and Infinite Games