Damages

Geoffrey Supran, lead author of a peer-reviewed study on climate change, discusses Exxon's knowledge and role in climate denial. They explore the accuracy of Exxon's modeling and predictions, the decline in research funding for climate science, and the formation and effectiveness of influence campaigns on public opinion.

A new study reveals that Exxon scientists accurately predicted climate change crisis caused by fossil fuels. The evidence strengthens cases holding Exxon accountable. The podcast discusses the tactics and impact of the anti-climate science movement and explores climate denial as a propaganda campaign. It also delves into a large company's realization of climate change impact and its shift towards preserving traditional lines of business.

Guest Melinda Janki, a lawyer fighting against oil development in Guyana, discusses the rush of fossil fuel companies in the global south, their childhood memories in Guyana, drafting environmental legislation, legal cases and environmental issues in Guyana, and the potential consequences of Guyana's oil production on Caribbean economies and biodiversity.

Representative Ro Khanna discusses the House Oversight Committee's investigation into climate disinformation by oil companies, including topics such as greenwashing, bullying, university funding, bias in research, big oil's true intentions, accountability for misrepresentation, and the argument of free speech.

NASA scientist James Hansen and a cohort of researchers sue the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The podcast discusses the first-ever climate RICO filed on behalf of 16 Puerto Rican municipalities, the impact of IRA on decarbonization efforts, and frustration with the EPA's inaction on regulating greenhouse gases.

Preview of the Supreme Court's Fall session, including climate cases, SEC's disclosure rules, Clean Water challenges, and dismantling the administrative state. Implications of West Virginia v EPA decision, major questions doctrine, and the Inflation Reduction Act. Side deal effects on environmental laws and uncertainties. Jurisdiction battle over Mountain Valley pipeline and manipulating outcomes. Upcoming cases on the Clean Water Act, constitutional law, state regulation, and climate litigation.

This podcast explores the surge in anonymously funded amicus briefs, the power of Amicus briefs in swaying judges' opinions, the Supreme Court's disregard for ethics and transparency, and the implications of climate cases and political speech.

The podcast explores the differences between civil and common law systems, including the presence of juries. It discusses the concept of precedent in common law and the potential consequences of overturning it using examples like Roe v. Wade. The chapter also touches on the EPA's power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, the Citizens United case, and the role of the First Amendment in protecting corporate speech.

This episode of 'Damages' explores the lack of progress in achieving compensation for climate change damages caused by fossil fuels. It discusses the impacts of super typhoons and calls for assistance from rich countries. The history of rich countries reneging on their commitment to provide climate funds is explored, as well as the role of fossil fuel lobbyists in denying climate science. The podcast also delves into tactics employed at UN climate negotiations, the historical context of colonialism and fossil fuels, and the inadequate response to climate change.

Updates on the Juliana v United States youth climate case, including the government's responsibility and a new Netflix documentary. Changes to the complaint highlight the government's promotion of fossil fuel energy. Exploring the formation and influence of the Republican Attorneys General Association. Delays in the case and urgency to address climate change globally.