Ep. 307: Michael Sandel on Populism, Saving Democracy, and Tyranny of Merit

In 'A Theory of Justice,' John Rawls develops a moral theory of justice as fairness, which is an alternative to utilitarianism. The theory is based on the social contract approach and uses the concept of the original position and the veil of ignorance to derive two principles of justice. The first principle, the greatest equal liberty principle, ensures that each person has an equal right to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all. The second principle, which includes the difference principle and the equal opportunity principle, states that social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged and attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity. Rawls's theory aims to reconcile liberty and equality in a well-ordered society.

In 'The Tyranny of Merit', Michael J. Sandel argues that the current system of meritocracy has led to significant social and political issues. He contends that meritocracy stratifies society into winners and losers, based largely on economic status and educational credentials, resulting in hubris among the successful and resentment and humiliation among those who are not. Sandel suggests that this system ignores the role of luck and external factors in success and instead attributes success solely to individual talent and hard work. He advocates for a new way of thinking about success, one that is more attentive to the role of luck, more conducive to an ethic of humility and solidarity, and more affirming of the dignity of all work. The book also explores the impact of credentialism and the need to restore dignity to work that does not require a college degree, promoting a politics of the common good[1][3][5].

In 'Democracy's Discontent,' Michael Sandel examines the American political tradition and identifies a defect in the public philosophy that underlies contemporary American politics. He argues that the shift from a 'political economy of citizenship' to a 'political economy of growth' has eroded civic responsibilities and community, leading to widespread discontent. Sandel traces historical debates from the founding of the United States to contemporary issues, highlighting the tension between liberal and republican strands of American political thought. He advocates for a return to civic republicanism to address the sense of powerlessness and lack of social cohesion in modern America[2][4][5].