Cycle Syncing, Cardio Myths, and Iron Deficiency: A Barbell Medicine Review of Viral Claims
Episode Summary: Debunking Women's Health Claims and Setting Optimal Targets
In this in-depth episode, Dr. Jordan Feigenbaum, joined by Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple and Dr. Austin Baraki, breaks down the viral women's health claims made on a popular podcast, separating misleading mechanistic theory from actionable, evidence-based advice.
They tackle three major topics: the idea that Cycle Syncing is necessary for performance (spoiler: it's not); the confused messaging surrounding HIIT and Zone 2 cardio (consistency is key); and a critical discussion on Iron Deficiency, clarifying why standard lab cutoffs for ferritin are too low and why treating to an optimal target (greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL) is essential for managing fatigue and optimizing exercise performance in women.
⏱️ Episode Timestamps
- 1:29 I. Cycle Syncing: The Claim and the Mechanistic Logic
- 18:54 II. Conditioning Confusion: High Intensity, Zone 2, and Zone Definitions
- 21:10 Polarized vs. Pyramidal Training (Context)
- 47:08 III. Iron Deficiency: Normalizing Low Ferritin
- 51:52 Evidence Review: Setting Accurate Ferritin Cutoffs
⭐ Get More Value: Exclusive Content and Resources
Connect with Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple: @drlaurencs1
Want to support the show and get early, ad-free access to all episodes plus exclusive bonus content? Subscribe to Barbell Medicine Plus and get ad-free listening, product discounts, and more. Try it free for 30-days.
Unsure which training plan is right for you? Take the free Barbell Medicine Template Quiz to be matched with the ideal program for your goals and experience level.
For media, support, or general questions, please contact us at support@barbellmedicine.com
I. Cycle Syncing: Why Consistency Trumps Hormone Status
The Problem with Mechanistic Reductionism
The viral claim that women must systematically adjust their training volume and intensity based on fluctuating hormones (estrogen and progesterone) to optimize performance or avoid harm is based on a reductionist and largely unproven hypothesis. While hormone changes are real, relying solely on mechanistic data (what happens in isolated cells or textbook diagrams) is insufficient, as the complex, interactive nature of human physiology often overrides these single-factor effects.
Dr. Feigenbaum and Dr. Colenso-Semple clarify that no reliable human evidence supports the idea that cycle syncing leads to superior athletic performance or adaptation. The fundamental flaw in the advice is that it confuses a plausible mechanism with a meaningful outcome.
Harm Assessment: The Cost of Inconsistency
The primary harm in cycle syncing is that it leads to missed training opportunities. Adaptation is driven by consistent training load (mechanotransduction), not a temporary hormone profile. Planning to proactively reduce training intensity or volume based on an unproven hormone schedule is detrimental to long-term strength and endurance gains.
Training modifications should be reactive—if a person genuinely feels symptoms of fatigue, pain, or discomfort on a given day (regardless of their cycle status), they should adjust or skip the workout. The advice to only exercise or train hard when you "feel awesome" is inconsistent with the reality of progressive training and often sets unrealistic expectations.
II. Conditioning Confusion: Context is Everything
Debunking Zone 2 and HIIT Extremism
The hosts address the confusing and contradictory advice regarding high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and Zone 2 cardio, particularly the claim that Zone 2 is "bro science" and should be avoided.
The issue lies in a lack of context. The discussion on polarized (80/20) versus pyramidal training only becomes relevant for high-volume endurance athletes (those training for 10+ hours per week) where managing fatigue via intensity distribution is critical.
For the general population—the vast majority of people consuming the viral content—the goal is simple: consistency. Adhering to the minimum physical activity guidelines (150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week) is the priority. For this audience, almost any combination of volume and intensity works, as long as it is challenging enough and sustainable. The complex debate over intensity distribution is entirely non-actionable for people simply trying to start or maintain an exercise habit.
The advice was non-actionable because it:
- Used incorrect zone definitions ("Zone 1 is sitting around").
- Failed to integrate high-load resistance training into the cardio recommendation.
- Ignored the relationship between training frequency, volume, and total training load.
III. Iron Deficiency: Treating to Optimal Physiology
Normalizing Deficiency: The Problem with Lab Cutoffs
Dr. Baraki addresses the critical issue of Iron Deficiency, emphasizing that many standard laboratory cutoffs for ferritin are misleadingly low. Labs often set the lower limit of "normal" (e.g., 12–15 ng/mL) based on population averages, not optimal physiology. This is problematic because upwards of 50% of young women in these samples may have completely depleted iron stores (non-anemic iron deficiency) due to menstrual blood loss and insufficient dietary intake. By accepting these low limits, the medical system is effectively normalizing deficiency.
Optimal Ferritin Targets and Clinical Management
The consequences of non-anemic iron deficiency include significant symptoms like fatigue, impaired exercise performance, and restless leg syndrome. The body strips iron from other tissues, including muscle, to prioritize red blood cell production, masking the deficiency until it reaches the end stage of anemia.
Clinical guidelines are evolving, recognizing that higher ferritin levels are necessary for optimal health:
- General Target: A ferritin target of greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL is reasonable for most patients, especially those experiencing fatigue.
- Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS): A higher target of greater than or equal to 75 ng/mL may be necessary to address RLS, which is strongly linked to low iron stores in the brain.
- Treatment: Management often involves oral or IV iron supplementation to treat to this optimal target, while also investigating and treating the underlying causes of blood loss or malabsorption.
The idea that we are accepting lower levels due to a "sicker population" is a misconception; in reality, cutoffs are being increased (e.g., American Gastroenterology Association: 45 ng/mL; American Society of Hematology: 50 ng/mL) as clinicians learn more about optimal physiology and the necessity of managing non-anemic iron deficiency.
IV. Conclusion: Core Takeaways
The goal of reviewing this viral content is to provide a vital filter for the public, differentiating between a simple mechanism and an outcome that truly matters to long-term health and training.
- Consistency is King: For health, find a training program you can adhere to consistently. Do not let fear of cortisol or unproven hormone matching keep you from moving your body.
- Lift Weights: If your goal is to get stronger and improve bone mineral density, you must lift weights.
- Address Fatigue: Do not overlook iron deficiency; address fatigue by targeting optimal ferritin levels.
V. Citations
Our Sponsors:
* Check out Express VPN: https://expressvpn.com/BBM
* Check out FIGS and use my code FIGSRX for a great deal: https://wearfigs.com
* Check out Factor and use my code bbm50off for a great deal: https://www.factor75.com
* Check out Rosetta Stone and use my code TODAY for a great deal: https://www.rosettastone.com
* Check out Uncommon Goods: https://uncommongoods.com/bbm
* Check out Washington Red Raspberries: https://redrazz.org
Support this podcast at —
https://redcircle.com/barbell-medicine-podcast/donationsAdvertising Inquiries:
https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out:
https://redcircle.com/privacy
Barbell Medicine Podcast 