The podcast discusses recent rulings that disqualified Donald Trump from the Republican primary ballot in Colorado and explores the legal debate surrounding his inclusion. It analyzes dissenting arguments in a Supreme Court ruling on insurrection and discusses ongoing cases, including the events of January 6th and the question of presidential immunity. The chapter also emphasizes the importance of holding Trump accountable and the role of the rule of law in achieving justice.
45:08
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Donald J. Trump should not appear on the ballot in the state's Republican primary, addressing questions regarding insurrection and his involvement.
The ongoing lawsuits involving Trump, including those related to obstruction and vote certification, have the potential to hold him accountable and impact his future political endeavors.
Deep dives
Season 4 of Mobituaries podcast
The podcast host announces season 4 of Mobituaries, promising fascinating stories about notable individuals and things that have passed away. The upcoming episodes will cover a range of topics, including famous figures who died on the same day and things the host wishes would no longer be around, like buffets.
Convergence of conservative Supreme Court and Trump
The episode discusses the convergence of two worlds: the conservative Supreme Court and Donald Trump. The court has already involved itself in cases related to presidential immunity and obstruction of vote certification. The Colorado Supreme Court's recent ruling that Trump can be kept off the primary ballot is seen as significant, as it addresses questions regarding insurrection and whether the former president participated in it.
Challenges in determining presidential immunity
The podcast delves into the issue of presidential immunity and its relevance in ongoing cases involving Donald Trump. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is examined to understand if insurrection includes the president and what constitutes an office of the United States. The technical and legalistic questions surrounding these issues are highlighted, as they contribute to the complex nature of the discussions.
Importance of key Trump-related lawsuits
The episode emphasizes the significance of various lawsuits related to Trump and his alleged co-conspirators. These lawsuits, including those focusing on January 6th, obstruction, and potential gauntlets, hold the potential to hold Trump accountable and impact his future political endeavors. The discussion touches upon the challenges of navigating the legal system and the relevance of public perception in determining the outcome.
This week, the Colorado Supreme Court determined in a pivotal decision that Donald J Trump should not appear on the ballot in the state's Republican primary. Meanwhile the high court is already involved in the possible briefing of another Trump case (about presidential immunity) and has agreed to docket another involving the obstruction of the vote certification on Jan 6 2021. And we haven’t even mentioned the Georgia case. Basically, Trump is going to have a very lawyer-y 2024. So where do all these cases sit right now? Slate’s Jeremy Stahl joins Amicus host Dahlia Lithwick to give us an update.
In this week’s Amicus Plus segment, Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern joins the show to talk about Rudy Giuliani’s defamation lawsuit and the $150 million he owes election workers. Mark and Dahlia also discuss the latest in ProPublica’s continued deep dive into the finances of Clarence Thomas.