Episode 3: Confirmatio Praeiudicia

1

Introduction

00:00 • 3min

2

The Series of Numbers That Follows a Specific Rule

02:44 • 2min

3

The Modus Ponens and the Modus Tolerance

04:43 • 4min

4

Is There a Confirmation Bias in Science?

08:49 • 2min

5

Is There a Confirmation Bias in Science?

10:42 • 3min

6

Is There a Confirmation Bias in Psychology?

13:43 • 3min

7

The Question You Should Ask Before You Design Your Study

16:30 • 3min

8

The First Principle Is That You Must Now Fool Yourself

19:22 • 2min

9

Is the Risky Test the Only One You Need?

21:27 • 3min

10

Adversarial Collaboration

24:35 • 2min

11

Is There a Lot of Adversarial Collaborations?

26:06 • 2min

12

Are You Falling Prey to Confirmation Bias?

28:22 • 2min

13

Is There a Confirmation Bias?

30:23 • 3min

14

Is There a Difference Between Optimism and Science?

33:37 • 2min

15

Is There a Difference Between Null Results and Negative Results?

35:59 • 2min

16

Is There a Bias in Your Code?

38:05 • 2min

17

Is It Blinding Your Analyses?

39:52 • 2min

18

Is It a Good Tool to Do a Confirmatory Analysis?

41:56 • 2min

19

Preventing Confirmation Bias

43:59 • 2min

20

Is Bayesian Analysis a Bad Idea?

45:52 • 2min

21

Is Blinded Analysis a Good Idea?

47:43 • 5min

22

Is It Important to Be Anonymous?

52:34 • 4min

23

Is There a Confirmation Bias in Science?

56:26 • 2min

24

Is There a Need for Theoretical Psychologists?

58:29 • 3min