The Thomistic Institute

The Thomistic Institute
undefined
Jan 23, 2026 • 46min

John Paul II on the Value of Human Life and Euthanasia – Prof. Christopher Tollefsen

In this discussion, Christopher Tollefsen, a Professor of Philosophy known for his work in ethics and bioethics, dives into the intricate issues surrounding euthanasia and the value of human life. Tollefsen highlights John Paul II’s teachings on the sanctity of life, asserting that any direct voluntary killing of the innocent is gravely immoral. He also critiques the common assumptions equating treatment refusal with assisted death and discusses the ethical implications of public policy regarding abortion versus physician-assisted suicide.
undefined
4 snips
Jan 22, 2026 • 46min

St. Thomas Aquinas on the Beatitudes – Fr. Anton ten Klooster

Fr. Anton ten Klooster, an assistant professor of theology at Tilburg University and expert on Aquinas, delves into the Beatitudes' significance. He explores how Aquinas defined true happiness, linking contemplation to fulfillment. The discussion highlights the Beatitudes as both actions and divine promises, revealing their structure and purpose. Fr. Anton also emphasizes the role of saints as exemplars and the pastoral aim of encouraging imitation for spiritual growth. His insights bridge medieval thought and contemporary moral theology.
undefined
Jan 21, 2026 • 46min

Engaging Politics as a Catholic – Dr. Jan Bentz

Fr. Jan Bentz, a Catholic philosopher and lecturer specializing in Thomism, dives into the intricate relationship between faith and politics. He critiques the current political landscape, emphasizing the perils of utopianism and political cynicism. Bentz outlines five guiding principles for Catholic engagement, advocates for critical thinking, and calls for a both-and approach to political issues. He discusses the role of truth in politics, AI's regulation, and the importance of sanctifying the public sphere with transcendent values.
undefined
Jan 20, 2026 • 49min

Understanding Anscombe’s Absolutism – Prof. Marshall Bierson

Prof. Marshall Bierson, an ethics expert at the Catholic University of America, explores Elizabeth Anscombe’s moral absolutism. He argues that philosophical questions can often be grammatically confused, which obscures the nature of moral absolutes. Bierson highlights the tension between consequentialism and absolutism, using examples like the Trolley Problem and chess rules to illustrate his points. He emphasizes Anscombe’s distinction between reasons and logoi, revealing how moral language shapes our understanding of constraints and justifications.
undefined
Jan 19, 2026 • 49min

Icons and Idols: An Augustinian Reflection on Race, Racism, and Antiracism – Prof. Kevin Kambo

In this enlightening discussion, Kevin M. Kambo, an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Dallas, delves into race through an Augustinian lens. He suggests that modern racial categories are idolatrous myths rooted in the desire for dominance. Kambo critiques the political dynamics of race, likening it to a noble lie from Plato, and challenges common labels within Catholic discourse. He emphasizes the need for mercy over dominance, advocating for a view that recognizes each person as an icon of God.
undefined
Jan 16, 2026 • 51min

Augustine and Aquinas Against Skepticism – Prof. Chad Pecknold

Chad C. Pecknold, a renowned Catholic theologian and professor, explores skepticism's roots and its impact on morality. He argues that modern skepticism stems from a loss of connection to God, an insight traced back to Augustine and Aquinas. Pecknold explains how metaphysical realism affirms the mind's capacity to know truth. Delving into historical philosophical shifts, he illustrates how nominalism has led to contemporary views of constructed reality, all while emphasizing that genuine morality is essential for understanding Christ as Truth.
undefined
Jan 15, 2026 • 49min

The Issue of Free Will: Are We the Authors of Our Actions? – Prof. Steven Jensen

Prof. Steven Jensen, a leading scholar in Thomistic philosophy and bioethics, delves into free will and moral responsibility. He argues that true authorship of our actions relies on self-determination rather than deterministic forces. Jensen critiques compatibilism and emphasizes libertarian agency, discussing our capacity for alternative choices. He explores Aquinas's view of the will as a rational appetite, distinguishing between emotional influences and rational decision-making. Through engaging examples, Jensen presents a compelling defense of human freedom.
undefined
Jan 14, 2026 • 1h 3min

Rewiring the Brain – Dr. William Hurlbut

Dr. William Hurlbut, a physician and adjunct professor at Stanford, dives into the fascinating realm of neuroplasticity and neurotechnology. He explores how education and lifestyle can reshape the brain while cautioning about the risks of our digital culture and addictive behaviors. Dr. Hurlbut discusses the ethical implications of biotechnology in enhancing human capabilities, warning against the potential dangers of transhumanist goals. He emphasizes the need for a public dialogue that incorporates science, philosophy, and ethics to navigate the future of brain intervention.
undefined
Jan 13, 2026 • 53min

If ChatGPT Exists, Why Study? – Fr. Chris Gault, O.P.

Fr. Chris Gault, a Dominican priest and former doctor, delves into the implications of AI on the study process. He argues that while AI can process information, it lacks the ability to foster true understanding and virtues. Drawing on Plato, he warns that reliance on technology may diminish our intellectual depth. Gault emphasizes the unique, immaterial nature of human intellect and encourages a disciplined approach to learning, advocating for study as a pathway to wonder and fulfillment. He suggests using AI as a tool, not a substitute for genuine scholarly engagement.
undefined
9 snips
Jan 12, 2026 • 57min

Can a Machine Understand?: ChatGPT, Knowledge, and the Nature of Understanding – Prof. Tomás Bogardus

In this insightful discussion, philosopher Tomás Bogardus explores whether machines can truly understand. With a background in metaphysics and epistemology, he delves into the distinctions between types of knowledge and the implications of large language models (LLMs) in our understanding of truth and belief. He argues that LLMs, while capable of producing language, lack genuine understanding and consciousness. Bogardus warns about the risks of over-reliance on technology potentially degrading human thinking skills while acknowledging LLMs' value when truth-focused.

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app