MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Stefan Molyneux at the Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium. Event hosted by Attila Vinczer. Event put on by The Canadian Maltese Charitable Services Trust.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is what Kelvin has to say: "Hello Sandman, I am a big fan of your videos and I was wondering if it possible that you could please do a video about male alienation that briefly talked about in your "MGTOWs Anonymous" video? When in high school I was the typical shy, introverted kid that kept my head down with zero success with women. After high school I vowed to improve myself however that has caused me to alienate most of male friends in my life which has caused me to be by myself for the last couple of years. The bitter reality I soon realized with my past male friendships was that most of my "friends" kept me around not because they enjoyed my company but because I was seen as a resource to them or they had access to someone they could make put down to make themselves feel better. I have also found that because of non-competitive nature and that I often just "walk away" from things men my age get very upset because I refused to get involved in their bullshit and their emotions. I find nowadays the only males I can really connect to are men who have gained empathy from being harmed in the past or older men. If you could provide some insight on this male alienation it would really make my day. Thanks, Kelvin. Well, thanks for your very interesting observations and experiences Kelvin. I'm going to elaborate with many personal stories during my childhood.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I've been watching the drama over the last few days with regards to the Manhood Academy. Their leader known either as aca demy or "the professor" modifies his voice to sound like a Chipmunk. So I'm gonna start calling him Professor Chip 'n' Dale. That's also the reason why the title of this video is called The Chipmunk Academy. Professor Chip 'n' Dale recently held an online a debate with Psychological Cynic. And today he released a second debate between himself and Josh. And Chip 'n' Dale is also constantly using the derogatory "F" word when referring to everyone. And he's clearly a blatant Misogynist because at the top of his youtube page he has a sketch of a dog with the words Bitch Management next to it. But I'll get into that a little bit later. Josh wanted me to do a analysis of his debate with professor Chip 'n' Dale so I'm adding that video link into the description below. Here's what Josh had to say: Hello Sandman, A couple days ago I found a video channel on Youtube titled Aca Demy. Which is hosted by a troll who calls himself "The Professor". This person who also runs a website by the name of "Manhood Academy" decided to post a video on his channel titled "MGTOW Cowards Exposed! Standing up to the Men going their own way Movement". While listening to the chipmunk modified voice, I began reading the comments and eventually came across your name. In the comment you invited Aca Demy to a live debate in person stating "SURE I'M A COWARD. I GO TO CAFE EVENTS, MRA EVENTS AND WILL BE AT THE UP AND COMING CONVENTION. I'LL DEBATE YOU IN PERSON AT THE MEN'S RIGHTS CONVENTION IN DETROIT. COME ON DOWN!". However Mr Demy never replied back to you, which honestly should not be much of a surprise. I however did respond to you saying "YOU SHOULD NOT FEED INTO HIS BULLSHIT. JUST MAKE ANOTHER ANALYSIS VIDEO ON YOUR CHANNEL BREAKING DOWN THIS IDIOT BECAUSE IT'S CLEAR THAT HE IS USING THESE DEBATES ON HIS WEBSITE TO ATTRACT TRAFFIC. PLEASE MESS UP THIS FOOL AND HIS WORTHLESS ACADEMY. ACA DEMY YOU HEARD THE MAN DETROIT OR NOTHING." I will like to thank PsychologicalCynic for taking the time out to engage the first debate and share his perspective on what it is to be a MGTOW. Despite the fact I was fully aware that Aca Demy was a troll and the best response for MGTOW's was to ignore him I decided to engage the fool. Now I must say Stardusk made a very good point about the fact that MGTOW should remain indifferent to opposition and let the message speak for itself. What do you think is the best response for MGTOW's to make when confronted by individuals such as Aca Demy? Thank You.Debating A MGTOW Mental Patienthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCsOo...Manhood Academy, selling social incompetencehttps://www.avoiceformen.com/men/manh...Sexually Harassing The Cult Leaderhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaDzB...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This video shows a seventeen year old guy getting assaulted by a woman at Hammonasset Beach in Madison, Connecticut by Andrea Mears. And I've also included a link to her facebook page in the description below. But it looks like she's taken down pictures of herself so that no one will recognize her face and contact her. I spoke with the guy also known as hogwit on youtube and received permission to show you his video clip. I asked the seventeen year old quad-copter pilot why he didn't take it to criminal court and he says that it has to be done through civil court. I'm also putting link to the indie gogo crowd sourcing campaign in the description below as well. So far he's managed to raise over a thousand dollars but he's planning on using the money for another issue now. And I'm not sure why that's happened. This is what Hogwit said with regards to taking this is what he told me: "Civil is the only type of lawsuit. There are civil lawsuits and criminal prosecutions, one is for crimes only and the other is for loss or damages regardless of the incident being a crime or not. Example: You are at fault in a car accident while driving within the law. You will not be prosecuted for a crime because no crime was committed, however the victim may sue you for damage to their car and injuries (both mental and physical)." This is Hogwit's official statement I found on Photography is not a crime dot com: I went to a nearby beach that is a whopping 2 miles long, setup, talked to some people that were curious what my "thing" was, demonstrated the loiter feature (pulling the quad to one direction or another), demonstrated rtl (flying it away then having it return), and make a lot of people think the quad was just awesome. I never went below 50 feet save for take off/landing, then after the end of my last flight, some crazy lady came over and started taking pictures of me...and dialed 911 for the 3rd time in 15 minutes...she said something to the effect of, "There's a guy here taking pictures at the beach with a helicopter plane." (I distinctly remember her saying, "with a helicopter plane," because that just sounds hilarious.) They basically said that they'd send someone when one gets free during each of the 3 calls she made, she decided they didn't care enough about someone obeying the law so when no one was around she assaulted me and she decided to stop when she got a phone call. I called the police to report the assault, and boy was the response big...10 or more vehicles arrived (cops, DEEP, and an ambulance)...They first listened to her story of lies (she claimed I was taking close ups of people in bikinis, and that she had asked me to stop flying before calling the police, and that I was the one that assaulted her, and and and). The police approached me very aggressively, believing her full story, and before anything else was said I brought up something that she missed... The fact that the cell phone in my hand has a camera...that was recording. I had video evidence that she went nuts completely unprovoked, and was the one that assaulted me. She was then charged with assault, and breach of peace and I gave the cops a copy of the video for their prosecution.Quadcopter Pilot Assaulted at Hammonasset Beachhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elnEN...Andrea Mears Facebook Pagehttps://www.facebook.com/ndrmearsIndie Gogo - Crowdsourcinghttps://www.indiegogo.com/projects/no...Photography is not a Crime Dot Comhttp://photographyisnotacrime.com/201...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I think your observation that feminism is the new religion is a valid one. Feminism is certainly dogmatic and preachy and it promises heaven on Earth for women while promoting the idea that white males are the great white Satan. They say that all men are rapists or potential rapists and that we are going to feminist hell because we objectify women and oppress women. Satan is or was supposedly fighting with god for the souls of human beings. Feminists say that men are fighting for control over women's bodies. The parallels are striking. And they say that men are always out to objectify. The objectification of women can be seen as the worship of false idols. Feminists want to say that men are not respecting the real woman, the person inside the body but are instead worshiping the female body itself. And that in a way it's sinful for men to give in to human nature. They are confusing objectification with biological imperatives. They don't see that when a man admires the female form it's usually his subconscious desire to procreate that's doing it. It's coded in his DNA to seek out physically attractive females and want to impregnate them. The last time a woman said all men are pigs I jumped up and said "If all men are pigs and they come from women, then women are just pigs with lipstick." After saying that I was no longer popular at that dinner party. Anyways, feminism is a belief system based on faith. It's based on the faith that all men are pigs and rapists. And that male behavior is evil and that men should be thrown under the bus for women's sake. Feminism and consumerism go hand in hand. Women got the right to vote in the early twentieth century as the rise of the consumer economy was happening. That's no coincidence and the two go hand in hand. Women became liberated and what they did was go on a shopping spree in the nineteen twenties. I don't blame women for wanting washing machines, stoves, fridges, Irons and other time saving devices early in the twentieth century. Early feminism was most likely promoted by people wanting women to have purchasing control in the household so they could then go out and purchase the surplus goods in society using debt. The feminist religion doesn't question debt and consumerism. If anything it seems to support the banking system which they don't seem to question as part of patriarchy. Yet I rarely hear them talk about how the banking system is raping the financial future of both males and females. Why don't the feminists talk about the amount of debt swirling around or that women are becoming debt serfs by taking on debt to get into university for degrees like art therapy or women's studies. My belief is that because of the prevalence of feminists in education they want women to pay money at the sacrificial alter of feminism in the form of tuition expenses. Why else would they create courses like women's studies to justify themselves a nice salary perhaps? In some cases women are getting into debt to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars for women's studies. Feminism much like the church before it has become institutionalized and corrupt. And I predict that much like the church it will be increasingly abandoned in the future.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Vernon Beck at the Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium. Event put on by The Canadian Maltese Charitable Services Trust.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I have a viewer question from Mason and he wants me to read his comment and answer a question. So here goes: "Hi Sandman. I have been watching your videos for several months now and I think you make some very good points. It has definitely made me realize that monogamy - currently at least - serves women more than men. I am 24 years old and I have been in several long term relationships with several women. Looking back, I notice there was an imbalance with the effort put in to those relationships, it was as though I was expected to be a chef, taxi driver, a therapist and secretary - it was always left to me to arrange when to meet and the only times the girls would arrange anything was for a family event or something highly structured, like I was a child. Yet these girls couldn't even cook an egg or drive a vehicle and chose not to work. I never minded doing nice things, I actually enjoyed it, until I began feeling unappreciated, which is where being a nice guy in a monogamous relationship inevitably leads, currently at least. The more I did, the more was expected, the misandry treadmill. In one of the cases the girl was acting as though sex was a 'favor' she was doing for me. As a result of this I ended up cheating, which I somewhat regret. Another girl I dated considered herself to be very intelligent, except from my perspective she was incapable of creative or divergent thinking. She couldn't see the pitfalls of modern society and pointing them out would end with hostile arguments because she had a blind respect for authority and took too much pride in being right, like you point out in your video, female narcissism on the rise. She chose to end the relationship shortly after I sold my car and would scab drinks off of other men at bars while we were dating. I consider myself a good looking guy, yet I was barely ever told so by these women, because I believe once women have a man, they want to reduce his self-esteem instead of increasing it."Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Hi Everyone Sandman Here, Today I had the privilege of shooting a video of Erin Pizzey at the first Toronto Domestic Violence Symposium. There were many speakers and I got lots of great talks that I will be sharing over the course of the following week. I also had the pleasure of meeting Erin Pizzey in person and speaking with her. She told me that women in Los Angeles are terrified of men going their own way and she completely supports our movement. She even mentions MGTOW at then end of this talk. So enjoy the video. Cheers!Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Late last year the supreme court of Canada called Canada's prostitution laws unconstitutional so the country was left in legal limbo when it came to buying and selling sex. And if nothing happened by then end of twenty fourteen then prostitution would have become legal in Canada. We would have seen red light districts, brothels and bunny ranches all over this country. Instead, the government has taken advantage of the fact that the existing laws are being thrown out by and now want to criminalize prostitution. Many sex workers believed that after the law was deemed unconstitutional they would be able to have body guards, drivers and would be allowed to do business from their homes. I don't think they were expecting anything like this. But the conservative government in Canada has decided to go in the opposite direction. Peter MacKay is currently the minister of Justice in Canada and yesterday he held a press conference to unveil Canada's new prostitution laws. So Canada won't be getting a series of new red light districts like many people were hoping for. Instead prostitution and the people involved in it in Canada are about to be punished under the full extent of the law. Peter MacKay says that the new model is being called a uniquely Canadian Model. But in reality Canada is getting the Nordic Model where the Johns are about to start paying fines and doing jail and prison time while the prostitutes are about to receive twenty million dollars in annual aid to help them get off the streets. So I'm sure that there will be many support organization vying for that money. Money that will essentially be transferred from male Johns and given to prostitutes to get them off the streets. The conservative government sees prostitutes as victims and johns as the victimizers. That's the bottom line here.Prostitution bill would make it illegal to buy, sell sex in publichttp://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/prost...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

So I finally got a chance to review Aaron Clarey´s book Bachelor Pad Economics. The book sells itself as the book that contains everything a man needs to manage his life. And that includes finances, education, career advice, entrepreneurship, women and retirement. I´m going to try and focus on all of the subjects he brings up but I´m hope to cover his advice on women as a main focus. The book Bachelor Pad Economics is not meant to be read from cover to cover but instead be used as a reference book for men at different stages of their lives. When it comes to I agree with Aaron that you have to select the right major because it´s going to change the entire course of your life. Aaron Clarey would have chewed me up for my major. I took Media in college. My parents thought it would have been a better idea for me to take psychology as my undergrad. Thank god I didn´t listen to them and did my own thing. Before starting my third year in college I realized that I wasn't going to get a job after finishing school. So I took the skills that I picked up to that point in college which were photography, video, film and web design and put them to use. So I started building an online advertising business while I was in school. And I was making as much money as my professors in my third year of college while the dot com boom was happening. Aaron says pick the right major but what about if you´re caught up in the middle of a bad major? Do you cut your losses or do you try to make the best of it? Luckily I made the best of it and upon graduation I had my own business to fall back on. I remember being so happy on graduation day because I had built my own job and was ready to go full blast the day after graduation. Most people on graduation day had a terrified look on their face and were pretending to smile. It was the most surreal thing I had seen up to that point in my life. It was my own ingenuity that got me out of that mess. And the money I made while in school paid for my education and I graduated debt free and with money in my pocket. How about that. My motto has always been D is for Degree. So if you are in a major with no future use those four years to build a business while barely passing your classes. That´s what I did. And that´s my unique advice to everyone. And I love Aarons advice: Want to be an actor start a youtube channel. Want to be on radio: Start a podcast. This is exactly what I did instinctively and now the same advice is in his book. The old men and women need the young to leech off of. That´s why it´s good to sidestep the whole thing. Aaron was also kind enough to send me a copy of his other book Worthless: The Young Person's Indispensable Guide to Choosing the Right Major. And it has a breakdown of both the benefits and disadvantages of taking certain college majors. But I don't want to spend too much time on helping men with their education and want to move onto other parts of the book. Just make sure you don't take a stupid college major like art therapy.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy