MGTOW Sandman Quotes

- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Mystery Link: https://un-coupled.com/Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Harry. He didn't give me a topic so I wanted to cover and article called: "WEDDING TRAGEDY Bride ‘dies on her wedding day so groom ties the knot with her younger sister as victim lay dead in next room". It's from the UK Sun and the article is short so I'll read it in it's entirety. Here goes and I quote: "A BRIDE in India died on her wedding day so her husband-to-be married her younger SISTER instead, reports claim. The body of the woman, named Surbhi, lay in a room next door as the marriage reportedly took place moments later. Surbhi suffered a heart attack at the ceremony after exchanging garlands with husband-to-be Manjesh Kumar as part of Hindu wedding tradition. A doctor from the local village was called to the scene but was unable to save her. Surbhi's brother said: “It's hard to believe a dead body was in the other room — and a bride was being prepared in the next one.” Speaking to news agency IANS, he said: ”Both the families sat together and someone suggested that my younger sister Nisha should be married to the groom. “The families discussed the matter and both agreed.” The last rites of the bride were performed after the marriage. It is thought the Surbhi's family would likely have been expecting a dowry. Her mother, made an emotional appeal for the wedding to go ahead, it is reported. The groom's uncle said the marriage ceremony was conducted according to Hindu customs. "Everything was happening quite nicely. "She fainted moments before taking sath pehre (seven rounds around the fire)," Ajab stated. The bride's uncle said: "My daughter was happy on her marriage day. We're doomed.” unquote. I understood everything except that part about the daughter being happy on her marriage day. That's usually what happens doesn't it? Maybe he was referring to the other daughter Nisha being happy that she had taken her dead sisters place? It doesn't really specify. I feel sorry for the groom. He was literally one heartbeat away from freedom when his I presume arranged marriage wife just lost her life and then her greedy mother stepped in at the moment of her daughters deat and demanded the dowry and offered up her daughter Gisha up as a new bride for those Gemesh bucks. I guess in India you have to do whatever it takes to keep those simp bucks a flowing. Imagine being the daughter that took her dead sisters place. Surprise it's your wedding day now, your sister is dead in the other room and you're marrying Simpesh and not the man you really want Rajrone. Also I know this story is from last year but what's with another young person dying randomly from a heart attack. Gee I wonder what might be causing it? No need for an autopsy. Nothing to see here. Keep moving on folks. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Chris Whalen CPAhttp://www.chriswhalencpa.comhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0979352266Mystery Link: https://youtu.be/74tzgoum_pk?t=244Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Miss Meg and here's what she briefly has to say: "Hi Sandman, Is it possible for me to change or am I just gonna be like this until the day I die? Is there any tips you can give me on controlling my female nature or something? Even this simple interaction feels like I'm attempting to manipulate you guys. Is it best I just stay away from men and go my own way? Is it a safer option? I'm just curious on your thoughts about this." Well Miss Meg thanks for the donation and topic. Most guys will definitely see your topic request as a manipulation. They will say that you're trying to spread hope that women can change and that there's a traditional unicorn woman with breasts wishing them the best. But most guys on this channel won't fall for that baloney. We know better. Your request might be taken as virtue signalling that you're one of the good ones. When it comes to controlling human nature the first thing to do is become aware of why we do the things that we do. I became aware of many of my behaviors by going to cognitive behavioral therapy. I would write down my actions and the thoughts leading up to them and that way I eventually understood my motives consciously. Women manipulate men into relationships for attention by putting some guys in the friend zone or a relationship if they find him attractive. Those are your survival instincts and when there isn't a man around you're going to feel like you're going to die at any moment. Men on the other hand when we are single our mind goes into overdrive making us more productive than usual which is just an elaborate peacock maneuver to attract a mate. Some of us have figured out that if we can stay in that peacock mode we can make lots of money and like me make a lot of content. Guys contact me all the time wanting to know how they can get over their sexual urges. I tell them that they have to be disgusted by your own nature and what you become around women. That's how I got over my male desire to persue women. Not by hating women but by hating the man that I become when I was with them. When I first took the red pill I hated women for about six months but that wore off. When you hate the opposite sex or resent them then you just repress your sexual and emotional desires and become angry and miserable. That's what you see when you see all of those lesbians out there alone with barrels full of cats and boxes full of wine. But when you resent who you are around the opposite sex and how it sabotages your life only then will you be truly free. For women they are better around the opposite sex. They get attention, (which they need more of than men) mental sanity and more rational thoughts because you have to think rationally and logically about how you're going to manipulate a man to do what you want him to do. If I were a woman I would be around men and manipulate them because it's so easy most of the time. If I was a creative woman then my desire to express myself would probably override that instinct. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

The Men's Guide to High-Conflict Divorce & The Police Are Not Your Friendshttps://amzn.to/36YftNlMan Dubbed 'Creep' For Using Elliptical At The Gymhttps://www.newsweek.com/man-dubbed-c...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qetW6...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,Another day without a topic donation. If you want me to share your story or topic you can do so by sending a donation to the paypal or subscribestar link in the description. Today I want to share an article called: "Man Dubbed 'Creep' For Using Elliptical At The Gym" Apparently it was a slow new day over at newsweek and so they covered a story that sounds more like gossip and shaming language then it does news. Here's what part of that article says and I quote: "Readers of a viral post on the Reddit forum "Am I the A**hole" backed a woman who said she decided to cut her workout short after a man decided to use the elliptical machine right next to her. She shared that she typically goes to the gym at night to avoid large groups of people. However, a man hopped on the elliptical machine right next to her despite there being a row of other empty machines. Many readers chimed in to write that she was not out of line to leave early, some even criticizing the man for his gym etiquette. "It made me a little uncomfortable, so I shortened my workout by a few minutes and hopped off to grab a disinfectant wipe," she said. When she returned to her machine, she said the man asked her "what her problem was. Caught off guard, she said she told him that she was done with her workout. "But he said something about me 'treating him like a predator for no reason' and then put his headphones back in," she wrote, concluding her post. "That guy is a weirdo," a top comment read. "Gym etiquette: don't take the machine RIGHT NEXT to someone if there are other vacant ones. Especially during covid. And not next to a single woman." Many Redditors wrote that his reaction to her leaving was also strange. "He jumped to conclusions from the act of you getting off an elliptical, sounds like he's projecting some feelings there," one Reddit user wrote. "He had no reason to assume she was weirded out by him other than that he obviously knew it was weird to take the elliptical right next to her's," a comment read. "It 100% seems like he was telling on himself for creeping." "The fact that he got upset about it is telling," another commented. "If he didn't want to be treated like a creep he shouldn't have acted like one." unquote. I love stories like this because the guy at the gym shamed for something she may or may not have done and then proceeded to tune her out by putting his earphones one. He made what appears to be a judgement call and then didn't give her a chance to respond like a boss. That's what a woman would do. Men are increasingly behaving like petty passive aggressive females. Women have complained about toxic masculinity and now they are getting toxic femininity thrown back in their face and all they can say is muh etiquette. I'll discuss more about this delightful situation in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor T Fitz:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:Profit Specialist Groupvideo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FV-m...https://www.cashisking.cc/Scientific Redpills - Study finds: The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to smash other men when she can get pregnant.https://www.goingyourownway.com/mgtow...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lkQP...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Alex and here's what he very briefly has to say: "Hi Sandman. Thank you for your hard work. I really appreciate it." Well Alex thanks for the donation and I thought I'd cover a recent post from Going your own way dot com which I've put in the description called: "Scientific Redpills - Study finds: The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to smash other men when she can get pregnant." Here's what someone named GrnB has to say and I quote: "Studies like this are a great read, redpills with scientific evidence. I am going to translate this into normal English. The study title is: “Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability”. Which means The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to be with other men when she can get pregnant. Another key line reads “Normally ovulating women have been found toreport greater sexual attraction to men other than their own partners when near ovulation relative to the luteal phase” meaning that normal girlfriends and wives do not want to bang their boyfriend or husband when they can get pregnant. The article continues by saying “In a sample of 54 couples, we found that women whose partners had high developmental instability (high fluctuating asymmetry) had greater attraction to men other than their partners, and less attraction to their own partners, when fertile.” Which means out of 54 couples, girlfriends and wives who had ugly boyfriends or husbands wanted to someone else even more when they were ready to get pregnant. The final line is that “females may sometimes benefit from a strategy in which they secure investment from a long-term mate and obtain genetic benefits from extra-pair partners.” Meaning Betabux and alphafux." unquote. Thank you GrnB for posting that. What I found really funnyg about the way it's worded is that author one Steven Gangestad has to tip toe around the truth. When he says that women will go for a man with more developmental stability it's such a vague term. Does it mean he has low stability when it comes to his career and income? Or does it mean he's looks aren't the best. What exactly is high fluctuating asymmetry. Does that mean his behavior as a provider protector isn't consistent and therefore she isn't happy? Does it mean that his face isn't symmetrical and that the black pilled community is right? That's exactly what it means and it stands for FA. They measured the symmetry of men's ear length, ear width, elbow width, wrist length, length of fingers, ankle width and foot width. The study also concludes that appearance wasn't the only determining factor but male behavior. That women want the complete package or that they are more likely to look elsewhere. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: - MGTOW's Guide to Retiring on $200K in SE Asia- http://www.mgtowbooks.com- Promo code SANDMAN for 10% offHistoric Noonday Mine Tour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2Stj...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsm4p...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video isn't brought to you by any donations because I didn't get any for today. If you want me to cover a specific topic you can do so through the Paypal and Subscribestar links found in the description. As for this video for most of it I'll discuss why it's not only a good idea to avoid women but a great idea and in the last little bit I'll give everyone my thoughts on the economy, stock and crypto markets. As for why you should avoid women first off because you don't want to get used as an emotional tampon. Most men don't internalize all the negative energy that they get from interacting with women and instead go to work and use other men as a dumping ground for negative emotional energy. Or they risk dumping it onto your friends, boss or some other poor schmuck in the form of road rage. What do you think the film falling down is all about? A man that's tired of being used as a man or male tampon and he finally releases thirty years of bloody goodness onto soyciety. If you try and do the right moral thing and bottle up all that negative emotion that women dump on you like I do then usually you internalize that negative emotion and it messes up your health or gives you anxiety issues. But if women don't dump it onto you then they get anxiety issues. It also saves you massive amounts of time to avoid women because it takes time for her to distribute her angst onto you. An hour or two of unproductive talking equals the lost opportunity cost of doing something more productive. Not to mention that you have to waste even more time after you see her dumping the emotional dump she took onto your head onto somebody else. Once you understand that they all do these sorts of things even your mother included you get anxiety just being in their presence expecting that dump truck full of emotional sludge to be dropped on your head. While you can't see the toxic waste you end up looking like Emil from Robocop on the inside after Murphy dumps him in a vat of toxic waste. Sometimes female contact at home or work is unavoidable. But if we men went on an attention strike for two or three days to a week women would love their collective minds because they wouldn't know where to dump their emotions. Women always threaten to leave men and part of that is so that you fear losing her validation. To mess with your self esteem she's gas-lighting you in many cases when she has zero intention to leave and what she wants you to do is get scared and give her your attention. If men went on that strike we would have the ultimate bargaining chip. Women would realize that we know the game and at first they would just laugh it off nervously like it was no big deal and then they would start bargaining and begging us for attention after they spoke to all of their girlfriends and they no longer had any outlets to get rid of their bad fefes. Every woman would be negative and the negative emotions would just amplify. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW Book Collection Part 2:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:The Men's Guide to High-Conflict Divorce & The Police Are Not Your Friendshttps://amzn.to/36YftNlMystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyqzM...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video isn't brought to you by any donations because I didn't get any for today. I thought I'd share a short article from May 14, 1923 in the New York Times that shows you that female nature trying to shut down male spaces and shut us up stretches way back in time. The woman in it even calls men that are single and refuse to remarry simps. That was one of the earliest documented uses. Here's what it says and I quote: "Woman Calls Bachelors "Simps" "Afraid to Take a Chance," Says Woman Referring to Club. In Atlantic City New Jersey on May 13 a letter signed by "Miss Lillian Henderson," which bitterly assailed Atlantic City's bachelors," was received here today by Acting Captain of Detectives Frank Feretti from Newark. The letter referred particularly to the now defunct Bachelors' Club here and the Atlantic City Widowers Association. "Those bachelor simps." wrote Miss Henderson." are afraid to take a chance and are too tight to share their earnings with a wife." The Bachelor Club assailed by Miss Henderson disbanded recently when some of its members deserted and married. The Widowers' Association headed by City Detective Edward Sowney, is formed mainly of those who have traveled a stormy marital path and have sworn "never again." unquote. At first I couldn't figure out why Miss Lillian Henderson petitioned the police to shut down a bachelor's club. Then it dawned on me she was probably trying to cancel Detective Edward Sowney back in 1923 for being head of the Widower's Association. That's probably the real reason she contacted his place of employment and sent his higher up the letter. This is 100 years ago and the cancel culture ideas remain the same the names have just change. Back then Widowers and bachelor's associations were used by men to meet and share ideas about female nature and probably just network. But proto feminists and suffragettes back then wanted to shut down all male spaces. They had shut down the bars when they banned alcohol only three years before thanks to the prohibition act. But that wasn't enough. Lilian was using the typical shaming language that single men were selfish and stupid simps. Shaming men back then for being cowards unwilling to take a chance. All stuff I recently spoke about in a video I shared that has a chapter from my upcoming book called: "Shaming Single Men." Lilian contacted active Captain of Detectives Frank Feretti. She was trying to shame detective Sowney to his boss and put pressure on him by also shaming him and all the detective to try and get Sowney canned. Lilian is trying to scare men from talking to one another in their own clubs and associations without the company of a woman. She's trying to say that they will be cancelled and it's pure scare tactics the way we see today. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor T Fitz:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Man's Married NOT to His Lover But a Corpse Bridehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXQ8i...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMAru...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video is brought to you by a donation from Lord Jaguar and here's what he has to say: "Soyciety will stop at nothing to shame me into a relationship I honestly thought I wanted for 30ish years or so. If I don't want one then their will be hell to pay. One time my father says to me, "Dude don't clean the garage because it gives your mother something to complain about." I was a bit taken back and thought that was dumb. Now I understand it was bored women in the 1950's, bored from technology making life easier for them, that snapped from a Utopian level of happiness to cause chaos. The house was built to be cleaned and keep crazies the clown, aka modern women, at bay. Women were better off when they had to do dishes by hand because they didn't have an existential crisis due to time creep. Every time we invent a time saving device we have to fill the void, and now a days that means drugs or cheap meaningless sex. I heard from a contact that the homeless community doesn't just like to get spun out on heroin, but to shove a plunger up their poop chute to top it off. My contact says he misses the day when they just used to get spun out on heroin. But that's not the only thing I want you to talk about. I want you to comment on a movie review that I found recently that in Taoism some women that die unmarried get married after death to prevent a banshee/ghost from coming back from the dead and haunting the whole village. When I heard that I thought about dating again and I quit. In such a situation the man the family will select for the undead husk is the first schmuck to touch a red envelope left out in the open. Thanks for not getting our consent, and women complain about an expensive ring we buy for them, but they can give us a red economic rape envelope. So in essence, If women reject you, level up. If you reject women, they'll threaten a bachelor tax, force marriage, force reproduction, slander you, shame you, and now come back form the after life and haunt you and your loved/unloved ones! That's INSANE!!! Women hate rejection and accountability, and so do men, but if we come back from the dead to haunt the village because we didn't burdened with wedlock, the whole village would drop what they were doing and laugh you back into the nether realm. It would be the ghost equivalent of going postal in high school because you didn't get a date to the prom. Another tactic used by Western women is to threaten suicide when you catch them cheating on you." Well Lord Jaguar thanks for the donation and topic. I'll get to it in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Chris Whalen CPAhttp://www.chriswhalencpa.comhttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0979352266Lauren Southern: https://youtu.be/VcM-zv9QDlo?t=5690John Stamos' ex-wife Rebecca Romijn admits to current husband she misses 'a lot of things' about her exhttps://www.yahoo.com/news/john-stamo...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuWzQ...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a more than generous donation from Mr. Anonymous from the Swiss Alps. This is the first of five videos I'm making for him. Recently I came across an article called: "John Stamos' ex-wife Rebecca Romijn admits to current husband she misses 'a lot of things' about her ex" which I've linked to in the description. It's short so I'll read it and then share my thoughts. So here goes and I quote: "Rebecca Romijn got candid about her past relationships with current husband Jerry O'Connell. Romijn admitted there's a "lot of things" she misses about ex-husband John Stamos during a recent appearance on "The Talk." "Going through a divorce is terrible, it’s awful," Romijn explained to O’Connell on the show. "I was with him for 10 years. Divorce feels like a failure and there were a lot of things that I had to let go of that were very sad." O'Connell noted that Romijn's relationship with Stamos seemed "fun" to him. "I have a lot of really fun memories," she responded. "I have a lot of fond memories of him. A lot of things about him that I miss. But yeah, it’s tricky. It’s a very hard decision to come to when you decide to end a marriage. It was heartbreaking." Stamos and Romijn got engaged in 1997 and tied the knot the following year. The two were married until Stamos filed for divorce in 2004. Romijn also recalled seeing Stamos for the first time since the two split while at a strip mall with her kids "just a few weeks ago." After the "Full House" actor walked in front of her car, she pointed him out to her kids and explained that she used to date him. The kids asked her how she knew it was Stamos. "I said, ‘Girls, it’s because I was with him for 10 years. I would recognize that gait from a block away,'" Romijn recalled saying. "I recognize the way his body moves. I know that walk. I’m familiar with his body." The "Femme Fatale" actress began dating O'Connell shortly after the split and the two married in 2007. Romijn and O'Connell share two kids together. O'Connell and Romijn began dating after the actress and Stamos had legally split. The two met while Romijn was on a date with another guy." unquote. Boy of boy this is going to be fun. Rebecca is certainly giving off the that Alpha Widow regret. She says it is a hard decision when you decide to end a marriage. But that's just it she wasn't the one that ended it. She got dumped by Stamos as he was the one filing for divorce. Luckily Yahoo news filled us in that. He was the one that dumped her close to the top of her beauty and fame when she was in her early to mid thirties. Back when she was playing super sexy mystique. Now she plays number 1 in Star Trek Discovery and I guess she plays number 2 for Stamos. Also way to go destroying Jerry O'connell's self confidence on national television by sharing the story about how she misses the life she had with Stamos. Does she want Jerry the father of your children to know that he got uncle Jesse's sloppy seconds. Have mercy Rebecca! Have mercy! Something tells me that Jerry wasn't her first pick. I also can't get over the way they men while Romijn was on a date with another guy. Talk about monkey branching In the middle of your meal. So she gets dumped by a Greek Adonis with great hair to marry the fat kid from Stand By Me. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Chris Whalen:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:Surviving 4th Wave Feminismhttps://amzn.to/3hu3Ai6Women ultimately may pay the price for finally earning as much as menhttps://nypost.com/2022/04/16/women-m...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkA8_...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman Here,Another day without a topic donation. If you want to request a topic you can through a small payment through paypal or subscribestar. So with that out of the way I want to talk about an article called: "Women ultimately may pay the price for finally earning as much as men" from the New York Post. Now let me read a few key points from that article and I quote: "Across the nation, young women now earn 93 cents on the dollar overall when compared to men, according to Pew – with economists attributing that stubborn 7-cent difference to the lower number of hours worked by young women compared to men. When accounting for factors such as job title, education, experience, industry, job level, and hours worked, that number rises to a hair-splitting 99 cents on the dollar, according to Payscale’s recently-released 2022 State of the Gender Pay Gap Report. As the “wage gap” closes, a “partner gap” is taking its place – leaving women struggling to find a desirable match for marriage and motherhood. Evolutionary psychologists say that women tend to be more attracted to men who are more highly educated and/or out-earn them because sex can bring great costs for women – namely pregnancy and childbirth. Women, the theory goes, seek a partner who can ensure she is fed, sheltered and protected while pregnant — as well as secure her offspring’s well-being after delivery. Finding men of higher or even equal earning and academic status is increasingly difficult because of the “college gap” which widens year after year. unquote. Well folks forget about men going their own way reducing relationship and marriage formation. Women are pricing themselves out of the market because of high standards that very few men can live up to these days. So now we know conclusively that the gender wage gap no longer exists. If a woman complains about it point to this article and tell her she's lying. So now that the gender wage gap is gone feminists and women are inventing the next form of oppression, the Gender Partner gap. They need to get more funding from governments for being oppressed even though they are financially and educationally empowered. Are evolutionary psychologists taking into consideration that some women fear earning more money than men because it's the men that might start taking them to the divorce court cleaners the way they take men? They probably believe there is an underclass of disgruntled males out there just waiting to use them for beta female provisioning. Women always have to complain about the next thing that's hurting them. But I believe that we have hit the point of diminishing returns for nagging and complaining. Articles like this one tell me that women always see themselves as victims even when the win. They are the ones that created the partner gap and now they probably expect that men or the government will fix it. They will probably shame men to work harder and compete with women so that women have someone to marry. Meanwhile with female hiring quotas and the advantage in education rates women will never give up the gains they've made in college. So this puts the whole species into a stressful situation. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Surviving 4th Wave Feminism:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Profit Specialist Groupvideo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FV-m...https://www.cashisking.cc/Skirt Clubhttps://skirtclub.co.uk/homeMen and Women Respond Identically to Erotic Imageshttps://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkZ0q...Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comHi Everyone Sandman, This video is brought to you by a donation from Truth Seeker and here's what he has to say: "Hi, Sandman! I'm a guy from Norway pushing 50, that relies more on observation and research regarding women, than actual experience. What I have noticed is that women's lack of interest in men, is often explained away, with them wanting high status men, men with resources and sometimes men with the best bodies/DNA for their reproductive urges. But female homosexuality is becoming more and more common. Like Skirt-Club that has venues for bi-curious women in more than 20 cities all over the world: Then there is research showing no difference in how male and female brains react to erotic visual stimuli, and the complete failure of the magazine 'Playgirl' to attract female readers. Leading to the obvious conclusion that women are more aroused by women's bodies than men's. And the constant blaming of men for only 30% of women being able to reach orgasm, when women have no problem reaching it when being with other women. This might also correlate to the revelation made by one of the spicey websites that ends with the second word hub, that most of their female viewers watch spicy content with two women gettin it on. So these facts have led me to the conclusion that when it comes to sexuality, and not need for male validation, relationship or primal reproductive urges, women are more homosexual than heterosexual. Would love to hear your thoghts on these issues. Best Regards, 'Truth-Seeker'" Well Truth-Seeker thanks for the donation and topic. I like to rely on as much data as possible and the first thing I want to share is this poll that I've shared before in another video showing that 16 percent of zoomers are LGBT. In 2 generations if the trend of doubling continues from one generation to the next fifty to sixty percent of males and females will be LGBT. The question is is this just the way women have always been or is there something more to it? My Sandman Spidey sense is telling me that since our soyciety has been over sexualized it's taking a lot more to turn both men and women on. Since the female body is more visually appealing I don't blame women for being turned on by it. Then again women being more interested in women might just be a natural part of our species. Take a look at this Tweet that Mr. Obvious shared about how the disintigration of the family and rise in homosexuality led to the fall of Rome. He thinks we are going through something similar in the west right now. I agree. Chastity is all about harnessing human productive energy to build civilization. Uncontrolled sexual energy leads to the destruction of civilization because when you're into pleasure you have nothing to show for it except a temporary good feeling followed by chasing the next sexual high. But when you aren't sexually satisfied you have to keep working on other things in life and transmute your sexual energy into your family or your work. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy