The concept of the imaginal mediates between the abstract and concrete worlds, distinct from the imaginary.
Engaging with archetypes and the symbolic self leads to aspirational self-transformation and dynamic self-organization.
Deep dives
Corbin's Distinction Between the Imaginary and the Imaginal
Corbin introduces the concept of the imaginal, emphasizing its mediation between the abstract intelligible world and the concrete sensible world. He distinguishes it from the imaginary, stating that the imaginal transjectively mediates between the subjective and the objective in an ongoing transformative process. The symbol is seen as capturing this dynamic interaction.
The Symbolic Self and Transformation Process
The discussion delves into the notion of the symbolic self or the sacred second self, representing the aspirational self that individuals aim to become. By internalizing symbolic entities and engaging with archetypes, individuals undergo a dynamic process of self-organization and development, aligning with Jung's concept of individuation.
Jung's Archetypes and Auto-Poetic Self-Organization
Jung's archetypes are depicted as formative patterns of the psyche, guiding its self-organization and development. The organic metaphor, contrasting Freud's hydraulic model, illustrates the psyche as an autopoetic system. Jung's emphasis on dialoguing with the sacred second self reveals a deep connection between archetypes and aspirational self-transformation.
Critiques and Integrations: Bridging Jung and Corbin
Criticism surfaces regarding Jung's subjective interpretation of archetypes as opposed to a transjective understanding advocated by Corbin. The discussion revolves around the existential modes neglected in Jung's focus on intrapsychic processes. Bridging the philosophies of Jung, Corbin, and Boober presents an opportunity for a comprehensive integration that enriches the understanding of psychology and mystical experiences.
