Brain Inspired BI 144 Emily M. Bender and Ev Fedorenko: Large Language Models
Language is a tool, not pinnacle
- Language may not be the pinnacle of cognition but a tool for communication.
- Complex thoughts can happen without language, challenging traditional views.
Language vs Inner Thought
- We often confuse language with inner thought because we talk to ourselves.
- Language is a medium for expressing thoughts but not the entirety of thinking.
Next-Word Prediction in Brain
- Brain regions dedicated to language show sensitivity to next-word predictability.
- Next-word prediction forms a core aspect of human language processing, not just a minor part.
Check out my short video series about what's missing in AI and Neuroscience.
Support the show to get full episodes, full archive, and join the Discord community.
Large language models, often now called "foundation models", are the model de jour in AI, based on the transformer architecture. In this episode, I bring together Evelina Fedorenko and Emily M. Bender to discuss how language models stack up to our own language processing and generation (models and brains both excel at next-word prediction), whether language evolved in humans for complex thoughts or for communication (communication, says Ev), whether language models grasp the meaning of the text they produce (Emily says no), and much more.
Evelina Fedorenko is a cognitive scientist who runs the EvLab at MIT. She studies the neural basis of language. Her lab has amassed a large amount of data suggesting language did not evolve to help us think complex thoughts, as Noam Chomsky has argued, but rather for efficient communication. She has also recently been comparing the activity in language models to activity in our brain's language network, finding commonality in the ability to predict upcoming words.
Emily M. Bender is a computational linguist at University of Washington. Recently she has been considering questions about whether language models understand the meaning of the language they produce (no), whether we should be scaling language models as is the current practice (not really), how linguistics can inform language models, and more.
- EvLab.
- Emily's website.
- Twitter: @ev_fedorenko; @emilymbender.
- Related papers
- Language and thought are not the same thing: Evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients. (Fedorenko)
- The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing. (Fedorenko)
- On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? (Bender)
- Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data (Bender)
0:00 - Intro 4:35 - Language and cognition 15:38 - Grasping for meaning 21:32 - Are large language models producing language? 23:09 - Next-word prediction in brains and models 32:09 - Interface between language and thought 35:18 - Studying language in nonhuman animals 41:54 - Do we understand language enough? 45:51 - What do language models need? 51:45 - Are LLMs teaching us about language? 54:56 - Is meaning necessary, and does it matter how we learn language? 1:00:04 - Is our biology important for language? 1:04:59 - Future outlook