Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

The podcast discusses the personal stories of women in Texas who were denied abortions, highlighting the emotional and physical challenges they faced. It explores the ongoing litigation to challenge the Texas abortion ban and the impact of restrictive abortion laws on women's lives. The episode also features an interview with the lead plaintiff in a landmark abortion case and a discussion on the legal risks faced by physicians providing abortions in Texas.

This podcast explores a Supreme Court case that could weaken the government's ability to collect taxes from the wealthy. It discusses the background, motivations, and implications of the case. The episode also delves into the controversial relationship between Justice Alito and corporate lawyer David Rifkin, their fabrication of evidence, and potential perjury and fraud. Additionally, it analyzes the behavior of justices during oral arguments and their resistance to acknowledging the truth.

Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor's trailblazing career, judicial philosophy, and combination of humility and strength discussed by Dahlia Lithwick and RonNell Andersen Jones. Mark Joseph Stern returns to share big announcements and discuss SEC v Jarkesy, revealing the conservative justices' readiness to challenge the administrative state. Lower courts ignoring last term's voting rights decision in Allen v Milligan, raising questions about the protection of voting rights. Podcast celebrates Sandra Day O'Connor's influential legacy as the first female Supreme Court justice.

In this episode, the potential implications of Trump's second term are discussed. Trump's vindictive agenda involves appointing loyalists, cutting the FBI's budget, and using AI to screen for loyalists. The concerns about agency independence and Trump's language resembling that of tyrants are explored. The courts' role in serving Trump and the resistance against his actions are analyzed. Project 25 aims to dismantle safeguards, emphasizing the importance of voter participation.

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Amanda Hollis Brusky to explore the split between The Federalist Society and Donald J Trump. They discuss the potential consequences for the law and the Supreme Court. Amicus Plus segment covers the Supreme Court's new ethics code.

The podcast explores the potential impact of Donald Trump's legal woes and political trials. It discusses the historical significance of political trials, the challenges of determining appropriate venues for these trials, and the decentralized nature of the US legal system. The chapter also delves into the focus on the historical right to bear arms in a Supreme Court case and introduces the case of Zaki Rahimi, highlighting the controversial implications of his eligibility to possess a firearm.

Gun safety advocate Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, discusses the potential consequences of pursuing originalism in gun rights cases, the connection between domestic violence and guns, and the need for evolving gun laws. The podcast also explores the influence of court decisions on gun regulations, the impact of exposing gun lobbying groups, and the correlation between strengthening gun laws and reduced gun violence.

A discussion on ongoing legal trials involving Donald Trump, including fraud prosecution, defamation trial, vote subversion allegations, Stormy Daniels' hush money payments, and collection of classified documents. An analysis of the Eileen Cannon case, its potential consequences, and judge's temporary suspension of discovery issues. Challenges of navigating overwhelming news, implications of incendiary posts, and analyzing Trump's defense strategy. Concern over MAGA ideology and constitutional lawyering.

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Ian Bassin of Protect Democracy to discuss the stakes of this moment for American democracy. They explore Protect Democracy's work in protecting election workers, addressing disinformation through lawsuits, and the dangers of authoritarianism. They highlight the need for regulations on new forms of communication and emphasize the importance of individuals in strengthening democracy.

The podcast discusses a Supreme Court case involving a racial gerrymander disguised as a political one. It explores the impact of gerrymandering on the Gullah people and their cultural preservation. The speakers express frustration with ongoing voting rights issues and the difficulty of proving circumstantial evidence. They analyze the evidence and lower court decisions in racial gerrymandering cases and emphasize the importance of addressing racial issues and protecting voting rights.