MGTOW Sandman Quotes

In case you missed it Elliot Rodger a 22 year old man from Santa Barbara decided to go on a killing rampage because not a single woman has given him attention in his entire life. The victims of the Elliot Rodger shooting include 4 men and 2 women. First he killed his three male roommates and then he went to a sorority house where he was planning on going inside and killing all of the women. Luckily when he knocked on the door they didn't let him in so he killed Katherine Cooper, Veronika Weiss and Christopher Martinez, all young people in their late teens and early twenties. Then he went off and randomly shot and wounded people on the street until his car crashed and the police found him dead inside from a self inflicted gunshot wound. And one more thing, Elliot Rodger was a feminist. You heard me I said the word "feminist." Do I need to prove to you he was a feminist? Of course not. All I have to say is that he was a feminist and people will believe me right? Feminists are claiming that Mr. Rodger was an MRA. Did they have to prove it? Of course not. As soon as this story broke Feminists started saying that Elliot Rodger was an MRA. And they claim that Elliot is an MRA because he was a member of the website PUAHate.com. But Elliot Rodger was not a PUA he was against pickup artists. And since pickup artists have often been associated with MRA's and MGTOWS does that mean he was against them as well? The PUAHate.com website is a place that describes itself as the 'Anti-Pickup-Artist Movement' because it believes that many so called dating gurus and seduction artists are scammers. And that all they care about is making money. But that doesn't seem to matter to the mainstream media and feminists. They want to take this story and twist the facts to target the Men's Rights Movement. This is telling me that the Men's Rights Movement is now on the feminists radar as a threat. First they ignored the men's rights movement. Then they started to ridicule it like in the video from Saturday Night Live. I'm including a link to that sketch so you can watch it and let me know. And now they are attacking Men's Rights head on and trying to say that it's directly related to mass murder. They are stretching the connection between PUA and MRA in a rediculous way and they are completely ignoring the fact that Rodger was against the PUA movement. That's like saying if someone joined a website that was against sexual abuse simply because that particular website had the word abuse in the title that would mean that person would be for abuse. By that same logic if I joined a website called ViolenceAgainstWomen.com then I would be in favor of being violent to women because the word violence is found in the title. Feminists are trying to paint MRA, PUA, MGTOW and any other term that means equality and fair treatment for men and trying to tarnish it by saying that the very use of such words is evil. Most people in society don't understand the meaning of terms like MRA or MGTOw. And many of us know that feminists are incapable of winning a rational argument so they are using guilt by word association here. They are not attacking men's rights directly but they are trying to define it as evil before society in large can understand what it means? They are scared and their behavior proves it.Elliot Rodger - Facebook Pagehttps://www.facebook.com/elliot.rodge...SNL Skit Savagely Attacks Pro-Life Activism and Conservativeshttp://madworldnews.com/watch-snl-ski...My Twisted World - The Story of Elliothttp://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/24...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is what Jeff has to say: "Hi Sandman, I recently discovered your videos after doing a Youtube search for "marriage not worth it." I went to a few videos before finding your "The Misandry Treadmill." I proceeded to watch your videos from the very first one forward. I instantly became a lifetime fan when I found your "My Journey into Mgtow" video. While watching that video, I kept thinking, "is this guy talking about my life?" A quick background about myself. I am a 29 year old in his final year of medical school. I had confidence issues in my first two years of medical school. It was likely due to my constant struggling for the first time in academics. Med school has a way of taking the highest-achieving science majors in college and then stratifying them. "Someone must fail," my school would tell me. I worked hard to stay afloat and had to retake exams. Anyway, during my second year, I decided to join a dating site. Like you, I wasn't too serious about it. I sent a few messages here and there and received a decent amount of replies. I think it had something to do with the part about my wanting to become a Cardiothoracic Surgeon. I ended up meeting "Jane" online, who was a 22 year old Junior at the undergrad college near my med school. She was studying biology, so we had some stuff to talk about. She told me she had dreams of become a Vet, which drew me to her as I thought she was more ambitious than the majority of the women I came across online. We met a few times. One day, she told me we should be in a relationship. I agreed. And then commenced my 2 years of hell. In the summer between my second and third year of med school, I allowed Jane to move in with me. Her rent had run out, and she said she'd pay me half the rent. Like an idiot blinded by love, I agreed. My third year of med school was as tough as the TV shows would have you believe. 12 to 15 hour days in the hospital; 6 to 7 days a week. Things started going downhill quickly. Jane didn't do housework, so I had to spend time cleaning the house (everything from cleaning the floors to washing the dishes). Jane became lazy. She had sporadic work (spotty hours), but she was able to pay the rent (though never on time). She bought animals that she couldn't afford and expected me to pay for their care.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A couple of days ago I got an email from Winston Wu. He didn't send me any money yet he wants me to cover his website HappierAbroad.com. So, sure I'll do a video about the happier abroad movement. But I'm not sure Mr. We is going to like everything I have to say. But then again you know what they say, all publicity is good publicity. Well I guess you're about to find out. In the description below I'm adding a link to HappierAbroad.com as well as a video I've done in the past about dating and marrying foreign women in case anyone missed it. I got a good chuckle when I visited Happier Abroad and read this paragraph on the website regarding foreign women versus American ones. This is what the website has to say: "Dating women comes easily and naturally. Women are sweet, friendly, feminine and down-to-earth. They are approachable, open, sociable, engaging, curious, and exude genuine warmth. Thus they are easier to meet and connect with. Females are generally thin and look wholesome. They cherish their femininity and have values. Women appreciate good men and seek a partner, not a competitor. Niceness counts. Flirtation with women creates energy and excitement. They are flattered by compliments and like being pursued. Men get dates easily just by asking. Not surprisingly, American men who date overseas usually report that they NEVER want to go back to dating American women again! So many of them have told me this, that it's almost become a cliché." Those are just some of the tasty words I found on the Happier Abroad website with regards to dating foreign women. And Winston Wu makes foreign women seem like they belong to a completely different species. He obviously just wants me to give him a plug and get free publicity for his service. But I'm here to warn you guys once again about the dangers of listening to a false bill of goods sold by guys guys like Winston Wu. He is selling men on the idea that not all foreign women are like that. Winston Wu also reminds of Tom Vu. Tom Vu guy that used to have infomercials on in the late eighties and early nineties with boat loads of women in Miami. He was selling people on the idea that they could get rich quick by coming out to his seminar. And Winston Wu is selling overseas tours to desperate American men looking for real women. The tours include Ukraine, Latin America, Asia and Russia. Winston Wu says that marriage is bad and I'm in total agreement with him but it seems like he is targeting desperate and disenfranchised American men with money to take overseas tours that promise love. Again there's nothing wrong if you're a man going overseas to meet women for fun. The trouble starts when you assume you can marry them or bring them home to North America or Europe. And that's what many of these women in poorer countries want. They want to trade their youth and bodies for a ticket over to the so called first world where they will more then likely leave your ass.HappierAbroadhttp://www.happierabroad.comForeign Women - MGTOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDjxb...HappierAbroad Star Wars Videoshttp://www.happierabroad.com/film.phpVladimir Zhirinovsky reveals the truth about womenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6Lx4...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today I want to talk about self actualized people. More specifically self actualized men. Being this way allows us to enjoy our lives free of guilt and shame. We see the world more rationally and logically then then others. And many men going their own way are self-actualized. So what does it being self actualized mean? The most important thing is that such individuals have an efficient perception of reality. We see it for what it is in as much of an unbiased way as possible and not fixated on what others think of him and yet he is strongly focused on problems outside of himself. According to Abraham Maslow the creator of Maslow's hierarchy of needs once self actualized men attain this status they start to seek out peak experiences. This can Explain why Nikola Tesla, Arthur Schopenhauer and Isaac Newton would seek out knowledge but not women. They were seeking out new peak experiences and I finally think I understand why they were motivated to work and succeed outside the need to impress females. Once you have one relationship you understand that they are predominantly the same. So instead of falling into that trap over and over again you seek out new and life altering experiences over and over again. According to Maslow a peak experience is "Feelings of limitless horizons opening up to the vision, the feeling of being simultaneously more powerful and also more helpless than one ever was before, the feeling of ecstasy and wonder and awe, the loss of placement in time and space with, finally, the conviction that something extremely important and valuable had happened, so that the subject was to some extent transformed and strengthened even in his daily life by such experiences." More interesting things about self actualized people is that their motivation comes from within and they can be both introverted and extroverted. This is something that I can related to. When I was younger and co-dependent on women I couldn't stand to spend too much time by myself. I enjoyed my own company but after a few days I would feel like a indoor house-cat and almost literally start scratching the walls. But today I feel like I can function well in both modes. I can spend weeks working alone on my videos with limited human interaction or I can go out and spend day after day working with different people. My emotion state no longer depends on the external validation or rejection of other people. I find fulfillment from within.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I've spent the last few days getting my hands on various articles trying to figure out why our society is giving rise to increasing numbers of female narcissists. I now suspect that all of the relationships I've had in my life except one were with women that were narcissists. The relationships started off being about "us" and then quickly shifted towards their happiness and desires in life. What I wanted was left in the dust. This is another big reason I go my own way. If a woman makes like about Me instead of We then there is no life for man. Maybe I'm naive and maybe it's always been like this. Maybe women in their twenties and thirties have been self-centered since the beginning of time. This all got started when I sent that girl Sailor Spoon a copy of the film American Psycho. I asked her if she had seen it before and she said she had. So I asked her what she thought about Christian Bale's Character, Patrick Bateman? She said she didn't like the stabbing scene in the shower. I quickly realized she was confusing the Alfred Hitchhock film Psycho with American Psycho. I proceeded to explain to her that they were two different films. At that point she couldn't accept the idea that she was wrong and that she had confused the two films. This is one of the first signs of a narcissist. They have to be right even when they are wrong and they are sensitive to criticism and praising them makes them happy. So she watched the film and I spoke with her later. She said she found the film interesting because Patrick Bateman had many similar qualities to her and she really appreciated how he would take care of his body and do facial treatments and how she also had a daily regiment. From the outside she said he was a guy she could relate to. When a woman tells you that she can relate to a fictional serial killer you do one of two things, you run away as fast as you can, or if you're like me you try to figure out what the fuck is happening here? And you try to understand her behavior. So I began looking at the Patrick Bateman character and quickly found out he has NPD or Narcissistic Personality Disorder combined with Psychopathic tendencies. He hates everyone and feels nothing except disgust with himself and rest of humanity. And he wants to inflict the same type of pain he feels onto others. I saw these qualities in her. She hates everyone. Is always in a bad mood unless being praised and wants to inflict pain onto others. When they inflict it back on her she cowers away. And I've noticed that many single women in their twenties, thirties and four-ties are increasingly exhibiting this type of behavior on me because when I work I don't show any interest in them. And only care about doing a good job.Is Female Narcissism on the Rise?http://www.psychforums.com/narcissist...#SELFIE (Official Music Video) - The Chainsmokershttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdemF...What, Me Care? Young Are Less Empathetichttp://www.scientificamerican.com/art...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is what Jeff has to say: "Hi Sandman, I'm attaching a question from a female friend who has the ability to think rationally. When she overheard a male friend and I talk about Feminism last night (specifically about how a man will have his life ruined the moment he is accused of rape and if the woman is found to have lied, she is punished at most with a slap on the wrist). Our female friend told us that she agreed with the hypocrisy that is Feminism. When we began talking about MGTOW and your channel, she added to our conversation by asking, "what can women do differently?" I feel that you may be the best person to answer this. Thanks" Well, thanks for your question Jeff. The first thing I would think about is why is this woman taking an interest in male/female relations. Can you see any possible selfish interest in her part? Is she interested in dating either you or your friend? What is her dating history and what is her experience with men? If she's pointing out the hypocrisy of Feminism why is she doing it? I really need to know more about this woman before I can figure out her motives and drives. But regardless of her opinions and personality I want to talk about what women should do in our society. This is just my opinion and it's based on what I'd like to see happen. It's not going to happen so my opinions are just a thought experiment. And I have no illusions of changing female nature. So the first thing I want to identify the woman that is the model for my understandingand as a measuring stick for women. We all see our mothers as the example of what women should be like. Even if we hate or don't get along with our mothers. My mother is a hard worker. Before she retired she put one hundred and twenty percent effort in her job, one hundred and twenty percent effort as a homemaker. She got into medical school when she was younger and although she didn't finish because her family was poor and she couldn't get money to finish school she is my model for what a woman should be. She is also a gifted artist. And she puts effort into keeping herself as attractive as possible for her age. But even with all the good qualities she is still a hormonal woman. She has frequent emotional outbursts directed at my father and shaming language directed at me. She still wastes resources on things that many of us men see as irrational. She has many of the bad and stereotypical traits that we have spoken about on MGTOW. But with my mother she is like Miss Jackal and Mrs. Hyde. One moment she is just as rational as a man and I can talk to her like any other man and a few seconds later an emotional switch goes off in her head and she becomes like a vicious caged animal. She was born in the nineteen fifties in Eastern Europe. Women coming of age in Eastern Europe in the late nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies seemed to have had many of the qualities that men today would want. They were born in a time and place where they learned traditional home-making skills and knew how to cook, clean and sew and just saw it as something that women did for the household. They were taught by their fathers to be soft spoken and not brought up to raise their voices to men. And at the same they went out into the working world and made money and were also mothers.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today I'm releasing my next installment in my God Among MGTOW Series. This one is about the famous petroleum geologist M. King Hubbert who went his own way and stood up to the Shell Oil Company in 1956. I usually don't feature men that are married and have families in this series. But the reason I'm featuring him is because this man had the strength to stand up for the research, regardless of what the company paying him told him to do. So let me take you back to 1956. In that year Marion King Hubbert or M. King Hubbert as he is sometimes referred to was working as a geoscientist for the Shell oil company in one of their laboratory in Houston, Texas. On March 8th, 1956 he made a speech to the Southern Section of the American Petroleum Institute in San Antonio Texas. He was about to go up on stage and present his speech that day but was signaled to leave the stage. In what was a last minute phone call the public relations staff at the Shell Oil company begged him to tone down the parts of his speech that they considered to be sensational. However he didn't do this and instead decided to go his own way instead. He didn't do what people in his own company told him to do. We went on stage and told his audience that oil production in the United States was going to reach a peak or maximum rate of production for conventional oil in 1970. Many of the people in the audience thought he was a crackpot. In some weird way he was like Galileo telling men that the world was flat. He told everyone that United States conventional oil production would peak in 1970 at 3 billion barrels of oil production per year. In reality it peaked in 1970 at 3.4 billion barrels and has never recovered to those levels. Even with Alaska in the nineteen seventies and nineteen eighties and today's Oil Fracking boom it never rose above that point and if oil production from fracking goes into decline within the next 5 years as is predicted by many of today's petroleum geologists then that will mean oil production will continues to decline. I know many of you are skeptics and will say if only the US government would allow for more offshore drilling then everything will be alright. And that the US government is holding back US oil production. On the contrary the US government is doing whatever it can to bend over backwards to the oil companies. They are giving them permits to frack most of America's oil shale. We are in the midst of giant oil boom in North America. But it's not going to last as production starts to peak out and go into decline. Marion King Hubbert is guy most of you haven't heard of before but in the coming decades as global oil production goes into terminal decline you will most likely be hearing his name.People mocked Hubbert and criticized him because up to that point in history more and more oil was being found all of the time back then. It was being found faster then humanity could burn it up. Today for every new barrel of conventional oil we find we burn three. And most of the non-conventional oil is uneconomical at current prices and requires one hundred and fifty to two hundred barrels to be produced for a profit. President Jimmy Carter - Address to the Nation on Energyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tPeP...The End of Suburbiahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3uvz...Updated Natural Gas Production UKhttp://www.eia.gov/countries/country-...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"Hello Sandman, The topic I wish for you to cover is being male and single. It seems as if it's always been socially unacceptable for a male to be single, and I'm not completely certain as to why. One personal example of this takes me back a number of years when I had dinner with an old school teacher and his wife. As we waited for our food, my teachers wife began asking me different questions in an attempt to get to know me better. She asked the usual questions, but eventually she got around to the matter of relationships. First she asked if I were married and I kindly told her no. Next she asked if I were engaged and I told her that I wasn't, and the third question was if I had a girlfriend. For the 3rd time I told her no. Looking back I'm not terribly surprised at her line of questions, but it was her reaction that puzzled me. After my 3rd no, she had this confused and disappointed expression on her face. After her barrage of questions, my mind was thinking gee lady sorry to let you down! This isn't some rare occurrence either as I've spoken with other male friends over the years that have given me similar stories. Over the years, I can't remember any female friends or acquaintances going through anything similar. It seems as if societies reaction to a single woman is along the lines of "girl power", or "you go girl, you don't need a man!" But if you're a man and single it's the total opposite. To me people generally respond to single men as if they're failing to meet some societal obligation. A single man can get any reaction from "well why don't you have a girl?", "are you at least dating anyone?" or in the extreme somebody might suggest "he's probably gay!" Maybe a year or two ago, a female friend asked why I'm single. My answer was that I don't want to be in a relationship, but promptly her response was that I lacked confidence! What does confidence have to do with anything I wondered. A woman can choose to be single and it's completely fine, but a man can't do the same. What's your take on this? Thanks for your question NEVER MIND. You've described a lot of different situations and I'll take them one at a time.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I'm going to cover something that's been on my mind for a while. And that topic is the wild west or the mantopia as I've coined it. When I'm talking about the Wild West I'm referring to a specific period of the time in the mid to late nineteenth century in two countries. Those places being the United States and Australia. When people watch wild west films they are often set in the Western United States. And most people will be shocked to learn that part of Australia also had a version of the wild west. It wasabout settling a hot and dry climate just like the gold rush in California. As the industrial revolution and the railroad were starting to gain momentum in North America and Australia those two countries opened up gold mining to the public for the first time in history. In the past most countries were ruled by Monarchs and the gold in and on the ground was owned by the monarchs. And hence it was illegal for men to dig up the gold that belonged to the king or queen. So when gold was discovered in California in 1848 the mining was opened up to everyone. People from the Eastern United States rushed to find gold in the South West of America. All of the pictures I'm showing you in this video are from a small gold rush town call Ballarat in Australia. But getting back to the idea that the Wild West was a Mantopia. It has a lot to do with the idea that in many early mining towns there were no women besides the prostitutes that followed the miners. If you watch the AMC show called Hell on Wheels you'll also see the prostitutes that follow the railway workers across the plains. The early wild west was so devoid of female influence that men were free to gamble, drink and take financial risks they would never be able to take if they were married. Men were free to do anything they wanted because the law was also loose just like the women. Men were the most free they had been in all of civilized history. Local lawmen were unable to police the frontier properly. Women were not there to nag and tell men what to do. And there were no monarchs or governments to tax men. That's why I see that period of time in history as the ultimate Mantopia. If anyone has any other ideas about what the ideal society for men looks like I'd love to hear it.How the Wild West was tamed by MAIL-ORDER BRIDEShttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Dean wrote to me with a lot of personal issues he wants help with. I'm paraphrasing what he has to say: "Hi Sandman my name is Dean, I'd like to tell you a bit of a story about myself and my background. One thing I want to point out though is how women in America & Canada from what you say seem to be more stubborn and self-obsessed than here in Australia. Perhaps that is something you can look into though I don't know how you would go about that and I have limited experience with women so I can't help you too much there. My reason for making the leap to writing to you came from your video "Suicide as Revenge -- MGTOW" but I'll get into those details a bit later. I'd like to say how, 'much like my recent acceptance of Atheism' the MGTOW ideas have opened my eyes up on having more critical thinking skills. I used to be extremely gullible and naïve. My Mormon upbringing and dreaming of "love at first sight" was just horrible in helping me to develop the ability to think and assess a situation by myself. I was even scared to approach someone at a counter to order food. With my attempts at online dating though oasisactive.com I am also wary of women I meet on there and always look out for the ways of deception that is the female mind. I'm not a particularly attractive person, probably a 3-4/10 and that gives me a very different approach to a lot of things than you however I do have an athletic body and like to maintain that. It's extremely hard to get any attention let alone keep it. As much as I would like to I don't get to play the games that you talk about with women. If you haven't figured it out by now I'm a bit of a purple pill'er. I find it hard to be able to avoid being wanted or loved by someone, yet I am now aware of the games and strategies that women use. Back to the online dating I have often found women just stop contact after meeting once. Which in all honesty, if there not interested that's fine, but for Christ sake I wish they would just say how they feel and not just disappear like I'm an inanimate object with no feelings. Is it really hard to just say "I'm not interested"? I also seem to often get the fat ones. I'm happy to accept someone who is at my level of attractiveness but legs like a F-ing tree trunk and they say "a little overweight" I hate that lying bullshit." Well thanks for your comments Dean I know it's only part of what you have to say but I'm going to tackle it before I move on to the rest of your comments.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy