Max Bazerman, a Harvard Business School professor, discusses the ethics of academia, spotlighting the systemic pressures that lead to misconduct. Brian Nosek from the University of Virginia talks about his efforts in promoting transparency through the Open Science Framework, revealing the reluctance in academia to share data. Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, exposes the challenges surrounding the integrity of publishing, especially after Hindawi's retraction of over 8,000 fraudulent papers. The episode sheds light on the pervasive issues of trust and accountability in research.

In a revealing conversation, Ivan Oransky, a doctor and co-founder of Retraction Watch, and Max Bazerman, a Harvard professor specializing in ethics, dissect the rampant issue of academic fraud. They discuss the overwhelming pressures within the $28 billion scholarly publishing industry that foster misconduct. The duo explores the challenges of accountability, the dangers of profit-driven practices in open-access publishing, and innovative solutions for enhancing transparency in research. Together, they uncover systemic issues that undermine trust in scientific integrity.

In a revealing conversation, Andrea Taylor, a biological anthropologist and former co-editor of the Journal of Human Evolution, joins Ivan Oransky, distinguished journalist and co-founder of Retraction Watch. They delve into the troubling wave of editor resignations in scientific publishing, driven by ethical dilemmas and financial pressures from publishers. The duo discusses the impact on editorial quality, the challenges of balancing quantity over quality in research papers, and what the future may hold for credibility in scientific literature.

Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, and Sholto David, a vigilant blogger, dive into the alarming rise in retracted scientific papers, which reached 10,000 in 2023. They discuss a high-profile case of errors in research from a notable cancer institute and the implications for scientific integrity. The conversation highlights the role of platforms like Retraction Watch and PubPeer in promoting accountability. Together, they reveal how problematic incentives in publishing can compromise research quality, calling for urgent reforms in the academic landscape.

Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch and a distinguished journalist at NYU, dives into how Trump’s executive orders are reshaping scientific research. He discusses the chilling effects on academic freedom, expressing concern over censorship and self-censorship among researchers. Oransky explores the historical context of government funding, tracing its impact on scientific priorities and independence. He warns of the growing influence of politics on inquiry and the potential consequences for the future of scientific discovery.