MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Paul. And today's topic is about the magic wallet maneuver. In the 1814 Novella (Peter Schlemiel's Miraculous Story) the main character Peter sells his shadow to the Devil for a bottomless wallet called the gold sack of Fortunatus. But in the story both society and the woman he love reject him because he has no shadow. Are we really to believe that a woman wouldn't sell her husband's or boyfriends shadow if he had access to a bottomless wallet through him? Am I the only one that thinks the concept for such a story is ridiculous I for one think most women would sell their husbands hair, arms, legs, kidneys, liver and even his brain if they could get access to a limitless or bottomless wallet. He could be a stump with lungs and I've met women that would gladly see men suffer so they could live with unlimited access to resources. So this story is kind of unbelievable. Hell Peter Schlemiel could have just found himself a blind woman that wouldn't care about his shadow and that would love him for him. And he wouldn't have to tell her that he didn't have a shadow. But this video isn't about a fairy tale. This story is about a real life man I know also called Peter and he has a Magic Wallet maneuver of his own. He's a mgtow that still dates and he's not willing to settle for anything less then a rare nawalt or unicorn. He always says that money won't bring you happiness but it sure lets you suffer in style. And that he does. But his magic wallet is a technique he uses on women once they start shit testing him on dates or trying to blow him off. What he does is carry five to ten thousand dollars in his wallet when he goes on dates. And if a woman is no longer interested in him and put him through shit tests and starts to talk down to him he brings out the magic wallet. Here in Canada one hundred dollar bills are brown, fifties are red, twenties are green, tens are purple and fives are blue. So he stacks his wallet with a technicolor rainbow of money and makes sure to stack the hundreds and fifties as high as he can before shoving him into his wallet. And he makes the wallet just thick enough so it barely closes. When the date turns sour he puts his wallet and his key-chain which has keys to a beamer onto the table where he's taking his date and then watches as his lady friends eyes start to glaze over. Often times a woman that told him she wasn't interested five minutes earlier asks him when she can see him again. Again that number is 95% of the time based on his observations.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Eric and this is what Eric has to say: "I've sent you a donation to ask you to talk about pick-up artists and the perception feminists and yourself have of them. What is the usefulness of PUAs in the men's rights and MGTOW situation and battle? I know that feminists despise them, I think it's a good sign, don't you?" Well, thank you for your question Eric. I know you have more to say and I'll switch gears and talk about the other part of your question a bit later. Regarding Pick Up Artists of course feminists hate them because they aren't about commitment and marriage. Therefore pickup artists are men that use deception to trick women into giving away their golden vagina for literally a song and a dance in many cases. Women hate Puas the way men hate gold diggers. And the woman that falls for a pua is being played just as much as a nice guy mangina that takes a woman out to dinner and pays for dinner over and over again. Like my buddy I spoke about that was budgeting five hundred dollars a month for dates. Puas are predators of sluts and gold diggers are predators of manginas. Both groups are higher up on the sexual food chain, the puas and gold diggers. It's also kind of ironic because most people in our society hate gold diggers, manginas, sluts and pickup artists. When I see pua in action it's like a crocodile jumping out of the river and catching a water buffalo. And a gold digger is often like a lion chasing a baby zebra and taking it down. We want to root for the underdog but not when the underdog has very little self esteem which is what many sluts and manginas seem to lack. A woman that spreads her legs for the entire football team and the man that bends over backwards for a shit testing woman both have very little self esteem and it's sickening to see as well. This I believe is the root behind equality. And I think that the majority of men going their own way are guilty of being manginas for most of their lives, present company included. And most of us can't be bothered learning to become pickup artists and some of us lack the intelligence or self-confidence to walk up to women and wind them up. And that's what being a pickup artist is all about. Women are like an old Model-T automobile. They aren't like guys ready for sex and attention instantly. Instead you have to wind them up with words, flirtation and playfulness. And the first step is sending out the right body language. At that point your foot is in the door. Then you have to keep boosting her ego and flirting over and over again until she gets the hots for you. You have to whisper the right combination of words into her ear and send off the right mating cues for her to lose her marbles and drop her panties. I've done this a few times but it had to be funny yet smart, strong yet sensitive, thoughtful yet forgetful. And Puas have to be masters at deflecting shit tests and throwing them back into women's faces in a comical way. It's a lot of work and most of the time it's not worth it.Bust a move: Can hypnosis increase breast size?http://drmarkgriffiths.wordpress.com/...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A big thank you to Danmandingo for his donation for making this video possible. He donated before for a video called Red Pill Rage which I'm including a link to in the description below. He had some comments as well as questions he wants me to answer and first I'll read them to you. This is what Danmandingo has to say: "Greetings once again Sandman. Please allow me to offer a deep & very sincere "Thank You" for all of the well-thought content you steadily produce, enlightening/awakening many of us out there. Recently while at work, something interesting & possibly coincidental happened. Twice within the same week I was asked by older men "Are you married"? Both times responding "No I am not" to them, I received responses like: Why not? (or) So what are you going to do? These events brought me to the realization (If many men are NOT following that old traditional protector/provider model men are accustomed to adhering to, many have no idea what ELSE to do with their lives). Personally I believe it is very important for everyone's life, to have a sense of purpose that doesn't necessarily revolve AROUND serving others. If that is something someone willingly partakes in, of course that is their decision. But if someone chooses a different path in life, it should not be looked at as unorthodox. Thank." That's what Danmandingo had to say and he wants me to cover this idea of purpose outside of service to others and instead focus on service to self. I was sitting around with three of my friends yesterday night pondering the purpose of existence and they were discussing their dating lives and how most of them wanted a relationship. Two of them have only ever had relationships that have lasted less then six months. Both of these guys own multiple properties with many tenants and have tons of money they just don't flaunt their money. For them their purpose in life is to get married, have kids and retire. And basically do nothing else with their lives. I had all of these aspirations in my mid twenties. I lived with women. I made enough passive income not to have to work more then five to ten hours a week and go to enjoy my life. Or so I thought. Their purpose is to serve women and have tons of free time which they have not idea how they would use because they've never had that much free time in the past to do nothing but think, travel and be themselves.Red Pill Ragehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwXRi...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Isn't it funny that women always seem to complain about men in male locker room talking about women. After all male locker rooms are probably one of the last true male spaces left on the face of the earth. But men don't really raise a a stink about women talking to each other in the ladies room. This double standard proves to me that women want to control all the physical spaces in our society. And one of the places they use to control men and gossip to each other about how to control men is the ladies room. I believe that more important decisions in history have been made in women's washrooms then in palaces and government legislatures. Ladies rooms are the perfect place for women to tell secrets to each other and plan their manipulation of men and each other. All women have to do is check the stalls for feet and they can speak to each other and share all the juicy gossip they want. Men on the other hand don't talk to each other in the bathroom very much and instead use locker rooms to talk about women. And usually this is in high school when boys are talking about their usually non-existent sexual encounters with prudish teenage girls. Women are usually more concerned with emotional and social capital and men are concerned with physical and financial capital. And men often talk to each other about physical capital in public or semi-public places like board rooms and offices. Places that are often open for women to enter. But women talk often talk about social capital at the girls night out or in the ladies room. Back when I was in a relationship I can't tell you how many times my ex-girlfriend would say sorry you can't come out with me or my friends tonight. It's ladies night and there are no guys coming. Sorry! But when I said that she would belittle my friends and say, I can't believe you're still friends with those losers or why don't we all go out together. At that point I would say: "Last time I went out with my friends you called them losers and yet tonight you want us all to go out together? Of course she would say I never called them losers and pretend like what she said in the past never happened. Here's a bold statement on my part. I don't think that the long lineups into the ladies room have anything to do with using the stalls. I think it comes down to gossip. And if you're in a crowded bar or party then women are usually clawing at each other to get into the bathroom so they can strategize about the men they want in the room and they don't care if there are thirty or forty women waiting outside in the line to get in. They know that those women are don't really need to pee and are just going into the bathroom to shoot the shit with their girlfriends. There usually isn't any empathy because being empathetic is not in the nature of most gossip queens.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Here are some of Dennis's comments and questions: "Please keep my real identity secret and use the name Dennis Strickton. I took the red pill around this time last year, and my life has improved dramatically ever since then. I have rejected marriage and long-term relationships, but am still open to short-term relationships provided there is some real benefit. Unlike a lot of other men going their own way, I have not had any particularly traumatic experiences with women - nothing beyond the normal frustrations of dealing with rejection on the one hand, and entitled women on the other hand. Another difference is that, while most MGTOW are either atheist or agnostic, I am an observant, traditionalist, pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic. I will admit that during my blue pill days, the primary reason I wanted to marry was that sex outside of marriage is a moral sin. I certainly didn't want to be guilty of mortal sin, but I didn't want to live without sex either. So I saw marriage as my only choice. Within Roman Catholicism, there is a strong emphasis on the idea of vocations. You are either married (with 12 children), a priest, a monk / nun / member of a religious order, or otherwise you simply have not found your true vocation. My devout friends are telling me that secular celibacy is NOT a valid option and that I need to choose one of the three, or at the very least enter a life of consecrated single-hood. In the eyes of the Church, MGTOW are seen as people who never found, or simply gave up on, their vocation. One of my devout Catholic friends told me that "MGTOW is selfish, hedonistic, materialistic, and demographically suicidal. It is Satanic, saying "Non serviam" to God, man, nation, and race. MGTOW and MRA are unnatural, erroneous, untenable, losing, immoral positions; the correct position is benevolent patriarchy. Even first wave feminism was a mistake." another one said "MGTOW is fundamentally selfish, turning inward on oneself, the sure sign of pride and sin. It is concerned with comfort and not Goodness, duty, charity. We Catholics should be giving our entire lives to doing God's will, not being selfish and materialistic. Sure, we should be prudent, cautious, and practice self-preservation; we should make sure that our wife obeys us, is virtuous, is Catholic, is humble and modest, etc."Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

It seems like everywhere I look these days I see overweight women calling themselves sexy and empowered even if they are fifty pounds overweight. And websites like plenty of fish and OK Cupid are providing larger ladies with male attention they never would have enjoyed ten or fifteen years ago. There are even big & beautiful dance clubs and popping up all over north America and Europe. Women are getting the message that they can become as large as they want and still find a guy that's an eight or a nine to date and marry them. They are turning their weight management problems into a huge asset, no pun intended. Women used to blame genetics twenty years ago saying things like, I'm overweight because of genetics. But they are now wearing their fat with pride, almost like a badge of pudgy honor and behaving exactly like their thinner counterparts. There are clothing stores for large ladies, night clubs and even annual conventions. The culture has shifted creating a situation where thin women accept larger women. And I think it was in an earlier video that I spoke about how thin ladies keep larger ladies around to keep make their own market valuerise. And the large ladies that hang around with the more attractive women are there to get male scraps from the hot girls. How many times have many of us been turned down in the past by a thin and attractive woman only to be thrown a bone by her. The attractive woman throws us their fat ugly friend and we are supposed to feel grateful. Sometimes that large lady is thrown at us by them as a shit test to see if have enough self esteem and determination to continue to pursue the attractive lady. The friendship between the large ladies and regular size girls is one of the unholy alliances in female own group preference. I think it was the women of ordinary weight that led to that acceptance of larger ladies by society. The fat women meant less competition for the women that were nines and tens. And now the overweight women are striking out on their own. It will be interesting to see just how far society accepts larger women in social circles. Instead of the skinny women trying to get their fat friends to lose weight and maintain some common thread in beauty and attractiveness they have used the situation to their advantage and have no sympathy for fat women. Being overweight generally lessens a woman's lifespan, makes them have more health problems, limits their ability to find gainful employment, reduces their chances of finding a man to marry, creates irregular menstrual cycles thus destroying fertility and speeds up the aging process so they hit the wall years before they naturally would. Not to mention that some fat women's vagina's haven't seen daylight in many decades. Who knows what kind of bacteria are growingin the shadow of all that fat. Yet larger ladies are trying to convince themselves and society that their value is just as high as women that are thin and trim. A rational man would see all of these negatives and refuse to date larger women. Only a man blinded by lustful sexual desire and love would see larger ladies as worthy of his affection.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

The title for this video obviously gives away the topic. Yesterday I was talking to a friend of mine and he just started dating someone and told me that he was setting aside five hundred dollars a month so that he could pay for dates with a girl he started dating a few weeks ago. That's just less then half of his rent money and he said that money was set aside for two or three dates a week with him spending a modest forty to fifty dollars for each date. It wouldbe mostly average quality restaurants he was planning on taking her to as well as movies. And he would pay for the tickets and popcorn. He just shrugged his shoulders and said that's just the way it is. I interrupted and said that doesn't have to be the way it is. I never spent that much money dating per month in the past. And my partners didn't leave me for being cheap if I wanted to act that way. I hardly spent any money. For me money was to be saved and used on big trips and to purchase things that gain value over time or pay for themselves. Not things that depreciate in value. I also told him he could get two or three decent call girls a month for that price and have the guarantee of sex. I told him that if he was going to pay that kind of money to take women out on dates that he was failing the shit test women were putting him through. Men think that women expect men to pay for dinner, pick them up and drop them off after the date. I'm wouldn't be shy to leave a woman at the subway station and let her find her own way home, even if it's the middle of the night. In the past women would complain about why I wasn't giving them a ride home or paying for a cab to take them home. But guess what? I would always go out with them after that. If a woman is attracted to you and wants to sleep with you she will often times complain that you're not treating her like a princess. And I've had other friends confirm this behavior. And I think it has to do with being shit tested. And like any other shit test it never ends. And the moment you spend tons of money for a couples dinner the woman loses respect for you. And if you don't she nags at you. It's a catch 22 or Kobayashi Maru Test. There is no way to win the a no win scenario. Just ask Captain Kirk. The only way he won the no-win scenario in his days in Star Trek was to reprogram the computer. So in essence he cheated on the test. With female biology you can't cheat unless like I've said in the past you rewire women's DNA. In the future if by some miracle we can rework our genetic makeup or rewire our minds then it might be possible. But the way things stand today the only way to win a no win scenario with women is not to the play the game and go your own way.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I was thinking about the idea of the dowry recently. I was talking to a friend about the past and how today society views women as virtuous while in the past they were considered a burden. In most cultures women came with a dowry to ease the financial pain for the men and families they married into. The dowry is essentially a forced transfer of wealth from the brides family to the grooms family. You are paying someone else to take her away so to speak. It was a way for a woman's relations to essentially bribe the new family to take her from them. In recent history European culture they were called the hope chest or glory box. But they go back all the way to Babylonian, Greek and ancient Romantimes. And in most of the ancient world it was the brides parents and the brides husband that had the authority to control the assets found in the dowry. You can see why in that case many people can look back into history and say society must have been patriarchal if men were the ones controlling dowries. But we have to remember that the contents of the the dowry were earned by the brides parents and were there to help the husband cover the costs of starting a household. After-all it was the men that provided the majority of the economic support through agriculture up until the industrial revolution. The dowry, an asset that was created to help men offset the financial burden of marriage is considered by many of today's feminists as an asset that proves that men were trying to oppress women by not letting them control their own financial destiny. That's the equivalent of saying that parents are oppressing their children if they buy them clothing for Christmas instead of letting them buy nothing but toys. What most people feminists fail to recognize that a man had multiple daughters he had to setup multiple dowries for their future marriages. Seems to me like the fathers forced to pay out dowries were the ones that were being oppressed financially. And in Italy during the Renaissance the hope chests or dowry boxes were often worth more then the contents of the hope chests It was all about the illusionthat men had the means to pay outrageous dowries for daughters. Some of them looked so elaborately decorated that they resembled the arc of the covenant. I know in Indian culture that many dowries are quite literally full of real gold coins and jewelry. And that gold is often passed on from generation to generation. Which is one of the main reasons why India's gold consumption has gone up with it's population and economic prosperity.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

First of all I'd like to thank Jacek for your donation. He said that my youtube channel has changed his life so I'm dedicating this video to him. Anyways, a couple of days ago someone told me he was planning on living into his old age single so that he could get action at the old age home. He even went as far as to refer to old age homes as brothels with wrinkles. And if he makes it to the old age home he'll essentially have his pick of all the old women living there. My answer to him is that is if women in their thirties and forties are little interested in sex what makes you think that women in their seventies and eighties will have an interest? What makes you think you'll even keep it up in a nursing home. When I used to visit my grandmother at the nursing home there were about eight to nine old women for every single old men that I saw in there. The few men I saw in there were in wheel chairs and couldn't take care of themselves at home. So they put themselves in the nursing homes instead. It was really sad to see forty to sixty year old men stuck in nursing homes and where were the other men? I'm assuming they are either dead or at home. I think the one thing many of us aren't thinking about is that many women take care of their sick husbands at home so that's why I didn't see them in the nursing homes and hospitals my grandmother was in. Either that or they were all dead. But let's make the assumption that women from the greatest generation, that's the generation that fought in the second world war and gave birth to the baby boomers are doing the honorable thing to do and staying with their husbands as they get Alzheimer and other diseases that make them bed ridden. Do you really think the selfish women from the boomer generation are going to stick it out with their husbands or do you think they will leave their dying wrinkled husbands in bed, divorce them and head the casino? Maybe it's cheaper to keep HIM in this case. Nursing homes are expensive costing two or three thousand dollars a month not including the medication. But neglecting your husband at home while he dies a slow or not so slow death might be the way to go for many women. What do you guys think? Do you think that elderly women are keeping their elderly husbands at home and possibly in squalor and without the proper means to take care of them so they have an extra two to three thousand dollars per month? Do you think this is love? Or do you think it comes down to economics and economic opportunism? That extra couple thousand sure buys a lot of fun at the bingo hall.Barbados: Older persons contracting HIV/AIDShttp://www.jamaicaobserver.com/latest...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

What happens if you take the red pill when you turn forty, fifty, sixty or even seventy years old? What happens when you've already raised a family or are finishing up the process when you realize how gynocentric culture works and that your wife will never change? And that for the rest of your married life you will have to listen to her, deal with her outrageous demands and accept it otherwise you'll have to go through a messy divorce, lost more then half of your assets and most likely spend the remainder of your life explaining away to your children that you left your mother because you took the red pill and saw the light. Do you really think your children are going to forgive you for leaving their mother or for spending their inheritance on lawyers to leave your mother? Especially if there is no real reason for you to leave. So many men in this position figure out that it's just cheaper to keeper. Staying in an unhappy and unfulfilled relationship for the sake of keeping your money, your friends and your children around are fair trade offs for many men that consider leaving their wives later in life. It takes a lot of guts to leave someone after a decade or two or more of marriage. You know that you will lose a lot and what you have to gain might not be worth it. So at this point in your life like I mentioned it's "Cheaper to Keeper." Then there's the issue of grand children as well. This is yet another guilt trip to keep you from leaving. A lot of people assume that it's all about money when leaving a woman you've been married to for twenty or thirty years. A lot also has to do with the emotional toll. Imagine the guilt trips from close family members, friends, relatives and the fact that society makes you feel like you're going to die all alone. But it's not like the nursing homes and the hospitals are going to turn you away just because you're divorced. I think the real reason people say it's cheaper to keep her is because it's an excuse. You don't want to uproot your life this late in the games and start all over again. In many cases it's too late to start all over again. I pull the eject button on my last relationship after ten years because there was no future for that relationship because I wanted a family and wasn't going to get one. So it was time to leave and luckily I managed to stumble into the red pill. In my case it was more expensive to stay. I felt I could still salvage my life, have a family and meet someone new. Now I don't want that anymore. The most I feel I want at this point is a child through surrogacy. Someone to raise and provide all the emotional support I never got when I was younger. Not a child to treat like a possession or a commodity. And I'm acquainted with loss at this point in my life and am willing to let that child go and live for themselves when they don't need me anymore.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy