

MGTOW Sandman Quotes
Mgtow
All the wisdom of the MGTOW thanks to Sandman (https://www.youtube.com/user/SandmanMGTOW)
Episodes
Mentioned books

Jun 30, 2021 • 11min
100 - Cafe Equality Day
This video is mainly to do with my thoughts about CAFE, better known as The Canadian Association For Equality and how they fit into the equal rights movement as well as the men's rights movement. I was out volunteering and shot a video for them this past weekend and had some time to get to know the volunteers instead of just filming a talk by the lecturers they usually have at their events. And I want to share my experience about what I saw and more importantly how I felt about the experience. I'm going to show the video here but if you haven't already I urge everyone to go over to the video on CAFE's youtube page and subscribe to their channel. I'm including a link to the video on their page in the description below. A few days ago I heard Paul Elam at a voice for men says that CAFE needs to recognize the dirty tricks that feminism uses and stand up them instead of being as relaxed about it as they seem to be. I think CAFE is taking the opposite point of view. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think CAFE is doing a great job specifically because their volunteers are more relaxed and easy going and positive. People in general respond better to a positive message then a negative one. If you're in someones face looking angry and mean people will subconsciously think and feel that you're message must also be negative. But if you put on a smile and positive message then more people will listen to you and take your message seriously. It's also hard for people to take you seriously when you're using foul language to get your message across. Or if you're using a negative tone of voice you're not going to have people listen to either MGTOW, MRA or in the case of CAFE (ERA or Equal Rights Associations) because that's the way that I see CAFE. It's not about aiming to push rights for one sex or gender over the other and I think if more groups show up like that then we can reduce the number of radical feminists in society and also reduce the number of misogynists in society. And I believe that we are moving into a future where men and women are going to have to work as partners once more for the simple act of survival. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Just because I choose to go my own way and avoid relationships doesn't mean that most guys in society will embrace the MGTOW movement or consume and digest red pill knowledge. Most men and women will continue to wear their blinders when it comes to relationships and marriage and there is simply no way of changing that. And I don't want to re-iterate that male female relations should go back to some form of traditionalism. We are in uncharted waters. In the history of humanity men and women have never experienced the relative peace stability and freedom that we are enjoying today. And just because we have it today doesn't necessarily mean we will have it tomorrow. CAFE Volunteers Tell You Why They Support Equality Day!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHJIR...Sandman (MGTOW) Appreciation Videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rKDC...Canadian Association for Equalityhttp://equalitycanada.com/Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 27, 2021 • 11min
99 - MGTOW Dating
The question of dating and Men Going Their Own Way has made me ponder whether or not MGTOW men should be dating and what it means for them. Some of you guys out there like the Mayor or MGTOW continue to date and have girlfriends even though they are MGTOWs. Anyways, now I want to get on with the topic of MGTOW dating. Before it was rebuilt there was a section on MGTOW Dot com that explains the different levels of Men Going Their Own Way. The first level of MGTOW is called situational awareness. This level includes men who are aware of the realities that face them in society, and yet deem the risks acceptable to have a go at playing the game. I would consider level one MGTOWs as purple pill kind of guys. They know the risks and dangers of paternity fraud, hyper-gamy, high divorce rates, unfair alimony and these level one guys still say ok the risk is acceptable for them to go forth and multiply. They are comfortable enough going out and dating and looking for a relationship. They have the knowledge about female and male biology and interpersonal relations but their biological drive and imperative is still driving them towards relationships and the red pill alarm bells are going off in their heads but they are still pushing towards long term relationships and marriage. Level one men going their own way are purple pill kind of guys. They haven't given up on dating and women and are possibly out there looking for a woman that's that special one in a million that will make them happy. I would classify Paul Elam over at a voice for men as a level one MGTOW or purple pill kind of guy because he has been in a relationship for about a decade now but I believe he doesn't want to move in with her and get married. Please correct me if I'm wrong but that's the way I see it.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 25, 2021 • 10min
98 - Gods Among MGTOW - Wright Brothers
Next time you go up into an airplane and leave the safety of the ground behind remember that it was two lifelong bachelors that developed the earliest technology to allow you to do that. Orville and Wilbur Wright remained permanent bachelors for their entire lives. If they were married the odds would be stacked against them with regards to the amount of time they had to devote to the development of early aviation. How many of us believe that if the Wright Brothers had wives and kids they would risk their lives every time they went up into the air in first flimsy airplanes. They were flying around wearing a suit and tie and didn't even have seat belts in many cases. And in 1908 they went through the first fatal airplane crash where Orville Wright was severely injured and his passenger Thomas Selfridge was killed. This was in front of a crowd of two thousand people. How many of you think that if Orville had a wife and kids and she saw this happen he would never again be allowed to fly again? Thinking about the Wright Brothers kind of reminds me of old videos I watched from the 1950s and 1960s. Those videos were of astronaut wives viewing and visiting the launch pads during their husbands launch into space. And I believe that Nasa and the United States government didn't invite the women to view their husbands blast off into outer space for the wife's sake. I believe they did it to keep the astronauts from chickening out because his wife would apply too much pressure on their husbands. It was a way to pass on some of the husbands honor and attention onto her so that she would leave him alone and not stress him out as much as she would have. You will notice that in early space travel the astronauts wife and other family members always seemed to be front and center in the news footage and government broadcasts. The family element was seemingly just as important as the first step on the moon or the first spacewalk. Many of the Apollo astronaut wives had missionradios from Nasa directly installed in their homes and in many cases in their bedrooms so they could monitor every detail of their husband's missions. Astronauts were under intense pressure to accomplish their missions correctly and the last thing they needed was stress from their wife to distract them. But let me get back to the Wright Brothers.Dollar crisis and oil shortage aren't the end of the worldhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7Ty3...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 23, 2021 • 10min
97- Controlling Your Emotions
So anyways, here's the question: "Hello Sandman, I am glad that I found your channel and absorbing the MGTOW perspective. Thank you for what you are doing and keep up the good work. In my dating past, I realized that I get attached to a women too quickly which would set the tone of being a SIMP and doing male tricks. A male trick in this case, is a man who spends money in order to gain acceptance by a female. A SIMP is a man that puts himself in a subservient/submissive position under women in hopes of winning them over, while the female brings little to nothing to the table. I have found myself "tricking" and "simping" a bit in the past and luckily it's never put me in the bad and worse case scenario. I have matured and do this type of behavior anymore thank goodness... but I still have the nagging problem that when I get attached to a girl, I begin to envision that "nothing will go wrong" and "happily ever after" relationship. You know, the Disney bullshit. I have realized that when you allow your emotions to control you early in a relationship, it begins to cloud your judgment later on... where there would be a fight between logic and feelings when something suspicious comes up. Also, you are setting up yourself to be taken advantaged off. Recently, I was dealing with a woman that was secretive and "too busy" for me after some time dealing with each other. Although I had no evidence at the time, from intuition I suspected that there was another guy, and eventually I dropped her. It turned out that there was another guy, and luckily I did the right thing. The problem is that I took too long in doing so because feelings were in the way. Because I took too long, i spent too much time, effort and energy on the negative where I could have saved that and use it for something more positive and productive. My question is, how can a man control his emotions?The Purple Pill Of Purgatoryhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p71B1...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 20, 2021 • 12min
96 - Nawalts
I really have to thank everyone for their support after doing my video yesterday. This video is dedicated to Joseph. I'll use his donation to go to the Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium on June the 6th and 7th. And I'm adding a link to that event in the description below. I'm excited because I get a chance to meet Stephan Molyneux as well as get to hear Miles Groth and Erin Pizzey as well as many other speakers over those two days. Just follow the link and tickets for the full two days is $40 dollars. Hopefully I'll see you there. Anyways, now on to my topic Nawalts or Not All Women Are Like That. I know many of you won't agree with this video and that's fine by me. I just want to open the dialogue and figure out what many of the women that have nawalt qualities might have in common. I received the following email from Jill about a week ago and I want to read it everyone. Anyways here goes: "Hi Sandman, I wanted to first thank you very much for your videos. I enjoy listening to them everyday as I sip my morning coffee. I got hooked by one of your videos and I became a red pill fiend after that. A little background about me is I am 25 year old girl living in the Northwest United States. I currently live at home again with my father who was divorced, robbed, and thrown out in the garbage by my feminist mother about 11 years ago. I went to live with my dad after my mom in turn grew tired of me, robbed me, and threw me out at the age of 17 (of course just a few months shy of my 18th birthday signaling the discontinuation of her child support checks). So after that experience my father and I thankfully became close and I got the father I had always needed but was never allowed. I can firmly attest to how much children truly need their fathers more than their mothers. I say this hoping to become a mother someday. Anyway, that is a little bit of where I am coming from in case you were wondering why a young female listens to your videos. I had a question I thought you could answer. I was wondering if you see a scenario or know of one where men turn to MGTOW or become more interested in MRA at the very least without having their backs broken by the system/women first? It seems like every man who comes to this conclusion must first pay a very heavy price for it. And I'm sorry I know it probably seems odd that I would feel compelled to contact you as I am a woman. I understand that, but your videos have helped me tremendously so thank you for your work and the time you took to read this. Well, thanks for your question Jill. I don't know you personally Jill and I don't know the types of romantic relationships in your life but I do know other women in my life that have gone through similar experiences where they didn't received a negative upbringing from their fathers and a positive upbringing from their mothers. But from everything you say you understand MGTOW and I can assume that you understand the dark side of female nature and the good side of male nature so you are probably in the not all women are like that category.Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium. June 6/7http://torontodv.com/Sandman 2https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumK...costume:http://www.ebay.com/itm/Uncle-Sam-Eli...http://www.ebay.com/itm/UNCLE-SAM-PAT...mask:http://www.aliexpress.com/item/SF-12-...http://www.aliexpress.com/item/SH-9-T...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 18, 2021 • 10min
95 - MGTOW's Annonymous
In this video I want to let everyone know that there is good chance that my identity is about to be exposed and people in the public might become aware that I'm part of the MGTOW movement. I understood that it could happen at some point but it was still a surprise to me because I had many different taken precautions to keep my identity private. I won't get into any details about what's happening at this time. But I can explain the reasons why I believe this is happening. And of all the reasons I think it has to do with a story I did about Elliot Rodger a few days ago. Apparently the fact that I say that Elliot Rodger is a Feminist in the title of that video which I'm including in the description below might have pissed someone off. The reason I used that title as I outlined in the video was to draw attention to the power of false headlines. Feminists called Elliot Rodger an MRA without any connection to Men's rights and claimed that he went on rampage because of it. Myself as well as many other people called them out on this and apparently they didn't like this. So now they are contacting people about it. One person that I personally. So let me re-iterate what I have already said in my last video. Elliot Rodger is not a Feminist or an MRA and I wanted to bring attention to the fact that headlines are sometimes more powerful then the stories that are beneath them. And a couple of days ago I was saying that you're not over the target unless you take flak. Well it looks like the flak just hit the side of my plane and took a big chunk out of it. So I guess I'm kind of shaken up at this point and having a hard time keeping it together. I'm pretty sure that some feminist out there saw the headline and thought to herself how do we make trouble for Sandman. And at this point if my identity comes out fully into the open then I will have no choice but to accept that and continue making videos. I believe in Men Going Our Own Way enough to put myself on the line. When I was in University one of my professors said that if you're going to getting into trouble then do it for something you believe something that you can stand behind and something worth dying for. In some way MGTOWs are not only fighting for our own individual rights and freedoms but also for the future fate of civilization. The consumer culture we live in is destroying the world and burning up our fossil fuel inheritance which will be mostly gone or too expensive to dig up in thirty to forty years. And for what make-up, McMansions and Caribbean vacations. What's also also kind of ironic that the first person I contacted to help me in this situation was a woman and I called her to ask for her advice. This is one of the few women I would consider a Nawalt because she has been one of the few women I've met that was able to give without expecting something back in return. And I feel that I've done the same with her. And of course my male friends are also listening to me at this time. I won't say anything else about about what happened.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 16, 2021 • 10min
94 - MGTOW Freedom
I'd like to dedicated this video to Jacob. He sent me a donation and I want to thank him for his support. Anyways the topic for this video is a response to Stardusk's video which I'm adding in the description. I don't want to cut him up or attack him. Instead I want to thank him for bringing up the subject of marketing freedom and marketing mgtow. What I want to do is make the case or argument in favor of marketing freedom for mgtow. The very line "marketing freedom" got me thinking about the creation of the United States. Everyone knows that Stardusk and myself have had our disagreements in the past but if you know you're American history then you know that in the early formation of the United States there were many misunderstandings and divisions between the founding fathers. Stardusk himself mentions that men by their very nature dissent against each other. And it is through conflict that we men resolve our differences and move forward. But I believe that Stardusk sees the great value in marketing even if he says he doesn't. The United States were formed on the back of a marketing campaign. The taxes that the British were putting on the American Colonies for Tea were insignificant if we compare them to the tax rates people pay today. The story about the Boston Tea party was told throughout the colonies to rally support for independence. When the founding fathers decided to go their own way they also decided to write the declaration of independence. It was a document of self ownership but they spread it throughout the colonies so that people would hear those three magical words, we the people. In addition to that declaration early Americans created other symbols they could get behind as well as use to promote their fledgling rebellion. The constitution and architecture in Washington DC are such symbols. Men are visual beings and we respond to what we see around us. If marketing wasn't important then why does Stardusk the thinking-ape put so much effort into presenting his viewers with fancy 3D animated graphics at the beginning of his videos? Why does The thinking ape select images of apes to peak our interest and curiosity. The phrase: "The only way to win the game is to not play" that too is marketing. Everything is marketing. The way we speak, the way present our youtube channels to our viewers. All of this is marketing. Yesterday I showed people pictures of Washington DC and just to make it clear to everyone I'm not American but I understand that some extent America exists today because of marketing. We also have the Gadsden flag with Snake that says "Don't Tread On Me." This too was a form of promotion.Why MGTOW is the Way Forward...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCojV...Cancel the Men's Rights Conferencehttp://www.change.org/petitions/doubl...Google's new driverless car has no brakes or steering wheelhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mo...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 13, 2021 • 10min
93 - Men's Rights & Terrorism
A couple of days ago I spoke about Elliot Rodger and I casually mentioned that feminists were going to take the story and the anti-feminist shooting in Montreal in 1989 and use that material to attack the men's rights movement and MGTOW. Well a couple of hours after I posted that video a few people sent me messages saying that feminists have already taken this information and created a petition on the White House Websites. This petition which I'm linking to in the description below is called: "Classify the Men's Rights Movement as a terrorist group." And this is what the petition has to say: "The Men's Rights Movement (MRM) is a misogynistic movement that advocates violence against women and girls. Multiple members of the MRM--self identified Men's Rights Activists (MRAs)--have committed atrocities and mass murders. Marc Lepine killed 17 women on a university campus in the "Montreal Massacre". Tom Ball firebombed a courthouse and wrote a manifesto encouraging others to bomb government buildings that is posted on major MRM websites like avoiceformen.com. Elliot Rodger, an active MRA, shot and killed at least 7 young women and injured many other people at random. Rodger is being celebrated as a martyr and hero by the movement, which will likely cause other MRAs to emulate his crimes. This is what the MRM does and action must be taken against them to protect women and girls." This statement is factually wrong in so many ways. First of all Marc Lepine killed fourteen women and not 17. And Elliot Rodger did not shoot and kill seven women. He killed two women and four men. And this idea that Elliot Rodger is being celebrated as a martyr and a hero by the men's rights movement is insane. Who in the men's rights movement is glorifying him? This entire thing is an attack on the men's rights movement and A voice For Men. The fact that this factually wrong petition hasn't been taken down by the white house is an insult. As of right now the petition has twenty three hundred signatures. Yesterday when I discovered this petition around eleven pm eastern standard time and the number of signatures was fifteen hundred. So right now if it continues at its current rate this petition will get forty to fifty thousand signatures in the one month that is has to reach the magical number of one hundred thousand. If the petition reaches that number then it will be handed over by the white house to policy makers to analyze and respond to. Classify the Men's Rights Movement as a terrorist grouphttps://petitions.whitehouse.gov/peti...Please sign this White House petition to declare A Voice for Men a terrorist grouphttp://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 11, 2021 • 11min
92 - A God Among MGTOW - Esther Vilar
Someone suggested that I cover Esther Vilar the author of the Manipulated Man and do a video on her for my god among mgtow series. I look at this as part one of two part series. The second part will be a book review of her seminal work. But in this part I'm going to talk about her personal life, struggles with her famous book that many of us MGTOWs have already read, called the manipulated man. Why did she choose to write this book? Why did she try to reveal to men the controlling nature of women? Her book The Manipulated Man was so popular when it was released in the nineteen seventies that she was invited to go on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. Her book also came out at a time when feminism was rising in Western nations and she was part of the small minority of people standing up to it at that time. She argues that contrary to what is socially acceptable and says that women oppress and exploit men for their own benefits and instead tried to paint women as accountable. She was saying this at a time when women were trying to blame men instead of taking responsibility for their views. Anyways, getting back on topic Esther was a doctor in Bavaria, Germany and she studied psychology and sociology. So she had the credentials to talk about male female relations because she spent her days interacting with men and women in a professional medical practice trying to analyze their behavior. The main theme or thesis that permeates all of her work male female relations is the idea that in advanced industrial economies women are not victims but instead manipulate men for their own ends. For some reason Esther is also considered by many people fascist because of her work. The irony is that Fascism is also known as national socialism. So fascism more closely resembles communism then people believe. One of the main reasons people think that she is a fascist is because she wrote the play Speer about the famous German architect under Hitler, Albert Speer. But her background is German-Jewish so I highly doubt that she would be support the Nazis. Simply because she is against feminism does not automatically make her a fascist. And by many accounts Albert Speer, was sucked up into the Third Reich like many other people because he was afraid of upsetting Hitler and if he did that then there was a chance Hitler would kill him or his family. And Albert Speer went to prison after the war. A war crimes tribunal found him guilty and sentenced him. Justice was done.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Jun 9, 2021 • 12min
91 - Elliot Rodger is a Feminist
In case you missed it Elliot Rodger a 22 year old man from Santa Barbara decided to go on a killing rampage because not a single woman has given him attention in his entire life. The victims of the Elliot Rodger shooting include 4 men and 2 women. First he killed his three male roommates and then he went to a sorority house where he was planning on going inside and killing all of the women. Luckily when he knocked on the door they didn't let him in so he killed Katherine Cooper, Veronika Weiss and Christopher Martinez, all young people in their late teens and early twenties. Then he went off and randomly shot and wounded people on the street until his car crashed and the police found him dead inside from a self inflicted gunshot wound. And one more thing, Elliot Rodger was a feminist. You heard me I said the word "feminist." Do I need to prove to you he was a feminist? Of course not. All I have to say is that he was a feminist and people will believe me right? Feminists are claiming that Mr. Rodger was an MRA. Did they have to prove it? Of course not. As soon as this story broke Feminists started saying that Elliot Rodger was an MRA. And they claim that Elliot is an MRA because he was a member of the website PUAHate.com. But Elliot Rodger was not a PUA he was against pickup artists. And since pickup artists have often been associated with MRA's and MGTOWS does that mean he was against them as well? The PUAHate.com website is a place that describes itself as the 'Anti-Pickup-Artist Movement' because it believes that many so called dating gurus and seduction artists are scammers. And that all they care about is making money. But that doesn't seem to matter to the mainstream media and feminists. They want to take this story and twist the facts to target the Men's Rights Movement. This is telling me that the Men's Rights Movement is now on the feminists radar as a threat. First they ignored the men's rights movement. Then they started to ridicule it like in the video from Saturday Night Live. I'm including a link to that sketch so you can watch it and let me know. And now they are attacking Men's Rights head on and trying to say that it's directly related to mass murder. They are stretching the connection between PUA and MRA in a rediculous way and they are completely ignoring the fact that Rodger was against the PUA movement. That's like saying if someone joined a website that was against sexual abuse simply because that particular website had the word abuse in the title that would mean that person would be for abuse. By that same logic if I joined a website called ViolenceAgainstWomen.com then I would be in favor of being violent to women because the word violence is found in the title. Feminists are trying to paint MRA, PUA, MGTOW and any other term that means equality and fair treatment for men and trying to tarnish it by saying that the very use of such words is evil. Most people in society don't understand the meaning of terms like MRA or MGTOw. And many of us know that feminists are incapable of winning a rational argument so they are using guilt by word association here. They are not attacking men's rights directly but they are trying to define it as evil before society in large can understand what it means? They are scared and their behavior proves it.Elliot Rodger - Facebook Pagehttps://www.facebook.com/elliot.rodge...SNL Skit Savagely Attacks Pro-Life Activism and Conservativeshttp://madworldnews.com/watch-snl-ski...My Twisted World - The Story of Elliothttp://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/24...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy


