MGTOW Sandman Quotes

I was sitting around in the backyard shooting the shit with my friend Peter and we were discussing the idea of men and women. He has now been completely converted over to the MGTOW dark side after our conversation. The most interesting thing we spoke about were the dynamics between male and female sexual marketplace value. Why do some men value certain women over others as long term and short term partners and why do women value some men over others for their short term and long term attachments. We also discussed the idea of why there are a lot men out there that would be considered a seven or an eight on the attractiveness scale but they are with women that are overweight and unattractive and stack up being fours and fives. And the consensus we reached is that sometimes an attractive man will date a less attractive woman because the expectation is there that she will be grateful for him being in a relationship with her. And because of her gratefulness to meet a better looking partner above her class level that will mean she will be faithful to him and not rock the boat for fear that he will leave the relationship. I've been guilty of doing this in my past relationships. I would date women that were lower maintenance where I was the catch and they were in need of rescue. The reason I did this was because I thought I had power in those relationships. I was better off physically, financially and had higher social status. I guess to some extent I was doing this consciously but there were also elements of it that were unconscious. I thought it was a great idea because I would often see very attractive women that would date and marry men that were beneath their level of attractiveness. In such situations the situations would often work out because the women were able to control their men and make sure they never went anywhere and remained faithful while they themselves went out and had sex with far more attractive men on the side. I thought to myself what a great strategy, minus the cheating part. I thought I could get together with a woman that was worth less then me with regards to her sexual marketplace value and I wouldn't have to stress out about her running off with another man because she had effectively already lucked out on me. And most importantly, not to toot my own horn or anything she would stay with me and be grateful for being with someone she perceived better then herself. How wrong I was. If a woman dates a less attractive man then herself he's usually grateful to her. But if a more attractive man dates a less attractive woman then she doesn't feel grateful. Instead she eventually gets comfortable and then eventually sees her own sexual market value rise. Although her looks are the same or have gone downhill she sees herself as better looking and tries to take over the relationship like a more attractive woman would. Her perceived sexual marketplace value rises. And she perceives that his marketplace value has fallen, even if it's actually gone up. But men that are in relationship with more attractive women don't seem to see themselves as higher class simply because they are manginas doing the bidding of a woman that perceives herself as a princess or goddess. They remain humble. Both sexes perceive their value differently even though they are in the exact same social or relationship situation. It's all about personal perception.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by Craig and he has many comments and questions and this what he has to say: "Hey Sandman, Are you familiar with phonesex sites like Niteflirt? If you peruse through some of the listings there, you'll probably recognize a lot of themes that MGTOWs discuss (not specifics, mind you, but broader themes). What most women offer there aren't vanilla phonesex services, but rather to play their part in fetishes that typically fall into the category of female domination. Some of these are about humiliating men sometimes verbally (e.g. mocking on their social status, financial status, penis size) and/or coercing guys to do humiliating things (e.g. wearing women's clothing, to eating their cum, or fuck themselves with a dildo, etc). Or sometimes it's about fantasies of something humiliating being done to them (e.g. role playing being cuckolded, raped with a strapon, raped by another man, or having their penis locked in a chastity device not allowing them to get an erection). Other ones are about blackmail and financial domination. A lot of women on Niteflirt offer "consensual blackmail" where they coerce men in to giving them personal information or even access to their personal computers using remote desktop software to access their personal data. They then tell men to do things for them, or they threaten to do something embarrassing with their personal data. Sometimes this is done during "forced intoxication" calls were men drink as much as the woman on the other end tells them, until they're so drunk they won't remember what they're doing. A lot of women who offer this say they want men to do it so they'll spill all of their secrets and and they can "get inside their head." Some women also claim to be able to hypnotize men over the phone and do the same kind of thing. ... I'm more or less okay with people doing whatever gets them off. I'd imagine most of these interactions basically amount to elaborate and expensive fetishes, although I know there have been cases of unquestionable abuse and blackmail. But I'm not trying to make a case for or against Niteflirt or sites like it. What's interesting to me, and what I'd like to hear your thoughts on, is what the existence of a large number of men with these kinds of fetishes means for MGTOW and for fighting gynocentrism. It seems that a lot of men are turned on at some level by the thought of women exploiting them (enough to blow hundreds or thousands of dollars on sites like Niteflirt). These fetishes make explicit what's implicit in a gynocentric world view; men are only good for being controlled sexually or financially by women. Is it possible that some parts of men's brains evolved to accept their role in gynocentrism, and that these fetishes "hijack" that part in the same way that drugs are said to hijack the reward centers of the brain? If so, do you think it's possible part of the reason there's male resistance to men's rights and MGTOW is because many men are essentially turned on by feminists who want to manipulate them and that treat them like they're disposable? I know that's a long circuitous topic for a video, but I would be very interested in what you think. Thank You!" Well that's what Craig has to say and I'm completely in agreement with his reasoning. I used to get pleasure taking care of my ex girlfriend. Cooking for her, cleaning for her, giving her attention. Essentially being a slave brought me pleasure. I've spent fifteen years of my life conditioning my brain to accept reality in that way. Now I'm working very hard to rewire my neural pathways to no longer be a simping man servant. Men are naturally slaves to women. We want the dopa-mine from our sexual partners and experiences. We want to feel pleasure. But like you said there is a part of our brain that has evolved to accept gynocentric behavior and control from women.Can Oxytocin Get Me A Boyfriendhttp://www.popsci.com/science/article...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This video is brought to you by a donation from Christopher. He didn't have a particular subject he wanted me to cover so I thought I'd talk about something that's been on my mind for a while now and it's women and pets. Last time I checked there are no crazy cat men that I've heard of. It seems that women are the ones that are collecting animals and hoarding them in their apartments. They find them cute and cuddly and enjoy coming home to animals instead of human beings. In fact most of the women that I've dated except for one preferred animals to human company. I'm guessing that men are utilities to most women, other women are potential competition and children are a possession. My ex used to say to me all the time that her prized cat was like her child and she would keep that cat alive as long as possible. The last two years of that's cat were filled with suffering and trauma. I wished she could have put the cat down before the situation got bad but she couldn't accept the reality that her cat was going to die until she was holding it dead in her arms. My Ex girlfriend also had a dream to own a cat ranch. She wanted to build a miniature city in some country backwater town where she could bring rescued cats to a new home. She would have them fixed so they couldn't have any more kittens and then have hundreds of cats wandering around in a park like setting in nature. And of course I would probably have to spend the rest of my days surround by cats and my crazy cat lady girlfriend. I told her it was a bad idea because the cats would attract foxes, and other wild animals. Those Wild animals would come and eat the cats and she said that wouldn't happen. I just rolled my eyes knowing full well that those cats were going to attract all kinds of wild animals. I couldn't believe how much rational thought went out the window out of her mind when she saw a stray cat in the alleyway or when she went over to friends house and saw their animals. And she's not the only one. I know dozens of women that keep animals around and pretend that they are her children. They buy them toys, feed them treats and make the men they supposedly love suffer with those animals around. So why are women obsessed with pets? How feeding and caring for 800 million pets hurts Mother Naturehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/h...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Abdellah and this is the question he wanted me to ask: Hi Sandman, I would like to know your thoughts on where society is heading in the future, and what will be the influence of MGTOW in the future society? It would be great if you could look at some of these factors that might be of influence in that future. Well that's what Abdellah has to say. His question is very broad and I'll try to narrow it down to socioeconomic ramifications. Right now the MGTOW movement is still in its incubator stage. It's numbers have grown in the last few years but by the number of video views and repeat subscribers to my channel as well as many others I feel that it has reached a temporary plateau. From the middle of two thousand and ten until January of twenty fourteen it has grown exponentially in a hockey stick pattern. And since then interest in the movement has been on a bumpy plateau. My data comes from a simple google trends search and I'm adding a link in the description below to the search results I found. I've also noticed a steady increase in searches for men's rights. So I'm not sure if the MRAs are holding people's attention more lately. Or men are getting involved in the MRA movement and not going mgtow because they find Men's Rights enough for them right now? But both MRA and MGTOW are growing their numbers. Two thousand and thirteen was the year of the MGTOW and two thousand and fourteen is shaping up to be the year of the MRA. But getting back to MGTOW I see the movement gaining real power if we face another recession and more men get divorced and see the true nature of women as they get kicked the curb because they aren't employed providers. I don't think the rise in MGTOW back in 2009 was a fluke. I think it was directly tied to the economic situation back then. After all it was a touted as many people as a man-cession because more men lost their job then women. More men were plumbers, electricians, carpenters and bankers in 2008. Once the housing market blew up and their unemployment insurance ran out they faced the full wrath of unsatisfied females in many cases and this led to greater numbers of divorces. But it also reduced the number of people getting married in general. After-all unemployed men can't afford to purchase for diamond rings for women. I'm adding a link to an article called "Is the Great Recession Linked to a Decline in Marriage?" in the description below. This article speaks about the idea that when the economy gets bad couples tend to cohabit-ate and delay getting married and delay having children. So recessions slow men down from proposing to a woman. So in the future as our society faces greater economic turmoil, especially after the shale oil and gas boom then the marriage rate will plummet. This in turn has the effect where people that co-habitate get into and out of relationships far easier then those that are married. And they tend to be more childless as well. So a bad economy will mean more men going their own way. Two thousand and fourteen has been a good year economically in the United States so maybe that's why we are seeing a plateau in the interest in MGTOW. When the economy goes bad again at some point women blame men for it and blame men for being poor providers. Men in turn have their self esteem destroyed and look for a rational reason why women are dumping them or angry with them. So men explore the internet and find out about the men going their own way movement and our numbers continue to grow. It's unfortunate but it seems that things have to get worse before they get better. Energy scarcity and other resource scarcity in the future will mean that more men will question what women want from life. And more men will go their own way because they will either be unable or unwilling provide women with the lifestyle they are accustomed to or because they will not want to work themselves to death doing it. Going their own way will be a more of an option because men will have far fewer assets to risk losing to women. Men don't have a social safety net to fall back on.Google Trends MGTOW and Men's Rightshttp://www.google.com/trends/explore#...Is the Great Recession Linked to a Decline in Marriage?http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/1...GirlWritesWhat+Stardusk: Evo-Psych, MRM, Autopilot,"Love" and morehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enqor...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A big thank you to Jacob for his donation and for making this video possible. Originally he wanted me to cover the topic of men being able to control their sex drives. But I've already spoken about that in my video called carnal pleasures which I'm adding a link to in the description below. So instead I'm covering the topic of women and government or social assistance. Also known as welfare. I'm sure most of you remember sailor spoon the girl the girl I spoke about in earlier videos. But there were some things I never told you guys about her. The most important fact is that she was collecting welfare or social assistance as she likes to call it. But the truth is she doesn't need it to survive. Last I heard she was volunteering to teach foreign languages at a local school. And back then she was worried that her welfare checks would be cutoff. She was also subletting a room in the basement apartment she was renting. So she took in a roommate and collected $600 cash from that roommate while getting about six hundred dollars in social assistance. She preferred to use the term social assistance instead of welfare because it sounds nicer and doesn't have the stigma associated with welfare. So there she was collecting "welfare" of six hundred dollars, six hundred from her roommate and doing odd babysitting and tutoring jobs on the side. And she was also getting her parents to probably give her three to four hundred dollars a month. On all sides she was getting money probably about fifteen hundred each month after tax and she didn't have to work for. Not bad for a Welfare Queen. The government is supporting her, her roommate is supporting her and her parents are supporting her. This woman was type of woman that mgtow have come to hate. She is a moocher, she uses men to fix her apartment, buy her things and if you looked up parasite in thedictionary there she'd be with her spoon shaped nose. The last time I spoke to her about a month and a half ago she was in the process of getting a part time waitress job and a part time call center job. She hated both jobs and together they paid her less then the welfare and roommate schemes she had going. Her rent was also eight hundred so with the Roommate's money the rent really cost her two hundred dollars. So for her it was easier to quit her call center job and continue to collect social assistance or welfare the to work. She claims to have worked her entire life but I was impressed by her ability to find as many opportunities to take from others ass possible. And she seemingly did this without a care in the world.Carnal Pleasureshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oOyc...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Back in February Karen Straughan did a talk at Ryerson University on a topic called: "Are Men Obsolete?" And I'm including a link to that video in the description below. The idea that men are obsolete is ridiculous. Very little would get built, repaired or invented if men weren't busy doing the work of building and maintaining civilization. But the topic of male obsolescence got me thinking about female obsolescence. What would need to happen in society to make women obsolete? Yesterday I briefly touched upon this idea and how virtual worlds that interface with the male mind directly can create a scenario where women would be obsolete. Male obsolescence is predicated on machines replacing male muscle to do the work. Oil and other fossil fuels have replaced most of the male muscle power as well as animal power that we used primarily up until the industrial revolution. Female obsolescence on the other hand is based on developing other types of machines to do the sexual and reproductive labor for men. So, speaking hypothetically here, how would society go about the business of making women obsolete? What would have to happen for it to become a reality? I think it would take a combination of male sexual satisfaction and the artificial womb. And I'm going to look at sexual gratification first. To a large extent internet pornography is allowing men to free themselves from women. Many men are using porn as a way to fulfill some of their needs with regards to having their sexuality. The visual part of sexual stimulation. Porn is a good way to release sexual tension but it still falls short with regards to the physical closeness of sex but it also means no unwanted pregnancy and disease. I think the reason women take offense to pornography is because it represents the first step in making women obsolete. Why do you think women are working as hard as they can to get plastic surgery, perfect makeup, tons of clothing. They are competing for male eyeball attention with other women, pornography, video games and all types of other distractions. Free internet pornography is certainly having an effect on younger men in their teens and twenties. Young guys are increasingly saying they don't want to date or give spoiled girls and women any attention. An entire generation of men is starting to think with their big heads because pornography is providing a relatively viable substitute for ordinary human sexuality. Men in their early thirties and older didn't have the same access to porn until about teen to fifteen years ago. I probably wouldn't have spent as muchtime dating in my teens if I had access to a multiverse full of pornography. Are Men Obsolete?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e92u5...The most realistic female android ever!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy7xG...ROBOT ACTRESS STEALS THE SHOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSa3D...3D projector creates life like hologramshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlanG...Customized Mind Doll Programhttp://www.shop.talmadgeharper.com/Cu...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

So I decided to try tinder for a couple of weeks to see if I could go on some dates and share some stories about it. I wanted to know what the difference between more traditional online dating sites and tinder really were. And I find that ultimately it's just as bad as bad as Plenty of Fish and OK Cupid when I tried those last summer. The only advantage for men it seems to be is that women don't know a man's height from the photos they see on tinder. Most guys can still see if a woman is overweight or chubby from their pictures but women don't know the height of man. And the app doesn't force you enter that information. So the conversations I would usually encounter on tinder would usually be like this: "Hi how tall are you?" or "Have you ever been married before or do you have any kids?" Women on tinder instantly want to know if you will be a tall dark provider and want to make sure your money isn't already being shackled down to an ex wife and children. Their demands seem fairly straight forward to me. But tinder is taking female entitlement to a whole other level. Average and below average women are starting to behave and feel far above average then they really are because they are getting far more attention and this seems to be the norm. What I also found interest is the idea that women are more likely to message me on Tinder then in the past on dating sites. There is no bullshit associated with writing a witty and thought provoking profile or any other crap like that. It's all about appearances and your photos. It's pure glorification of the selfie dating culture. In the past the lower quality women would have been lucky to get a handful of dates with men they met through friends and in real life. Now they are getting far more male attention. And probably going on a couple dates a month or lets say twenty four dates per year on average. And let's say ten percent of those men are guys with money that like to show off. I do my best to hide my wealth instead of flaunt it. If someone doesn't accept the fact that I choose to drive a ten year old car then that's their problem. Or if they think I'm being cheap for keeping a two year old cel phone then that's also their problem. I don't see the need to get rid of perfectly useful and functional physical objects in my life simply because they are not in style or because I can afford to purchase new ones. Why would I get into debt to make some fat banker wealthier then he already is. But also keep in mind that this is my first real date since I was twenty one years old.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I have to thank Vention MGTOW for his donation for this video. He sent me some bit coins in a way I can actually use them and it's much appreciated. Thank you very much! If and when I finish my MGTOW book I'll have to send him a copy as a thanks. In the city I live in there are quite a few old free masons lodges and temples that are scattered around. For today's video I went around and took these pictures. Three of them are of lodges and temples and one of the buildinsg I'm going to show you has sacred Masonic geometry. More specifically the histogram. Many people think of it as the Star of David in the Jewish Religion but it's used in many cultures. According to the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry ""The interlacing triangles or deltas symbolize the union of the two principles or forces, the active and passive, male and female, pervading the universe ... The two triangles, one white and the other black, interlacing, typify the mingling of apparent opposites in nature, darkness and light, error and truth, ignorance and wisdom, evil and good, throughout human life." So essentially Freemasonry recognizes that men and women are opposite or like Ying And Yang. And the first printed constitution of free masonry apparently bans women from the practice. But there are many cases where women were admitted as well in masculine only masonic bodies. One woman Salome Anderson was put in American papers in 1892 as the only female Freemason in the world. Apparently she hid in lodge room in her uncles house and learned the masonic secrets so she was pledged into secrecy. I don't really believe this idea of a woman hiding in a Masonic Lodge and then being discovered and brought into Masonry. And that story has been used in order to excuse free-masonry as an institution for choices to include women in the practice. It's nearly impossible for a woman dressed like a woman to enter a Masonic Lodge without the obvious fact that she's a woman. There is even a tale about a French Madame that dressed up as a man to enlist in the French Army. Again this is a story and not verifiable. But the idea that she was willing to sacrifice her life by joining the army must have meant that she was seen as an equal by men and made a member of a male only secret society. Personally I think that male secret societies even if they have rules that forbid women from joining will often let women join because many men are weak when it comes to having women around. And in many cases with things such as freemasonry it's often the wives and the daughters of the men in the lodges that are selected to become members. It's a form of nepotism. If the women that were being selected were the most rational and possibly even Nawalts then I wouldn't be bringing any of this up. Instead it seemed like family choice to bring women into male only free masonry. There is also Co-Freemasonry for both men and women. And there were also exclusive female lodges. But the ironic thing is women have co-freemasonry and exclusive women's lodges and yet that's not enough. They still have to go and force their way into the male only freemasonry groups.Aaron Russo talks Rockefeller Elite (12 Minutes)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gwcQ...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday about the state of men in Asia and how they are raised and treated differently in Asia then they are in North America and Europe. In some Asian cultures there are child or baby grooms going back to tradition that were married when they are nine or ten years old to fourteen year old girls. Boys in Asia for the most part have been so prized through history that they get babied by their mothers. That's why my friend says that as an Asian woman she is more interested in Western men. Because according to her Asian men have a hard time doing things for themselves because they have been taken care of most of their lives and haven't learned responsibility or how to do things for themselves. They have been babied. I also brought up the question of salary men in Japan and she told me that the reason men in Japan are given strict allowances in Japan is because they were never properly raised to manage money because taking care of money is something more female dominated. Men were kept this way so they don't know how to do seemingly anything for themselves and the only thing they are pushed to do is work and provide a paycheck and work from seven am to ten pm at night. That's what she told me. And it's a perspective that many of us haven't heard before. The whole idea of baby grooms is insane. To take a man before he's a man and put him with a teenage girl that takes over the duties of his mother as well as the sexual duties once he reaches his teenage years is to stunt his development as a man. My belief is that Asian women are scared at the power found inside of independent Asian men. And it's like Asian women are trying to make sure that men never have true self respect and independence. She told me this is one of the big issues she has with Asian men. Many of them can be emotionally stunted because of that babying they receive and many of them can be very loud, obnoxious and vulgar because they have been spoiled through their formative years. Effectively they are big spoiled babies. And they have to listen to their mothers and wives and achieve at work so that the women can continue to spoil them at home. Again a lot of this is her opinion but I'd love to hear what everyone else thinks.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

After putting out yesterday's video on the magic wallet maneuver someone posted in the comments section and said that by using the magic wallet men are just as bad as women because that's our version of the shit test on them. Women put men through shit tests to see what they can get away with and how big of a push over a man really is. Men on the other hand put women through them for a different reason and it has to do with trust. Most blue pill men still believe that women can be trusted so male shit tests are all about testing that trust. He wants to know that he can trust her with secrets, money and the fact that she won't cheat on him. One guy once told me a story about how when he worked as a contractor people would always test his trust. They would clear out all the furniture from a room before it need to be painted or the floor had to be sanded. But one time he noticed that a would always notice that people would always leave a quarter or in Canada a one dollar coin on the ground clearly there as a shit test. Contractors are notorious for stealing money but this guy was honest. So one time he went to a clients house and found a one dollar coin on the ground and instead of picking it up he reached into his pocket and pulled out a one dollar coin and put it next to the other one dollar coin and finished up shop for the day. The next day he returned to painting and both one dollar coins were gone and in their place was a two dollar coin. So he bent down and put a two dollar coin next to the other two dollar coin. The next day he comes back and the two two dollar coins were gone. And in their place was a five dollar bill. So he drops a five dollar bill and adds a quarter as well to raise the bet so to speak. Later on the person who hired him said he was one of the most interesting people he had ever met. And the two of them built trust through humor and the ongoing joke that took four days to play out. The whole thing was a shit test between two men. But in some ways it was kind of a shit test based on trust. And men shit test women so they can see if they are trustworthy. And women shit test men to see the strength of their emotional resolve. Women want strong men so that don't fold like a cheap suitcase and can continue providing for themselves and their children even when the pressure is on. That seems to be the case many times.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy