Socrates and CaliCly's contrasting views highlight the clash between dedication to philosophy and the pursuit of truth versus focusing on public opinion as a politician and orator.
CaliCly's introduction of the idea that the 'law of nature' contradicts democratic laws echoes Friedrich Nietzsche's criticisms of democracy and emphasizes the importance of power and instincts for the strong.
Deep dives
The Clash Between Socrates and Nietzsche-Like CaliCly's
Socrates engages in a conversation with CaliCly's, a character in Plato's dialogues who shares philosophical views similar to Friedrich Nietzsche. Socrates cleverly jokes about their shared love interests and highlights CaliCly's tendency to shift opinions based on popular sentiment. This contrast is further explored by Socrates, who highlights his own relationship with Alcibiades, demonstrating that his nature is different from CaliCly's. Socrates emphasizes his dedication to philosophy and the pursuit of truth, contrasting CaliCly's focus on public opinion as a politician and orator. The clash between Socrates and Nietzsche's philosophical ideas becomes evident through their differing perspectives on what constitutes a meaningful life.
The Concept of the Law of Nature
During the discussion, CaliCly's introduces the idea that the true 'law of nature' contradicts democratic laws. He argues that the natural order is based on the instincts and power of the strong, challenging the notion of equality enforced by democracy. This perspective aligns closely with Friedrich Nietzsche's criticisms of democracy and his belief that true greatness stems from the powerful. CaliCly's reasoning echoes Nietzsche's belief that the weak majority establishes unnatural laws to restrain the superior individuals. In contrast, Socrates presents a different concept of the 'law of nature,' emphasizing the importance of a rightly ordered soul and the pursuit of wisdom to govern oneself and others.
Introspection on Socrates' Philosophy and Masculinity
CaliCly's criticizes Socrates' commitment to philosophy, belittling it as an unmanly and futile pursuit. He calls Socrates out for spending his time engaged in intellectual conversations instead of actively participating in public affairs. CaliCly's equates true manliness with pursuing power, wealth, and the pleasures of the world. Socrates, however, reflects on the nature of philosophy, acknowledging its value in his role as a midwife for ideas and his need for strong opponents to learn from. Socrates subtly challenges CaliCly's understanding of manliness by highlighting the contradictions in his arguments and urging him to reconsider what truly constitutes a meaningful and fulfilling life.
Please fill out this form to be put on the email list for future Maurin Academy seminars, short series and other events: https://pmaurin.org/newsletter/