Summer picks: why are so many science papers being retracted?
Aug 22, 2024
auto_awesome
Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, and Sholto David, a vigilant blogger, dive into the alarming rise in retracted scientific papers, which reached 10,000 in 2023. They discuss a high-profile case of errors in research from a notable cancer institute and the implications for scientific integrity. The conversation highlights the role of platforms like Retraction Watch and PubPeer in promoting accountability. Together, they reveal how problematic incentives in publishing can compromise research quality, calling for urgent reforms in the academic landscape.
The record 10,000 research paper retractions in 2023 highlight a troubling crisis in scientific research integrity and reliability.
Individuals like Sholto David play a vital role in correcting scientific inaccuracies, but often encounter resistance from authors and journals.
Deep dives
The Rise of Research Retractions
In 2023, there has been a record number of over 10,000 research paper retractions, reflecting a growing crisis in the scientific community. Errors can stem from honest mistakes or more serious issues such as misconduct and fraudulent practices. A notable case highlighted the distressing mistakes found in papers from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, prompting immediate action for retraction and correction. This situation demonstrates that the integrity of scientific research is deteriorating, leading to concerns about the reliability of published studies.
The Role of Scientific Sleuths
Individuals like Sholto David are taking it upon themselves to identify and report errors in published scientific research, often through the platform PubPeer. His dedication to hunting down inaccuracies stems from a genuine interest in maintaining the quality of scientific literature, emphasizing that images and figures can sometimes be the only raw data presented in research papers. These sleuths play a crucial role in flagging potential issues, yet they often face resistance from authors and journals that may ignore or delay addressing reported problems. The efforts of these individuals are essential in attempting to restore trust in scientific findings.
The Impact of Publishing Incentives
The current structure of scientific publishing is heavily influenced by incentives that can lead to misconduct or fraudulent behavior among researchers. Many academics feel pressured to publish in high-ranking journals, which can tempt them to engage in unethical practices to achieve their goals. The proliferation of so-called paper mills that produce fake research highlights the vulnerabilities within the system, further complicating efforts to uphold research integrity. To address these issues, experts suggest that reforming the incentive structure is critical, ensuring that high-quality and trustworthy research practices are promoted and prioritized.
A record 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023. In this episode from February 2024, Ian Sample speaks to Ivan Oransky, whose organisation Retraction Watch has been monitoring the growing numbers of retractions for more than a decade, and hears from blogger Sholto David, who made headlines this year when he spotted mistakes in research from a leading US cancer institute. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/sciencepod
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode