Mike Hughes, one of the people behind the campaign, discusses a controversial ad challenging sexist behavior. The podcast explores the origins, divisiveness, and effectiveness of the 'mate' campaign. It also delves into the impact of social presence on behavior and how the campaign aims to equip men with tools to address misogyny.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The ad campaign aimed to change the contextual environment of misogynistic behavior by targeting bystanders and achieved a 300 million reach, incorporating into the UN school curriculum.
Using the word 'mate' as a byword for calling out misogynistic behavior provided men with a familiar yet different way to intervene and if widely adopted, it could be an effective tool to combat misogyny.
Deep dives
Phase One: Tackling Misogyny through Bystander Intervention
The ad campaign aimed to tackle violence against women and challenge sexist behavior by targeting the friends of perpetrators and encouraging them to step in. By focusing on the bystanders, the campaign aimed to change the contextual environment in which misogynistic behavior occurs. This approach was based on the Convit behavioral change model and aimed to address the fact that previous campaigns targeting perpetrators or women themselves had not been effective. The campaign achieved a 300 million reach and was shared by major organizations, including being incorporated into the UN school curriculum.
Phase Two: The Mate Campaign - Giving Men the Tools to Call Out Misogyny
The second phase of the campaign addressed the problem that men wanted to call out misogyny but didn't know how to in a way that wouldn't alienate themselves or their friends. The campaign aimed to target low-level misogyny that occurs in private spaces like WhatsApp groups and pubs. Through extensive research and ethnography, the team identified that men wanted to call out misogyny with respect and without shaming others. The solution was to use the word 'mate' as a byword for calling out misogynistic behavior, offering men a familiar yet different way to intervene.
The Power of Linguistic Relativity and the Future Success of the Campaign
The campaign used the principle of linguistic relativity to give calling out misogyny a name, 'mate'. By doing so, it aimed to make the behavior easier to adopt and justify. Linguistic relativity has been shown to be effective in marketing and influencing behavior. The campaign faced polarizing opinions, with some supporters praising its approach and others criticizing it. However, if the term 'mate' becomes widely understood and adopted, like other terms such as 'designated driver', it could provide a much-needed tool for men to call out misogyny.
This campaign was praised by Piers Morgan, yet lamented by Jordan Peterson.
It was championed by Caitlin Moran, yet condemned by the Guardian.
It’s a campaign that’s split opinion, not by typical ideological lines, but within the echo chamber.
Today, I spoke with Mike Hughes, one of the people behind the campaign, to figure out why it was so polarising, and whether or not the campaign was successful.